Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus (320) Vapp determination

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus (320) Vapp determination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2011, 06:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bagot Community
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus (320) Vapp determination

I am bit confused about how to determine Vapp, in particular in these conditons :
- no ice accretion
- no auto-thrust
- no autoland
- nil wind
- normal conditions (ie. no failures)

FCOM 3.04.10 (operating speeds definitions) says :

VAPP = VLS + wind correction.
The wind correction is limited to a minimum of 5 knots and a maximum of 15
knots.
However, in the QRH 4.00 (Vapp Determination) it says :

Vapp = MAX (Vls +5 , Vls + wind correction)

Vls + 5 knot only if autothrust is used or autoland
wind correction = 1/3 headwind
So, according to the QRH, in the above conditions, Vapp = Vls ?

However FCOM says Vapp = Vls + 5 (minimum) ?

Now do we add the extra 5 knots to Vls (in the specified conditions) or not ?

Doesn't the QRH contradict or the FCOM or I can't read ?
Bagot_Community_Locator is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 08:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,
Look at QRH 4.02 Landing Dist without autobrakes.
It runs through an example of the minimum Landing Distance required, without auto thrust, at VLS, using manual brakes.
If you use (VLS+5) then add 8%.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 08:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FCOM 3.04.10 p4 (SEQ001 REV24) says
VAPP = VLS + wind correction + 5 knots
Increment required if autoland or A/THR or ice accretion or gusty crosswind >20kts
*
FCOM 4.00A (SEQ130 REV42) says
Vapp (2) = VLS + 5kt (1) + WIND CORR
Note (1) 5kts increment required for A/THR or autoland (irrelevant in your case)
Note (2) Increment if ice accretion (again irrelevant)
*
No conflict between the two sections ?
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 21:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: United States of Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check your revision number! The older a/c have 5 kt plus wind corr. The new ones 5kt/wind corr. whichever is more. (5kt only when athr used).
OPEN DES is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2011, 01:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagot_Community_Locator
I am bit confused about how to determine Vapp, in particular in these conditons :
- no ice accretion
- no auto-thrust
- no autoland
- nil wind
- normal conditions (ie. no failures)
If you follow FCOM or QRH, with no wind and no auto-thrust, Vapp will be Vls.
You can fly at Vls, but I don't suspect that a lot of people will do it, since you don't have a margin below your speed and your landing will not be so smooth. (However, actual landing distances are calculated with Vapp=Vls)

Where I work, we always fly the Vapp calculated by the FMGS when flying without auto-thrust. So always with the 5kts increment.
No need to calculate the Vapp if your FMGS does it for you. (No failure case)
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2011, 11:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe you are checking the FCOM 3 of one MSN and the QRH of another?
there are slight differences in VAPP computing depending on the model.
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2011, 18:39
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bagot Community
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QRH REV 42

FCOM 3.04.10 REV 24

Both apply to same SN, same model

My copy of the FCOM only says :

VAPP = VLS + wind correction.
The wind correction is limited to a minimum of 5 knots and a maximum of 15
knots.
The flight crew may modify VAPP through the MCDU.
– During autoland or when A/THR is on or in case of ice accretion or gusty
crosswind greater than 20 knots, VAPP must not be lower than VLS + 5
knots.
It does not say Vapp = VLS + wind correction + 5 knots.

My copy of the QRH says :
Vapp = MAX (Vls +5 , Vls + wind correction)

Vls + 5 knot only if autothrust is used or autoland
wind correction = 1/3 headwind
It does not say Vapp (2) = VLS + 5kt (1) + WIND CORR .

It has got 2 options :
- Vls + 5 (+ 5 if auto-thrust)
- Vls + wind correction
whichever is greater.

I am confused about the FCOM statement
+ wind correction" minimum of 5 knots.
That this mean :
a - you always add a minimum of 5 knots for wind correction ? (wind or no wind)
or
b - you only add the 5 knot minimum wind correction only if any wind ?

I interpret the FCOM that you always must apply a min 5 knot wind correction, from the statement
The wind correction is limited to a minimum of 5 knots
However I interpret the QRH as saying you don't need the + 5 knots if no wind and no auto-thrust.
Bagot_Community_Locator is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2011, 20:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FCOM 3.04.10 is the chapter of Operating Speeds Definition.

Read the entire definition:

VAPP
Final approach speed
Displayed on MCDU APPR page
Calculated by the FMGCs
Represents: Vapp = Vls + wind correction

The Wind correction is limited to a minimum of 5 knots and a maximum of 15 knots.
The flight crew may modify Vapp through the MCDU.
– During autoland or when A/THR is on or in case of ice accretion or gusty
crosswind greater than 20 knots, VAPP must not be lower than VLS + 5
knots.


To me, this means that the FMGC will always add 5kts minimum to the Vls for the Vapp calculation. So it will always cover the 5kts increment for autoland, auto-thrust and gusty crosswind, since it doesn't know if you will fly with auto-thrust or not or if you have gusty crosswind.

If you want to calculate the Vapp yourself, you're in the wrong chapter of the FCOM. Calculation is explained in the QRH.
FCOM 3.04.10 is only the definition of Vapp, not the calculation.

So in case of:
-No wind
-Approach without auto-thrust
-No ice
the FMCG will give you a Vapp = Vls + 5kts.
You can however change the Vapp in the MCDU to a manually calculated Vapp = Vls according QRH.

The only reason for landing with Vls I can think of, would be a very short runway. (Close to required landing distance)
Or according overweight landing checklist.




Not sure if I'm correct, just my opinion about it.
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 01:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: in the heat
Age: 52
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?

If your doing a half decent rating ask your instructor!

Oh and SmartCockpit - Airline training guides, Aviation, Operations, Safety is a great aid.



Actually even if your doing a 2bit rating, ask your instructor.
JMEN is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 03:26
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bagot Community
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ask your instructor.
I won't bother.

Whilst doing my type rating, I asked my instructor many questions.

Often she couldn't answer and would have to ask someone else. Other times she would answer but then you look it up in the books to realise she gave the wrong answer. She had no time on type either apart from the simulator type rating. Why bother.

Welcome to low cost training

I think pprune (tech log) is the best resource
Bagot_Community_Locator is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 03:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
BCL obviously an Aussie so I am guessing that you are doing your endo at an American aircraft manufacturer's facility in Brisbane? You are correct that you will get better info from Tech Log.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 04:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
amazing

so the mistery is that the + 5kt is considered as a part of wind correction, right?
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 10:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: in the heat
Age: 52
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fark

I hope you are joking!

How the fcuk can a type rating instructor not know the basics.

Go on ask what the max application to Vapp is, that should get you an interesting answer.

If its not a joke, a Aussie type rating or O/S?

It is !
JMEN is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2011, 10:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
an American aircraft manufacturer's facility in Brisbane
... and they charge $5000 over their competitor just for the privilege of including a printed set of FCOMs instead of loading them on a USB stick for no extra charge ...
ReverseFlight is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.