Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Intermixed Engines Operations

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Intermixed Engines Operations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2011, 00:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maracay - Venezuela
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intermixed Engines Operations

Hi all.
I'm at last in the right place!
Thanks for the welcome!

I'll start with a tricky one - from my layman's optic though.

Are intermixed engines operations a common practice in the US? Worldwide?
Under whose approval or regulations?
Manufacturers?
Do airplanes have built in provitions for this conditions?
Experimental? On active passanger carriers?
Heavy burden to count the Q's you experts surely would dig out.
One last thought: might it be common practice in some forgoten regions far from aviation regulation agencies/authorities?

Thanks anticipated.

WannEDbe
WannEDbe is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 01:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we mixed JT8D 7's an d 9's all the time on the DC9...slight pilot adustment and off you go...set slightly different power

mind you, its easier to have two of the same engines
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 02:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the distant past, I have operated the L1011 with engine intermix, IE: -200 aircraft (two RB.211-524B02 and one -22B engines).
-22B (lower thrust) procedures are used on all three engines, reduced second segment climb performance, lower enroute altitude capability, and the engine intermix was allowed for only thirty days, by the regulatory authority.

All in all, a pain.
411A is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 02:57
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maracay - Venezuela
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sevenstrokeroll

[quote]
we mixed JT8D 7's an d 9's all the time on the DC9...slight pilot adustment and off you go...set slightly different power


This is a good start. The legal issue is still pending.
And yes, easier to have them paired and surely more cost effetive.
WannEDbe is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 03:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA, Ireland
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are no legal issues at all. It is all allowed per the AFM on the DC-9.
acebaxter is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 03:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intermixed -15 and -17 on the 727. We were not allowed to do reduced thrust takeoffs with intermix. A bit vague now but I believe the reduced thrust was based on setting N1's for us and with intermix, they would be different values for different models.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 03:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Done it on 747-400s with CFM6s and FADEC. You have to change the engine control card (whatever that is) for the relevant engine position and the FADEC did the rest, apart from using the performance charts for the lower rated engine.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 04:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it seems to me that I have also done an intermix on the 737-200 (also JT8D)...doable but I didn't like it.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2011, 11:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Part of the "Super 27" conversion, -217s outboard and one -15 or -17 in the middle, going empty with a flaps 5 takeoff makes for a rocket ship.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2011, 09:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We'd have intermixs on 727s at times. Boeing and the FAA were both happy. As I recall, it was only 7s and 9s, no 15s and lower. We'd do all the performance numbers based on -7 and set -7 EPRs across the board. As Jammed Stab said, no reduced thrust (some folks think a -7 is reduced thrust anyway.)
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2011, 12:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WannEDbe
Under whose approval or regulations? Manufacturers?
Intermix must be approved under the airworthiness certification of the airplane. The beginning of the chain of approval is usually the manufacturer, who applies for it under the Type Certificate, and covers it in the Airplane Flight Manual, which is 'attached' to the airworthiness certificate of the individual airplane. The applicable regulations are, in principle, those of the state of registry of the airplane, whose authority issues the CofA. In practice, in most cases the state of registry accepts the regulation applicable in the state of manufacture as being equivalent to its own.

regards,
HN39

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 20th Feb 2011 at 13:00.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2011, 13:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also true for the A320 Series. FCOM 2.4.45 Ps 1-3 gives details of permissible intermix operations between CFM 56 SAC/DAC/TI engines.
mcdhu is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2011, 14:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South of N90º00'.0
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same on the A330's
PappyJ is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2011, 18:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for the fellows who have done intermix with non-JT8D engines.... Were you allowed to do reduced thrust ops?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2011, 02:03
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maracay - Venezuela
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HN39.

Thanks.

My queries have been answered sufficiently. I trust all "big leaguers" have the capability for engine intermixing. And your post definitely shuts out all doubts as to the legitimacy of the procedures

Regards
WannEDbe.
WannEDbe is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2011, 02:40
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JammedStab
Question for the fellows who have done intermix with non-JT8D engines.... Were you allowed to do reduced thrust ops?
Not mentioned above, but there are intermix options for various CF34 variants on the Bombardier CRJs, and reduced thrust takeoffs are I believe still permitted when intermixing; I can't recall any prohibition about it.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2013, 22:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ecuador
Age: 46
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
question -15 and -9 intermix

Hi my name is Pablo and I work IME Fae in Ecuador, we have a 727 100 , actually it has 2 jt8d-9 and we have a -15 so in the AMM of Boeing shows that there is possible make the intermix so is it really possible or not.
Thanks.for your attention
pablodonosoi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.