Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Boeing 747-400 Flap Load Relief

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Boeing 747-400 Flap Load Relief

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2011, 14:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing 747-400 Flap Load Relief

Good evening colleagues,

I just encountered a problem I couldnīt solve for the moment.

The 744 has a flap load relief function, so if you are in configuration 30 they retract to 25 if you pass the red band by more than 5 kts.

But in case of an unreliable airspeed you cannot thrust these red bands, so what will happen with that flap load relief when all the three airspeed indicators are lost?
Will it work, and based on which speed? It canīt be the groundspeed because the aircraft cannot correct it with the present wind!


P737!
Piloteur737 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 15:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East England
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly got an issue with Mircrsoft Flight Simulator???

aa) The 'Airspeed Indicators' have no influence on this, the only display is a computed airspeed tape on the Primary Flight Display. The display does not influence the flaps.
bb) The aircraft has 3 ADIRUs to compute the Airspeed to display (except the Stand by Indicator which has a direct Pitot and Static line (not on all B744))..and 3 Flap Control Units to sort the flap position. Airspeed data is fed to the Flap control units and many other systems by ARINC 429 data bus from the ADIRUs.
cc) Where would Ground Speed come in to this? The issue is Dynamic pressure on the Flaps for structural concerns so only the 'Indicated' IAS or more likely CAS would influence this.
dd) If all 3 are lost then fly very carefully, and there would be no overspeed protection....probably the least of your worries at that time!
spannersatKL is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 17:36
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey spannersatKL, you funny guy.

Maybe my question was misleading.

The flapsī only reference concerning flap load relief function are that red bands? This is not really mentioned in the Volume 2, where flap load relief is just a very small subsection.
In this case you could with unreliable airspeed never extend your flaps to 30, because you are (with 3 false indications on all the three speed indicators) always within this red band.
And the aircraft did not know you are within an unreliable airspeed.

So whats the reference for the flap load relief function?


P737
Piloteur737 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 19:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 164 Likes on 76 Posts
Long time since I worked on the 744 but I believe that if the FCU's have invalid speed data, an EICAS status message is displayed and flap load relief is inhibited.
Avionker is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 03:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my engineering training notes, a Status Message "FLAP LOAD RELIEF" appears if Air Data is lost (I assume this signifies that the function is lost).

My notes only mention specific airspeeds. They may or may not correlate to PFD red bands. There is hysteresis in the logic. The flaps do not return to their original positions at the same speed as they started to retract.

Rgds
NSEU

ADIRUs on 744s, Spanners???
NSEU is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 18:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East England
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apologies NSEU! IRS... You are right. My bus training getting in the way! Havn't touched a 744 for a year or 5.....
spannersatKL is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 23:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spanners
Havn't touched a 744 for a year or 5.....
Sorry to hear that, Spanners I dread the day I'll have to move on to Airbuses and the like.
NSEU is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2011, 02:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to hear that, Spanners I dread the day I'll have to move on to Airbuses and the like.
A bit of sentiment here, cut my teeth on the 742 as a young line/avionic tech. Would seem logical that NCD would negate protection in modern aircraft. Makes me think of the 727 and DC-9 that had seperate pitot probes for elevator load feel (different issue).
grounded27 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.