737 Question on emergency retraction of landing gear on ground
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
737 Question on emergency retraction of landing gear on ground
Hypothetical Scenario.
For whatever reason, assume a B737 has total brake failure on landing leaving only reverse thrust to slow the aircraft down. The decision is made to retract the landing gear to avoid a disastrous over-run.
Would the landing gear retract on the ground by using the landing gear lever over-ride trigger? Or would you need to pull the air/ground switch circuit breaker to permit the landing gear over-ride switch to do its job? I realise the landing gear over-ride trigger is to cater for a case where the gear does not retract after take off.
For whatever reason, assume a B737 has total brake failure on landing leaving only reverse thrust to slow the aircraft down. The decision is made to retract the landing gear to avoid a disastrous over-run.
Would the landing gear retract on the ground by using the landing gear lever over-ride trigger? Or would you need to pull the air/ground switch circuit breaker to permit the landing gear over-ride switch to do its job? I realise the landing gear over-ride trigger is to cater for a case where the gear does not retract after take off.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The override trigger will be enough, but all that will happen is that the nose gear retracts and you get a nasty nose slide. The override trigger bypasses the lock that usually prevents the lever from being selected up by means of a solenoid as long as there is weight on wheels. The main gears won't budge most likely because of the excessive sideways friction, but the nose gear will probably move up. Just one question here from me: Why ?
In this situation you would be better to simply steer onto the grass off the runway once the reverse has done most of the braking, then if necessary (if the ground is so hard that the wheels don't break through the surface, slowing the aircraft) ground-loop the plane. The energy absorbed by tearing off the gear increases the crash survivability, and keeping the aircraft on the airport maintains RFFS access.
For whatever reason, assume a B737 has total brake failure on landing leaving only reverse thrust to slow the aircraft down. The decision is made to retract the landing gear to avoid a disastrous over-run.
First there haven't been a whole lot experiences with large transport landings with landing gear up.
Second, whose to say that the braking differences between sliding on your belly across the grass is different than ploughing through the grass on your gear. Of course this presumes that there is a modicum of unpaved overrun area rather than a cliff.
Third you may be more likely to slide off the runway heading with a gear up (probably can't steer around an obstacle)
I suppose that there is an optimum speed vs remaining runway where a gear up might be postulated to be better, but who's to make that decision?
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main reason the main gear won't retract in this scenario (in additon to side friction forces) is that the gear leg passes through the vertical to overcentre during extension. Therefore in reverse the gear and hydraulics would have to be able to "raise" the whole aeroplane a couple of inches as it scribes that arc in reverse.
As for the nose gear, same principle in terms of arc described but possibly because of the lever arm between it and the main gear it might just retract but I don't know.
The point of this design of course is to try to keep gear in correct postion if downlock should fail.
As for the nose gear, same principle in terms of arc described but possibly because of the lever arm between it and the main gear it might just retract but I don't know.
The point of this design of course is to try to keep gear in correct postion if downlock should fail.
first the gear, then the engines....lots of stuff in the way before you get to the belly....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but the nose gear will probably move up. Just one question here from me: Why ?
The incident brought up the technical issues involved with pulling the gear up using the over-ride trigger on the landing gear lever. Pprune is the best place to ask around as there are very experienced and knowledgeable people that read Pprune who do not necessarily contribute unless it is in their area of expertese. The various answers were most instructive especially the points about only the nose-wheel retracting by use of the landing gear over-ride switch. Thank you all, for your replies.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For whatever reason, assume a B737 has total brake failure on landing leaving only reverse thrust to slow the aircraft down.
To prevent this happening, consideration should be given to cutting the start levers while still in in full reverse, the moment the aircraft stops under full reverse. That way any forward thrust vanishes and the aircraft hopefully will not move forward
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Us engineers usually have call to power up the hydraulics and select gear up on the ramp after a brake change, many aircraft types make use of 'gear up' hyd pressure to apply wheel retraction brakes and we need to do a hydraulic leak check. The gear pins are fitted and these will prevent retraction but on a few occasions they've been left out; result is the nose gear collapses but the mains usually can't lift the aircraft. No matter how quick you are to put the lever 'down' again, the nose hyds can't lift the plane back up!
I believe BA at Cardiff had a partial retraction of the body mains on a 747 when leaving the hangar, but as far as I remember the wing mains didn't move.
I believe BA at Cardiff had a partial retraction of the body mains on a 747 when leaving the hangar, but as far as I remember the wing mains didn't move.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can 737 brakes fail with serviceable hydraulics.
Whilst there could be some rare combination of failures which results in a total brake failure, it should not be assumed that this is necessarily part of the certificated simulation package (#12).
In the few simulator certifications in which I participated, the required list of aircraft / sim matches was surprisingly small and limited in scope, and often the accuracy of the match was poor.
It is more likely that human ingenuity has found a mechanism to simulate a failure, which perhaps is being used without sufficient thought to the realism or probability of the scenario.
Reviewing accident statistics it would be of greater benefit to consider an impending runway overrun, but there again the arguments predominantly against drastic action, as above, would apply. But as with many ‘accident’ scenarios the contributions to an overrun can and should be identified before the event – before landing; isn’t there something similar for brake (hydraulic) failure – a system warning.
An overrun situation might have grater benefit for safety training, but if the objective was to get the crew to think, then consider a pre landing decision where the brakes / hydraulics were suspect and a ‘total’ failure might occur (‘might’ as in probability, likelihood, and system knowledge), the form of discussion / consideration in this thread.
In the few simulator certifications in which I participated, the required list of aircraft / sim matches was surprisingly small and limited in scope, and often the accuracy of the match was poor.
It is more likely that human ingenuity has found a mechanism to simulate a failure, which perhaps is being used without sufficient thought to the realism or probability of the scenario.
Reviewing accident statistics it would be of greater benefit to consider an impending runway overrun, but there again the arguments predominantly against drastic action, as above, would apply. But as with many ‘accident’ scenarios the contributions to an overrun can and should be identified before the event – before landing; isn’t there something similar for brake (hydraulic) failure – a system warning.
An overrun situation might have grater benefit for safety training, but if the objective was to get the crew to think, then consider a pre landing decision where the brakes / hydraulics were suspect and a ‘total’ failure might occur (‘might’ as in probability, likelihood, and system knowledge), the form of discussion / consideration in this thread.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One example that comes to mind is the Gimli Glider, crash landing of a fuel starved 767; the collapsed nose wheel helped slow it down.
Gimli Glider - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gimli Glider - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one thing to remember is that in this unlikely scenario, one might have sufficent OOMPH to get the plane an inch off the ground and then try to retract the gear.
but please...the way I was taught to fly was simply this...hit your spot, on target speed and try to be in an energy state to pretty much coast to a stop.
now I know jets have residual thrust at idle and if you were not able to deploy reversers, one plane I know states in the manual to shut down one engine on the runway to minimize residual idle thrust (nutty, I know)....while keeping one engine for hyd.
I have heard the scenario of retracting the gear as a desperate stop method for another type of plane...but please, just don't get yourself into a situation that you have to try it.
but please...the way I was taught to fly was simply this...hit your spot, on target speed and try to be in an energy state to pretty much coast to a stop.
now I know jets have residual thrust at idle and if you were not able to deploy reversers, one plane I know states in the manual to shut down one engine on the runway to minimize residual idle thrust (nutty, I know)....while keeping one engine for hyd.
I have heard the scenario of retracting the gear as a desperate stop method for another type of plane...but please, just don't get yourself into a situation that you have to try it.