Runway Length
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't think it's a "standard" per se - but I can think of practical considerations: neighborhood property values, etc.
And then there's the TOGW issue: with more runway available, some planes might be able to carry more payload (or fuel), but then you can run into tire speed limits (higher Vr) or other physical issues.
Given present technology, there's probably little payoff in a longer runway.
And then there's the TOGW issue: with more runway available, some planes might be able to carry more payload (or fuel), but then you can run into tire speed limits (higher Vr) or other physical issues.
Given present technology, there's probably little payoff in a longer runway.
Prof. Airport Engineer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia (mostly)
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure how standard the 12,000 feet is. 12,000 feet = 3658m (since I think in metres these days). It's a useful length, with a 747-400 getting off in that length at MTOW and at standard ISA and 3000 feet airport elevation, or at ISA + 17 oC and 1500 feet airport elevation. As Sir GC says, the 747 dominated new airport design for many years, and many airports have been built to that sort of design. My observations over the last few years though have been around three different classes of runway length. These have been designed as (and these are not necessarily representative of existing airports):
- 2600m (8500 ft), allowing widebody aircraft flying shortish (5 hour) flights and narrow bodies most everywhere,
- 3300m (10,800 ft) allowing widebodies flying serious intercontinental distances,
- 4500m (14,750) ft) which seems to be preserve of various sheiks trying to outdo the neighbouring sheik.
barit1 touched on a couple of useful points. Firstly, with modern technology, there is little point indeed in longer runways. The widebody twins can haul a big load off a short runway, and designs for the A330 class aircraft are now for shorter runways. Secondly, and a big problem, is the advent of runway end safety areas (RESAs). These add a current required 90m at each end of the runway, or future 240m at each end. It has substantially changed the overall length needed and for new airports, I now automatically add half a kilometre to any planning length of a runway or airport for the RESAs, and that causes a lot of angst.
- 2600m (8500 ft), allowing widebody aircraft flying shortish (5 hour) flights and narrow bodies most everywhere,
- 3300m (10,800 ft) allowing widebodies flying serious intercontinental distances,
- 4500m (14,750) ft) which seems to be preserve of various sheiks trying to outdo the neighbouring sheik.
barit1 touched on a couple of useful points. Firstly, with modern technology, there is little point indeed in longer runways. The widebody twins can haul a big load off a short runway, and designs for the A330 class aircraft are now for shorter runways. Secondly, and a big problem, is the advent of runway end safety areas (RESAs). These add a current required 90m at each end of the runway, or future 240m at each end. It has substantially changed the overall length needed and for new airports, I now automatically add half a kilometre to any planning length of a runway or airport for the RESAs, and that causes a lot of angst.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: FL250
Age: 43
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emergency Landing point for a Space Shuttle maybe ?
Just kidding there, I thought the normal runway length was 10,000 Ft. Anyway, another reason I could think of is, due to safety and better usage of the runway. Could be that they need longer taxi way to accomodate more traffic ...so a longer runway?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Runway Length
IMO, airport runway length is a result of what an individual airport businesses are, e.g., if they are a major airfreight hub besides passenger service, the runways will be longer. Also, in the USA, some commercial airports once were military air force bases or even today, serve both functions and some are at high altitude and can be hot during the summer months such as Denver's airport.
I have attached an airport master planning review for the Dayton, Ohio international Airport that discusses in some detail runway lengths based on aircraft. Surprisingly the recommended runway length for a B737-900 series MTOW is 12,800 feet (3,900 meters).
http://www.landrum-brown.com/MasterP...t%202-9-05.pdf
Also, the FAA gives design recommendations and requirements for runways in the document below:
AC 150/5325-4B - Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design - Document Information
At JFK International, the most used 14,572 ft (4423 meters) runway 13R/31L was intended to be a backup runway for the Space Shuttle although it hasn't been used for this purpose. It was recently repaved in concrete and widened to 200 ft for the Airbus A-380.
I have attached an airport master planning review for the Dayton, Ohio international Airport that discusses in some detail runway lengths based on aircraft. Surprisingly the recommended runway length for a B737-900 series MTOW is 12,800 feet (3,900 meters).
http://www.landrum-brown.com/MasterP...t%202-9-05.pdf
Also, the FAA gives design recommendations and requirements for runways in the document below:
AC 150/5325-4B - Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design - Document Information
At JFK International, the most used 14,572 ft (4423 meters) runway 13R/31L was intended to be a backup runway for the Space Shuttle although it hasn't been used for this purpose. It was recently repaved in concrete and widened to 200 ft for the Airbus A-380.
