Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

need help to figure this out

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

need help to figure this out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th September 2011 | 16:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: New Delhi
need help to figure this out

An aircraft leaves A at 1400, flying at Mach 0.84 (OAT – 58° C). The ETA B is 1436 and the distance between A and B is 300 nm. At what time must a speed adjustment be made if the arrival time is changed to 1438:
A) 1426.5
B) 1427.5
C) 1428.5
D) 1425.5


correct answer is d ...
i have been able to figure out the true TAS=480 and the planned TAS =500

what to do next...is whats bugging me i tried all the speed and time stuff i knew but its confusing the living daylights outta me
Shabez is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 18:40
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 57
From: GPS L INVALID
Either its too late for me and I cannot properly read the question or the question itself is incomplete - that depends on the speed adjustment! If the thing decelerates to 1 kts just before 1436 you can delay the arrival indefinetely... I dont get it.
STBYRUD is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 18:47
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
This is one of those stupid, pedantic questions that CAAs think is required if pilots. Just pull the Mach back as soon as you know you need to adjust the arrival time and see how it works out. You will NEVER have to do this in real life.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 18:49
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Mokum
as far i know mach 0.01 difference is 45 sec a hour about. but i don't get the question!
Iamneon is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 19:36
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 954
Likes: 5
From: USA
Yes, when assigned a time to cross the oceanic transition point, adjust the speed so that the FMS estimated time over waypoint matches!

I think you guys are right. The speed increment was not provided in the question.
westhawk is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 20:12
  #6 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 30
From: Texas
Ah, PROGRESS, page 3, RTA (Required Time At) in the 1R, check the RTA speed in the 2L is reasonable, back to drinking coffee.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2011 | 21:56
  #7 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 5
From: Chabanais, France
a speed adjustment
It would provide another side of the triangle if they told you what the speed adjustment was in kts.

Reminds me of the old plotting question, "At what time and what position would you need to leave your existing track from A to B in order to arrive over your Diversion field, C, at the same time as you would have arrived over your original destination B. 30 marks! (GS of moving base etc.). So useful to me at the time, flying the BN2 Islander!
parabellum is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2011 | 07:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Inter Nations
only thing i know is that you are reducing to about .81.
DutchOne is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2011 | 09:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi shabez,
the planned TAS =500
I think you'll find the ground speed was 500 kts.

You are missing the new Mach No. they will reduce to - else it's impossible.

Last edited by rudderrudderrat; 12th September 2011 at 11:04. Reason: typo
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2011 | 10:55
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Don't you just radio ahead and declare a fuel emergency?
Mike-Bracknell is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2011 | 08:18
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
It a slightly practical question as sometimes one has to cross
a point at a certain time for ATC separation.

Of course the earlier the better. If left it too late one may be
waaay back on speed to make any real difference timewise.

I'd say what the bugger is asking you, is do you realise the
earlier the better out of the four answers provided? Just my
hunch.
Slasher is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.