Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Decode pls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Sep 2011, 19:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: us
Age: 44
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Decode pls

Could someone pls be kind enough to decode the rmk portion of the metar.
Thank you

RJAA 201844Z 31009KT 290V350 2000 +SHRA FEW003 BKN005 FEW020TCU 19/18 Q1004 RMK 1ST003 7ST005 2TCU020 A2966 TCU OHD MOV NE
westinghouse is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 19:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
May I suggest:
1/8 Stratus at 300ft, 7/8 Stratus at 500ft, 2/8 TCU at 2000ft; altimeter reference in inHg 29,66. Towering Cumulus overhead moving to NE. Basically just a (more precise) repeat of the first section of this METAR.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 19:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
Posts: 1,422
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1/8 of stratus at 300, 7/8 of stratus at 700, 2/8 of towering cumulus at 2000ft. Altimeter setting 29.96 inches of mercury. Towering cumulus overhead moving northeast.

Why do they do it this way: no idea.
Clandestino is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 19:23
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: us
Age: 44
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you very much.
I agree. Why put it in the rmks when the cloud information is given earlier?
westinghouse is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 20:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They're giving the types of clouds in the remarks section which might be of interest. What's odd is they report the 2000 foot layer as few above the 800 foot broken layer.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 20:50
  #6 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In fairness to RJAA they are advising you that a weather system over the field that might preclude Cat 1 for some operators is moving so may be irrelevant by the time you arrive. From a planning point of view, if you got this TAF when you were inbound and only saw 7/8 @ 500', and you were a Cat 1 operation, you would probably start planning a possible diversion etc.
parabellum is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2011, 21:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
Posts: 1,422
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FEW020TCU is pretty significant: it's where +SHRA comes from.
Clandestino is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2011, 19:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Er, wot? Perhaps I'm a cowboy, Parabellum, but if I saw 2 km visibility and BKN005, it would never even occur to me that I wouldn't get in on a Cat 1 approach.
CJ Driver is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2011, 21:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to prefer octa system of cloud cover and type of cloud. It would give me a feel of what was happening. In the name of progress I get Sc, Bk and no cloud info which tells me the square root of didley squat. Good to see some out there is still trying to give us more information not less.
Kingfisher is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2011, 21:23
  #10 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if I saw 2 km visibility and BKN005, it would never even occur to me that I wouldn't get in on a Cat 1 approach.

Depends what your Cat 1 DH is, doesn't it?, usually around 200' on an ILS, I agree, but often higher. Anything significant (bkn),below 500' would have me considering my options, at least.
parabellum is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 10:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Floating around the planet
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi ,

Asking your help to decode a message which came at the end of a METAR over Russia.

[FT USPP] 302100Z SARS34 RUMS 302100

[SA UUYY] 301700Z FTRS35 RUMS 301700

What the hell does that mean??

Thanks in advance,

A320
A-3TWENTY is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 13:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302100Z SARS34 RUMS 302100

WMO analysis header

302100 is the time group

SARS34

is a apecific data format
TTAAii

where TT is product type, such as AB for weather text summaries, or SA for surface observations (METARs);

where AA is the region of the origin of the report, such as AK for Alaska, or US for the United States;

and where ii is the report number.

So we have SA (surface observation for Aviation routine reports) RS is the region Russia(west) and 34 is the report number.


CCCC

where CCCC is the 4 letter station identifier of the source of the report; such as KDSM for Des Moines, IA or KDEN for Denver, Colorado.


RUMS is Russia Moscow.


Now that I've told you I have to kill you!!

P.S. more info can be found in WMO No. 386 Manual on the Global Telecommunication System
Part II - Operational Procedures for the GTS
or here:
http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/oi...t2_AttII05.pdf

Last edited by FE Hoppy; 31st Oct 2011 at 13:11.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2011, 14:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Floating around the planet
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks a lot , FE Hoppy

Safe Flights,

A320
A-3TWENTY is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.