Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

738 Vfly with x wind

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

738 Vfly with x wind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Sep 2011, 12:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Some where over the rainbow
Age: 37
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
738 Vfly with x wind

Heres the scenario:

Wind 90 degrees from the left 20G30 i.e. no headwind component with F30

vfly speed is half the headwind + all gust component with min of +5 and max +20 knots

Question is this, as it's all crosswind technically vfly would be Vref30+5 or should it be Verf30+10 due to the gust factor?

I personally would fly +10 but I'm not sure. Any opinions?
pilotho is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 13:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vref+10, your fctm should have some example calculations.

edit: fcom to read fctm.

Last edited by flyburg; 14th Sep 2011 at 16:22.
flyburg is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2011, 13:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West Indies
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speed on approach.

If the reported wind is 90 degrees to the R/W then there will be a headwind as verified by your G/S. Engage the auto-throttle and see what speed the auto-throttle flies.....that's your answer.
dhardesthard is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2011, 13:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Vref+10 seems very sensible.
Remember that in gusty conditions the wind direction can swing as well as change strength, thus although the additive helps with the gust (control / stall margin) it could contribute to a higher GS if there is a tailwind component at touchdown; don’t forget to check the landing distance calculations for the worst case. 15 deg direction change at max gust?

dhardesthard don’t give the problem to automation; at best it might only give an out of date answer – what the wind was or averaged. Automation doesn’t think, pilots can and must think about the problem (threats) and consider a range of outcomes – think ahead.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2011, 14:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh well, if you don't take my word for this, simply look at the boeing FCTM! In the first chapter under command speed it will give you some sample calculations.

DHARDESTHARD, Use the automatics to come up with the answer?? Seriously dude, if you are a simmer or made a joke, you had me! If not, get out of the flying business!

PEI 3721, very sensible, also to be applied to take off calculations, but you knew this
flyburg is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2011, 15:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You add half the steady headwind component to a minimum of 5kts plus all the gust. So you should be flying Vref+15 in this case and hold the gust until touchdown, landing at Vref+10. Don't want to lose the gust in the flare! If autolanding Vref+5 is adequate according to Boeing.
in my last airline is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2011, 17:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not correct,

It is half the HWC plus the entire gust, with a minimum of five!!

Not, half the HWC with a minimum of 5 plus the entire gust, or 5 plus half the HWC plus the entire gust.
flyburg is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2011, 18:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West Indies
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's wrong with automation?

The autothrust does a much better job than any human can. It's inputs are much more current and accurate and it frees you up for other tasks. A pilot can only assimilate so much info and at a much slower rate. Where is he getting the info from? The tower wind is not at the threshold and is several seconds late plus it is rounded of to the nearest 10 degrees and nearest 5 knots. The INS or GPS data is much more accurate and this is what the automation uses so unless there is a malfunction I can see no cons to using the automation.
dhardesthard is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 13:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A/T will attempt to fly the speed selected in the MCP. Thus there first has to be human input; hence the question.

For max X w/v calculations your use steady wind + 1/2 gust. The minimum Vfly additive is +5 plus all gust. If the wind is really all X, but gusting I can't believe it will suddenly become all headwind. If it is from the right it might even become a little tail. Adding ALL the gust, with little headwind to reduce ground speed, could cause floating and all the associated consiquences. It is not an exact science, even though people make it out to be so. A modicum and airmanship is always a good idea.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 15:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airmanship is always a good idea. However only using half the gust factor is nowhere suggested in the boeing manuals. With the last revision we even got new wind limits which explicitly include the whole tower reported gust value for all wind limit calculation including crosswind.

Anyway, trusting the automatics is not completely bad, but especially in gusty conditions it is a very good idea to disconnect both autopilot and autothrust (remember: boeing recommends manual thrust in manual flight) and just fly it manually. A 30kt crosswind is out of limits by 5 kts for autoland anyway so you have to fly it manually at some point anyway. Additionally is the NG autothrust pretty slow and not the best thing to use in bad conditions.
Denti is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 18:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Flyburg, 100% correct. I think it was like I said in the old days but the new FCTM is as you said. Thanks.
in my last airline is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 19:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're welcome
flyburg is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 19:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,801
Received 122 Likes on 59 Posts
The autothrust does a much better job than any human can.
Rubbish.

Automation systems have advantages and limits and humans have advantages and limits.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2011, 21:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 398
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the Boeing 737NG FCTM dated June 30th 2010, pages 1.11 & 1.12

...the recommended method for approach speed correction is to add one half of the reported steady headwind component plus the full gust increment above the steady wind to the reference speed. The minimum command speed setting is VREF + 5 knots.....
When making adjustments for winds, the maximum approach speed should not exceed VREF + 20 knots or landing flap placard speed minus 5 knots, whichever is lower.
And
Note: Do not apply wind additives for tailwinds. Set command speed at VREF+ 5 knots (autothrottle engaged or disconnected).
Capt Chambo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.