Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

SQ A380 Returns To LHR

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

SQ A380 Returns To LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2011, 21:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SQ A380 Returns To LHR

2345 20 May/'11

Flightradar24.com's Photos - Wall Photos | Facebook

Engine failure
Unable to dump fuel
Overweight landing
8 wheels on main/body gear replaced.
unmanned transport is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 07:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,548
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Why'd it land in the water?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 07:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Subterranea
Age: 70
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why was it unable to dump fuel? Engine failure should not prevent dumping fuel, or was it more than an engine failure?
Green-dot is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 08:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockholm - Sweden
Age: 33
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondering why the only source I've found about this is Flightradar. No info on Avherald and in the mainstream media. Should be a quite big deal reporting about it considering the past.
Emil Almestad is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 18:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one is very hush hush for some weird reason. Media ban implemented !
22 hrs delay.
The engine was changed.
unmanned transport is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 23:09
  #6 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking to SQ crew yesterday the A380 has had more than it's fair share of turn backs after take off, for various reasons and this has earned it the nick name of "The 180".

A contained engine failure on a four engine aircraft is usually no 'big deal', being unable to dump fuel is.

Exactly who had the authority to issue a 'media ban'?
parabellum is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 06:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The 180"
LOL

BTW Very curious about the fueldump issue.

I know an urban legend of an early 'bus starting to dump fuel by itself when the pilots were fiddling the FMS with a simulated diversion. Since the aircraft was above MLW it decided to get rid of some weight....

Wonder if any of both stories is true...
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 07:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one is very hush hush for some weird reason. Media ban implemented !
22 hrs delay.
The engine was changed.
Where did they change the engine, it certainly wasn't done at Heathrow.
Fargoo is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 08:20
  #9 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airplane is not building a lot of confidence.

Is it a 180 or an A180?
aterpster is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 13:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Age: 72
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SIA321 turn around LHR

Hi
whats all that about engine and coverup ???
Here is some facts :

Singapore A388 near Amsterdam on May 20th 2011, electrical problems
Incident: Singapore A388 near Amsterdam on May 20th 2011, electrical problems

http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...eturn-lhr.html

Best Regards

scanhorse is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 14:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As it appears to be unmanned transport's mission in life to prove RR's triple spool engines, and apparently also the A380, an inferior product I would bring somewhat more than a pinch of salt when digesting any of his posts.

Anyhow, as the MLW and MZFW delta across all the weight variants of the A380 is between 20 and 25 tonnes and it is not possible to dump fuel from the engine feed tanks (which have a combined capacity of around 91 tonnes) it does not take a slide rule to figure out that the purpose of the jettison system is not to bring the weight down to MLW or below.
KBPsen is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 16:26
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A380 is a good product, just has a few teething problems like the others that went before it.
unmanned transport is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 19:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any news on that hush hush extremely rapid engine change?
Fargoo is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 19:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KBPsen

You and I must be the only ones here to know what is a slide rule.

It went the way of carbon paper. But it taught me so much.
oldchina is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 20:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Be it engine or electrical related seems rather serious, especially in view on the overweight landing.
atakacs is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 21:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not really... If the FCOM says you can do it, there's no reason why you shouldn't. As I've always understood it, electrical glitches are fairly common in the first couple of years of service...
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 01:20
  #17 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oldchina:


You and I must be the only ones here to know what is a slide rule.

It went the way of carbon paper. But it taught me so much.
The slide rule was great but carbon paper sucked.
aterpster is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 01:32
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: India
Age: 72
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For your info carbon paper is still widely used in India
ventus2cxt is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 02:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I've always understood it, electrical glitches are fairly common in the first couple of years of service...
In my experience, electrical glitches are more common in the last couple of years of service.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 05:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
vapilot2204 said "In my experience, electrical glitches are more common in the last couple of years of service."

A sure sign of a rushed production line.

This incident does seem weirdly covered up. "The passengers were in no danger." Nonsense, they blew 8 tires on landing! That's danger!

-drl
deSitter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.