Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Approach lighting failure at night

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Approach lighting failure at night

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Dec 2011, 08:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Approach lighting failure at night

Mornin'

Reference EU-Ops with the following scenario:

It's night, weather/cloud not sparkling but should be OK. Cat1 ILS and the approach lighting has failed leaving fully serviceable runway edge, threshold wing bars, stop end, PAPIs etc.

What are the legalities of making an approach to this r/w? What if they failed before dispatch or at a time after commencement of the approach? I assume that maybe higher minima might apply and that there might be further constraints if the flight was public transport. Basically, can it be done?

Thanks for the help,
L
Lissart is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 08:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will need to adjust your approach RVR requirements for "NIL FACILITIES" You can still make an approach so long as the RVR is at or above the adjusted value.
pilot999 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 18:36
  #3 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
All airport lighting is interleaved. That is to comply with ICAO Annex 14 which requires that no 2 adjacent lights should both fail.

What it means is that separate circuits power 50% of each service e.g. Approach lights, Edge Threshold and End.

So the chances of both circuits failing and robbing you of all the approach lights is in to the 10 x e7 category.

EU Ops gives a table of degradation to help permit commanders decide to land or divert but it takes no account of real world command control and power supply provisions.

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 21st Dec 2011, 14:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The table applies at all times unless you have the req vis ref for landing on a cat I app.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 17:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 73
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the chances of both circuits failing and robbing you of all the approach lights is in to the 10 x e7 category.
Unless the backhoe operator dug up just the right(wrong!) patch of dirt.

Failure rates that assume total isolation of redundant systems are allways a bit suspect in my book.
MurphyWasRight is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 17:29
  #6 (permalink)  
DB6
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it can be done. Higher RVR minima apply but no change to the DA/H. An example I just looked at (EGPD Rwy 16) gives Cat1 RVR 550m with 'full' lighting, 750m with 'limited' and 1200m with 'ALS out'. The only difference at night is, if RVR equipment fails, then you can factor reported met vis by (I think) 1.5 to get RVR equivalent.

Last edited by DB6; 21st Dec 2011 at 18:29.
DB6 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 18:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole issue about AWO is probability. Basically it means that an aircraft may not be on the RWY or close to the ground unless certain conditions are fulfilled.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.