RNP airbus driver
Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: italy
RNP airbus driver
Hi guys,
somebody can explain me the RNP procedure reported in fcom 2.4.46 for brnav, rnp4 or rnp10?
I understood that I can insert my required accuracy (4-5-10) on prog page, but what is the redial equivalent?
thanks for your help
Michelda
somebody can explain me the RNP procedure reported in fcom 2.4.46 for brnav, rnp4 or rnp10?
I understood that I can insert my required accuracy (4-5-10) on prog page, but what is the redial equivalent?
thanks for your help
Michelda
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I think you meant "radial", in which case there is no equivalent. The accuracy requirements for RNP and RNAV are completely different than anything for ground based navaids.
If you can get your hands on Airbus's "Getting to grips with modern navigation, version 5", it is an excellent primer. www.smartcockpit.com has version 4 dating from 2002 but it's still good information.
If you can get your hands on Airbus's "Getting to grips with modern navigation, version 5", it is an excellent primer. www.smartcockpit.com has version 4 dating from 2002 but it's still good information.
Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: italy
Thanks engfireleft
I meant radial........I have that getting to grip, but.......
I write for you the procedure for rnp10 (is the same for 4 or 5 but with different number).....
if a manual entry of accuracy is desired, the flight crew must manually enter: for rnp 10, enter 10 NM or use the radial equivalent to 10 NM XTK accuracy that is 12.2 NM.
ciao
Michelda
I meant radial........I have that getting to grip, but.......
I write for you the procedure for rnp10 (is the same for 4 or 5 but with different number).....
if a manual entry of accuracy is desired, the flight crew must manually enter: for rnp 10, enter 10 NM or use the radial equivalent to 10 NM XTK accuracy that is 12.2 NM.
ciao
Michelda
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Oh I see. I've never considered using crosstrack on the CDI as the RNP integrity alerting is triggered off the RNP value entered in the PROG page. The crosstrack on the map display is an indication of where the airplane thinks it is in relation to the calculated track. The EPE of the airplane is a calculation of how accurate that track is. Two separate things.
I'm not sure about 4 and 5, but RNP 10 oceanic airspace does not require RNP alerting. Non-GPS equipment is certified for various periods of time from their last alignment or DME update. Airbus FMGC use a more or less linear formula in non-gps airplanes to increase the EPE once IRS only navigation begins, but the values have no connection to how the kit is actually performing. As long as you don't exceed the time you're good to go.
Sorry I couldn't be more help.
I'm not sure about 4 and 5, but RNP 10 oceanic airspace does not require RNP alerting. Non-GPS equipment is certified for various periods of time from their last alignment or DME update. Airbus FMGC use a more or less linear formula in non-gps airplanes to increase the EPE once IRS only navigation begins, but the values have no connection to how the kit is actually performing. As long as you don't exceed the time you're good to go.
Sorry I couldn't be more help.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Miami
The RNP requirement that you refer to is an Oceanic requirement that you will likely never exceed unless you fly an ACJ. It use to apply more often when the A320 family was not equipped with GPS Primary.
In short, RNP-10 it limits the Navigation without ground based NAV's to 6.2 hrs from ground alignment and to 5.7 hrs from inflight update with a ground based NAV. This limits go to RNP-4 with GPS Primary.
With the range of the A320 family, except the ACJ, it is very hard to exceed this limitations. We took them into account during North Atlantic ferrys, but never came close.
As far as the paragraph on the mode of entry in the MCDU PROG page, it is a technicality; it mentions the Radial Equivalent as per certain regulations, but the common way of entering it would be 10NM or 4 NM.
The "normal" radials we refer to a VOR do not apply here, it is just RNP.
Hope it helps!
G
In short, RNP-10 it limits the Navigation without ground based NAV's to 6.2 hrs from ground alignment and to 5.7 hrs from inflight update with a ground based NAV. This limits go to RNP-4 with GPS Primary.
With the range of the A320 family, except the ACJ, it is very hard to exceed this limitations. We took them into account during North Atlantic ferrys, but never came close.
As far as the paragraph on the mode of entry in the MCDU PROG page, it is a technicality; it mentions the Radial Equivalent as per certain regulations, but the common way of entering it would be 10NM or 4 NM.
The "normal" radials we refer to a VOR do not apply here, it is just RNP.
Hope it helps!
G
Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: italy
Hy guiones
Thank you for your help.
I fly A321 and A330 in etops operations and the procedure is the same...I guess that also on A340.
I think that procedure on fcom 2.04.46 is a little bit misleading....
Michelda
Thank you for your help.
I fly A321 and A330 in etops operations and the procedure is the same...I guess that also on A340.
I think that procedure on fcom 2.04.46 is a little bit misleading....
Michelda
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
I see
It is not very clear.
So you can choose between inserting 5 or 6.2 when in BRNAV airspace?
or between 10 and 12.6 when in RNP 10 airspace?
Obviously everybody would select the higher one, since it is less restrictive.
It is not very clear.
So you can choose between inserting 5 or 6.2 when in BRNAV airspace?
or between 10 and 12.6 when in RNP 10 airspace?
Obviously everybody would select the higher one, since it is less restrictive.