Prof. Airport Engineer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia (mostly)
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Turbine D for the links. I'm a little surprised at the runway length for a 737-900 at Dayton. I read the FAA document, and in the Appendix 3, they actually give an example using the 737-900. Coincidently at the same elevation and design temperature as the Dayton study. That FAA example was a runway length of 9,000 feet - not 12,800 feet - which fits better with my experiences.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi OverRun,
I noticed that difference as well before yesterday's post and thought I would return to the two links to see what the differences might be. I have done that and I can't account for the Dayton airport planning recommendation. The two main parallel runways for all purposes are flat, no change in elevation from one end to the other. There are periods during the summer when the ambient temperatures exceed 90℉ (32.2°C), but that shouldn't increase recommended runway length by 3,800 ft. So I am at a loss to explain the difference between the two recommendations.
Turbine D
I noticed that difference as well before yesterday's post and thought I would return to the two links to see what the differences might be. I have done that and I can't account for the Dayton airport planning recommendation. The two main parallel runways for all purposes are flat, no change in elevation from one end to the other. There are periods during the summer when the ambient temperatures exceed 90℉ (32.2°C), but that shouldn't increase recommended runway length by 3,800 ft. So I am at a loss to explain the difference between the two recommendations.
Turbine D
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slightly off topic but still on runways please may I ask a stupid question?
Why has Gatwick the worlds busiest single runway airport got two runways?
Or have I finally gone doolally.
Why has Gatwick the worlds busiest single runway airport got two runways?
Or have I finally gone doolally.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12,800 at DAY?
Back when Emery was operating DC-8's out of DAY that might have been a issue. Anybody got some DC-8 figures?
Could Landrum-Brown have gotten the a/c types switched?
Back when Emery was operating DC-8's out of DAY that might have been a issue. Anybody got some DC-8 figures?
Could Landrum-Brown have gotten the a/c types switched?
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Runways in the Gulf region tends to be 15000 ft long .... 30 % of the total cost is paid by the us gov (NASA) so they could land their space ships in case of incident .........etc
The second reason due to the high temperatures, humidity (affects Density altitude) average temps during summer between june and august
45-55 degreess celsius and humdity of 88 %
The second reason due to the high temperatures, humidity (affects Density altitude) average temps during summer between june and august
45-55 degreess celsius and humdity of 88 %
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
baret1
Here is a link to Boeing's site for the DC-8, all models. Just roughly scanning over it, it looks like you need at least a 10,000 ft runway at MTOW for a CFM56-2 engine equipped DC-8 freighter, and somewhat longer for the JT3-D engine equipped DC-8 freighter.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/air...ps/dc8sec9.pdf
Here is a link to Boeing's site for the DC-8, all models. Just roughly scanning over it, it looks like you need at least a 10,000 ft runway at MTOW for a CFM56-2 engine equipped DC-8 freighter, and somewhat longer for the JT3-D engine equipped DC-8 freighter.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/air...ps/dc8sec9.pdf
Guest
Posts: n/a
Long runways with hard surfaces just encourage companies to design larger, faster and noisier aircraft. If we had grass strips of 400 yards we would be flying in much safer aircraft, burning much less polluting fuel and, hopefully, seeing stick and string biplanes again. No need to carry tgu*, just fly for pleasure.
*tgu: the great unwashed, aka pax or slf.
*tgu: the great unwashed, aka pax or slf.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
galaxy flyer
I don't know if they were doing "stimulus" projects five 6 years ago when this planning study was done for Dayton. At that time, the airport was hurting as US Air (largest airline presence) had basically abandoned their operations there. So Dayton was probably searching to fill the void with new airlines and air freight companies and hired Landrum-Brown to do this study. BTW, things have improved somewhat in Dayton, but CVG (Cincinnati) has gone on hard times with the departure of the Delta "hub" after the NWA merger.
Turbine D
I don't know if they were doing "stimulus" projects five 6 years ago when this planning study was done for Dayton. At that time, the airport was hurting as US Air (largest airline presence) had basically abandoned their operations there. So Dayton was probably searching to fill the void with new airlines and air freight companies and hired Landrum-Brown to do this study. BTW, things have improved somewhat in Dayton, but CVG (Cincinnati) has gone on hard times with the departure of the Delta "hub" after the NWA merger.
Turbine D
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Runways in the Gulf region tends to be 15000 ft long
There are a lot of 12-14000 feet runways.
Mutt
Prof. Airport Engineer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia (mostly)
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doha is the longest I've come across, and rumour amongst the builders was that one-upmanship was part of the design process.
The only other very very long one I know of in the area is the first of the runways at Jebel Ali ... Dubai World Central ... Al Maktoum International Airport (JXB) which is reportedly 4500m long.
There is a new airbase in the region for which construction tenders are being submitted at present - not sure of the name or length but will see what I can find.
The only other very very long one I know of in the area is the first of the runways at Jebel Ali ... Dubai World Central ... Al Maktoum International Airport (JXB) which is reportedly 4500m long.
There is a new airbase in the region for which construction tenders are being submitted at present - not sure of the name or length but will see what I can find.