Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 High speed rejected take off actions and AT disengage action

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 High speed rejected take off actions and AT disengage action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 11:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 High speed rejected take off actions and AT disengage action

Part of the drill for a high speed rejected take off on the 737 series is immediate thrust lever closure. The FCTM states:

"If the takeoff is rejected before the THR HLD annunciation, the AT should be disengaged as the thrust levers are moved to idle. If the AT is not disengaged, the thrust levers advance to to the selected take off thrust position when released. After THR HLD is annunciated, the thrust levers, when retarded, remain in idle. For procedural consistency, disengaged the AT for all rejected take offs.

From observation of high speed rejected takeoffs in simulator sessions, we often see the pilot rapidly actuating the autothrottle disconnect switch in the thrust lever handle, as a momentary first action before closing the thrust levers.

This slight delay of about 1-2 seconds before thrust levers are closed (even though the perception is of simultaneous action of AT disengage and thrust lever closure) extends the stopping distance by 2-300 feet which could be critical on a runway limiting take off.


This habit may be ingrained because of the normal procedure of disconnecting the AT before closing the thrust lever of a failed engine in flight.

It is worth thinking about - especially if the runway is wet and the stopping distance already increased. It is better to fully close the thrust levers first (high speed reject) and only then disconnect the AT switch (for procedural consistency as per FCTM). Comments invited but next time you are in the simulator have a close look. Every split second delay in thrust lever closure during a high speed rejected take off means extra stopping distance.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 16:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As you said, no need to waste time by first disconnecting A/T before slamming the thrust levers back and raising the reverse levers... A/T wouldn't be able to move the thrust levers forward once the reverse levers are up. That's how it would play out on the 747.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 16:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -11`
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 737 it is very easy to close the thrust levers and disconnect the A/T simultaneously. If you see something else in the sim, the guys just don't execute the procedure correctly.
No need to change the procedure, just teach them how to do it correctly. It is no big deal.

@Gorter: On the 737 the RTO brakes kick in as soon as the thrust levers are closed as long as the groundspeed is over 90 kts.
seat 0A is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 17:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My friend rejected a takeoff in a 767 at high speed on a long runway and the RTO went to max braking when he reduced the throttles. Caused him a lot of grief at the hearing since the fuse plugs caused the tires to deflate. The ground crew in Brazil opened the side cockpit windows during the day and didn't close them properly so it opened on take off roll. He forgot to check if it was locked, not just closed. Sometimes that automatic stuff can really screw up your day.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 18:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think he got problems because of RTO braking, it was rather about stopping for a not closed flightdeck window which is not a stopping item and can easily be closed once airborne. There is even a nice boeing training video about that out there.
Denti is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2011, 19:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ground crew in Brazil opened the side cockpit windows during the day and didn't close them properly so it opened on take off roll. He forgot to check if it was locked, not just closed.
I believe boeing makes it very clear that a open cockpit window is not a reason to reject above 80kts....

In fact boeing has done a series of unlocked window takeoffs with a 737 to demonstrate this. Furthermore, a major german charter airline includes a takeoff with a open cockpit window as training for their 757/767 crews.

The boeing video used to be on youtube or still is (too lazy to find it) but in any case the crew continued the takeoff with no problems whatsoever, leveled off and closed it without any problems.

Edit: Didn't see what Denti wrote before me, but he is spot on!
B-HKD is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 01:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't RTO always maximum braking!

At least until you kick it out when the situation becomes under control!

Cheers...
EW73 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 04:05
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kicking it out is something one sees a lot in the simulator with somewhat inexperienced or badly trained chaps. Seems many have a "nerve memory" reaction to hit the brakes
Agree. Seen it countless times. However if it does happen inadvertently caused by a reflex touch of one or both brakes, a quick thinking PNF will call "Autobrake disengaged" as per FCTM advice. It is a different matter when the pilot deliberately overides the RTO because he mistakenly thinks he can do better. Then he should call "Manual Braking" so that the PNF knows what is going on.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 08:31
  #9 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind the unlocked window! What is more worrying is that bubbers 'friend' was surprised by max braking on the RTO. I think I would be more careful with whom I flew.
BOAC is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 09:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Age: 63
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He didn't say he was surprised by the braking,just that it caused a lot of grief at the hearing?
Sounds like other people were more surprsed.
Quality Time is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 10:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wellington
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can RTO braking not be cancelled once it kicks in?



<Have never flown anything bigger then an Archer.
speaker is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 10:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See post #8......
EW73 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 10:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kicking it out is something one sees a lot in the simulator with somewhat inexperienced or badly trained chaps. Seems many have a "nerve memory" reaction to hit the brakes and do their own braking during a rejected take off, however that will quit the RTO function which is already max possible braking. Especially interesting to see on a limiting runway when they depart the end at 50 kts...
Denti is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2011, 17:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a slight correction for "Seat 0A'....post #4, if I may!

I understand the GS only needs to 60 knots for RTO (90 for antiskid)

Please correct me if I'm under the wrong impression!

For 'Denti'...I was simply referring to 'under control' as a factor in getting the thing stopped before the end of the hard stuff, because unless I'm going close to doing that, I don't want to grind to a halt with RTO still selected. Hence to kick it out when things are under control.

Cheers
EW73 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 20:30
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gorter . . .

close thrust lever and disconnect a/t
deploy speed brake
full reverse thrust.
On the 747 the speed brakes deploy automatically just as soon as the reverse levers are lifted out of detent, so there is no need, after closing thrust levers, to move your hand to the speed brake lever, pull it back, and then move your hand back to the thrust levers to pull the reversers. And if in the process you were to forget to click off the A/T, [switch on the thrust levers} once the thrust reverse levers are out of the forward detent, then the interlock would prevent the A/T from moving the thrust levers forward anyway.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 20:39
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Almost horizontal
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as they do on the 737, however the correct boeing procedure is speedbrakes then reversers.
Too Few Stripes is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 21:25
  #17 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Tee Emm - site wide problems with DTG stamps and other odds and sods at the moment.

The one you have cited has popped up on numerous forum threads. Hopefully, with the US holiday over in a day or three, the relevant IT tech folk will fix some of the problems.

Indeed, as you can see, in spite of posting about an hour after you .. my post is logged around 7 hours before yours. It's driving everyone mad at the moment but there is naught we can do until the US folks are back on deck.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 04:50
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPRuNe Message
Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

Please push the back button and reload the previous window.


What gives here! This is a new one on me.

Tee Emm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.