A probably stupid question from a non-pilot
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You've got 3 pitots giving constant readings that the computers check against each other for a disagree, like so:
A=400,400,400,400,400,453,750,896,345
B=400,400,400,400,400,400,603,342,533
C=400,400,400,400,400,400,400,400,400
X=-,-,-,-,-,-,400,400,400
where X is the standby pitot. As you can see, after the 5th iteration pitot A gives a differing reading, and after the 6th iteration both A & B pitots are giving differing readings. The computer is constantly monitoring the differences between pitots A,B,&C, and throws a 'disagree' at either iteration 5 or 6. This is where X is deployed and the computer can then take it's reading and compare it against each of the other pitots one by one to see if you find an 'agree' since the probability of 2 or more pitots agreeing is infinitely smaller than the probability of pitots disagreeing.
Further still, if all 3 pitots (A,B,C) aren't producing what they were (400kts) at X deployment, you can state that X is 'probably' correct and the other 3 pitots are iced, by looking at the trace back prior to the disagree and comparing it with X values.
If it then disagreed, you could retract it, clean it, redeploy it, and check again.
It can't be worse than blighting a cockpit with 3 disagreeing forms of information with no way to recover from it, can it?
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now now Jumbo, are you questioning the veracity of his statement, or impuning his qualifications? I'll have you know that I have personally had my landing gear blown off my lightning, my copilot killed by lightning, my Jepps were burned up right in my lap by lightning and had to shoot an instrument approach by memory. God Damn Lightning! Your just gonna have to take my word it!
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We've got lots (and lots) of wind-turbines around here and they us something I think is "l@ser-radar" to work out the windspeed to adapt the windmill to the wind condition.
(just an aside)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LIDAR is starting to be used by wind farm developers as a possible alternative to a temporary anemometer mast. I gather a key advantage of LIDAR is that unlike a mast it doesn't need Planning Permission (UK).
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but I don't recall ever seeing a "Pitot Struck by Lightning" Check List ...
situation one might encounter. Suffice to say the huge bright
loud and sphincter-loosening BANG gave some clue as to why
I suddenly lost my ASI and a couple of other items (B737-2)
Pitots and lightning bolts don't get on well socially.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There isn't any, just as there isn't any to cover every possible situation one might encounter. Suffice to say the huge bright loud and sphincter-loosening BANG gave some clue as to why I suddenly lost my ASI and a couple of other items (B737-2) Pitots and lightning bolts don't get on well socially.
JD
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..why does flying safely rely on something that is obviously liable to blackages or damage?
The pitot responds to speed and air density. A GPS gives you groundspeed, not speed through the air: when flying there is always wind - anywhere from the nose, side or tail, and the pitot looks forward, which is what we're really looking for as the shape of the surfaces are designed to provide lift with airspeed from the nose of the aircraft. An anemometer (cups) doesn't really respond to density. Gyros don't do it (already explained) and Inertial Navigation (INS) is really just a different way of providing what GPS now provides at lower cost and greater accuracy.
I once stuck the pitot back on my aeroplane with five-minute epoxy. The engineer had changed the tyres one day, and gone home. He'd obviously knocked the pitot as it was hanging by its tubing and no other engineer was around. Down the hardware store for some epoxy and I was rolling half an hour later. Dead simple technology. Note: Children, don't try this at home.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that, I REALLY hadn't actually thought it all through! the altitude/density issue never occurred to me.
Oh well, I'll have to try & think of some other mousetrap to invent a better one of!
Cheers
G.
Oh well, I'll have to try & think of some other mousetrap to invent a better one of!
Cheers
G.