Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

need help to figure this out

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

need help to figure this out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2011, 16:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
need help to figure this out

An aircraft leaves A at 1400, flying at Mach 0.84 (OAT – 58° C). The ETA B is 1436 and the distance between A and B is 300 nm. At what time must a speed adjustment be made if the arrival time is changed to 1438:
A) 1426.5
B) 1427.5
C) 1428.5
D) 1425.5


correct answer is d ...
i have been able to figure out the true TAS=480 and the planned TAS =500

what to do next...is whats bugging me i tried all the speed and time stuff i knew but its confusing the living daylights outta me
Shabez is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 18:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either its too late for me and I cannot properly read the question or the question itself is incomplete - that depends on the speed adjustment! If the thing decelerates to 1 kts just before 1436 you can delay the arrival indefinetely... I dont get it.
STBYRUD is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 18:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
This is one of those stupid, pedantic questions that CAAs think is required if pilots. Just pull the Mach back as soon as you know you need to adjust the arrival time and see how it works out. You will NEVER have to do this in real life.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 18:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mokum
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as far i know mach 0.01 difference is 45 sec a hour about. but i don't get the question!
Iamneon is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 19:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, when assigned a time to cross the oceanic transition point, adjust the speed so that the FMS estimated time over waypoint matches!

I think you guys are right. The speed increment was not provided in the question.
westhawk is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 20:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah, PROGRESS, page 3, RTA (Required Time At) in the 1R, check the RTA speed in the 2L is reasonable, back to drinking coffee.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 21:56
  #7 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,093
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a speed adjustment
It would provide another side of the triangle if they told you what the speed adjustment was in kts.

Reminds me of the old plotting question, "At what time and what position would you need to leave your existing track from A to B in order to arrive over your Diversion field, C, at the same time as you would have arrived over your original destination B. 30 marks! (GS of moving base etc.). So useful to me at the time, flying the BN2 Islander!
parabellum is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 07:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inter Nations
Age: 40
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
only thing i know is that you are reducing to about .81.
DutchOne is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 09:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi shabez,
the planned TAS =500
I think you'll find the ground speed was 500 kts.

You are missing the new Mach No. they will reduce to - else it's impossible.

Last edited by rudderrudderrat; 12th Sep 2011 at 11:04. Reason: typo
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 10:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't you just radio ahead and declare a fuel emergency?
Mike-Bracknell is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 08:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It a slightly practical question as sometimes one has to cross
a point at a certain time for ATC separation.

Of course the earlier the better. If left it too late one may be
waaay back on speed to make any real difference timewise.

I'd say what the bugger is asking you, is do you realise the
earlier the better out of the four answers provided? Just my
hunch.
Slasher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.