Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Gas turbine rpms - sea level & cruise?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Gas turbine rpms - sea level & cruise?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2011, 12:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Gas turbine rpms - sea level & cruise?

Can anyone tell me for a given throttle setting how the rpm of the different stages in a turbofan vary between sea level (airport height will do) and cruise (say 35,000ft)?

It would seem reasonable that as the air is thinner at altitude that the fan could turn faster. Is this the case, and what about the other stage or stages in the engine?
Mechta is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 12:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mechta
It would seem reasonable that as the air is thinner at altitude that the fan could turn faster.
In general, that is not true. The rpm's of the different spools are 'tied together' by the thermodynamic relationships between the engine components. In other words, changing density affects all spools in the same way. The parameters changing with altitude are pressure, temperature and flight Mach number. How the spool speeds change with these parameters for given throttle setting is governed by the fuel control system (FCU, EEC or FADEC). Older control systems would maintain constant N2, newer systems might for example maintain constant N1 or constant N1/SQRT(T1).

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 18th Jan 2011 at 13:25.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 14:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mechta

HN39's response is correct. On most two spool engines, fan speed (N1) is controlled setting the power (thrust) to achieve desired speed at any altitude. Thrust is more accurately controlled because all the air passes through the fan with only a portion passing into the core. For various reasons, core speed is not an optimum manipulated variable to control fan speed. However, in three spool engines, the control for thrust seems to be N2, or the speed of the IP spool. Either way, since the spools are coupled, the speed of the fan remains within the desired power/thrust settings.
Turbine D is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 23:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
HazelNuts39 and Turbine D, Thanks for the replies. As I understand it, from what you are saying, the three stages stay at pretty much the same ratio of RPMs to each other, but I'm still not sure whether the RPM of N1 changes significantly with altitude, all other things being equal?

since posting the original question, I've since found this thread: http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/31248...rb211-rpm.html

This suggests that air density makes a difference to rpm, I'm curious by how much though. Does the fan (and the rest of the engine in proportion) not unload and increase rpm when at cruise altitude and speed to a significantly higher level compared to when the aircraft is static and near sea level?
Mechta is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 00:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spool speeds, etc.

Mechta;
Sorry, but you have to explain more specifically what question you have. Your OP question was about rpm variation "for a given throttle setting", and Turbine D and I replied to that question. If you are asking about rpm's for the maximum thrust available within a given thrust rating (e.g. Max CLB), that's another story. If you are talking about rpm's for the same thrust (e.g. EPR) at various temperatures at a given altitude, that's yet another story.
regards,
HN39

P.S. For a given thrust, altitude and Mach, rpm's of all spools vary in direct proportion to square root of ambient temperature (absolute, e.g. Kelvin). For given ambient temperature, rpm and Mach, thrust varies proportional to ambient pressure.

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 19th Jan 2011 at 08:22. Reason: P.S.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 02:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York & California
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When did fuel-control systems change from mechanical to partially-electronic, to full-electronic?
Jane-DoH is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 02:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Beijing
Age: 30
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is very interesting.
I'm often having a question for the factor that effect the compressor speed vs
altitude.

Is it possible that :
-the higher it go, the lower temp it is, and hence the more
EGT margin that the engine could archive with out burning the turbine.
[I'm heard some old engine like JT8D use the EGT as the factor to determine
the maximum thrust output]
-The higher we go, the more ram air pressure [for a typical flight], and hence
the compressor can produce more pressure to turn the turbine and hence
higher compressor speed.
- Or the Fuel Control Unit always work to keep the Compressor ratio constant?

Best Regards
Mr.Vortex is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 08:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jane-DoH;

Don't remember. I suggest you go to Wikipedia and search for "FADEC".

regards,
HN39
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2011, 11:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.Vortex
I'm heard some old engine like JT8D use the EGT as the factor to determine the maximum thrust output
All turbine engines have limits on spool speeds, gas temperature, and possibly compressor delivery pressure to protect engine integrity. Gas temperature depends on where it measured: EGT aft of the last turbine stage, and TGT is measured between turbine stages. EGT/TGT and rpm limits together serve to limit turbine entry temperature TET which is too hot to be measured directly. EDIT: The maximum thrust output is defined in the rating structure selected (somewhat arbitrarily) by the engine manufacturer, and must comply with the limits described above.

-The higher we go, the more ram air pressure [for a typical flight], and hence
the compressor can produce more pressure to turn the turbine
Ram air pressure ratio is a function of Mach, which may vary with altitude.

Or the Fuel Control Unit always work to keep the Compressor ratio constant?
As the name implies, the FCU controls the fuel flow in response to throttle setting and other parameters. AFAIK it doesn't control compressor (pressure) ratio directly.

regards,
HN39

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 19th Jan 2011 at 23:02.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 02:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-the higher it go, the lower temp it is, and hence the more
EGT margin that the engine could archive with out burning the turbine.
But the higher you go, the more thrust you need to maintain your airspeed thus making the engine hotter or at least not colder, methinks.

How wrong am I?

Best regards

Escape Path
Escape Path is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 08:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-the higher it go, the lower temp it is, and hence the more EGT margin that the engine could archive with out burning the turbine.
That is essentially correct. When operating at the limiting EGT, thrust decreases with increasing ambient temperature and vice versa, at any altitude.

regards,
HN39

P.S. By "EGT margin" I understand you mean the difference between the limiting EGT and that corresponding to the thrust rating. As said earlier, the rating selection is somewhat arbitrary. There is no particular reason for the 'margin' to increase with altitude, on the contrary perhaps.

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 20th Jan 2011 at 09:08. Reason: P.S.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 12:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am confused. Has someone really answered the OPs post?

I am curious to know the answer to his question, whether the RPM of the fan stays the same or increases for a given power setting as you go up in altitude. I will ask some questions to try to clarify this matter.

Let's say you use N1 (fan rpm) as reference. N1 will be shown as a percentage of the fan maximum RPM.

If I set a certain N1 setting for take off and do not move the thrust levers as I climb, what will the N1 display show (assuming no autothrottle etc.)?

If I am not mistaken it will decrease as we go up in altitude, meaning that the fan RPM will goes down, which means that we have to move the thrust levers forward to keep our maximum fan speed or N1 setting. However, when we reach that same N1 value (if throttle lever movement is sufficient to do so), since we are higher up, the engine will not be able to produce the same amount of thrust due to the thinner air.

So does that not mean that to maintain a certain power setting at higher altitude, RPM will have to go up? And also, if we are able to keep the same amount of thrust from the ground and up, RPM will have to increase?

I am no expert on this so please correct me if I am wrong.

Last edited by minimumunstick; 20th Jan 2011 at 13:17.
minimumunstick is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 13:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minimumunstick;

N1 will be shown as a percentage of the fan maximum RPM.
Not true. RPM's are displayed as a percentage of some arbitrary reference RPM which, in general, is not the maximum RPM. The maximum RPM varies with the rating, e.g.: TOGA, Max. Continuous, Max Climb, Max Cruise.

If I set a certain N1 setting for take off and do not move the thrust levers as I climb, what will the N1 display show (assuming no autothrottle etc.)?
That depends on the display. In most cases it will show actual N1 increasing as the engine spools up, settling at the N1 that corresponds with the thrust lever position (assuming that your engine is N1-controlled).

If I am not mistaken it will decrease as we go up in altitude, meaning that the fan RPM will goes down), which means that we have to move the thrust levers forward to keep our maximum fan speed or N1 setting.
That depends on what you have selected and how the engine is controlled (i.e. engine control system design). If you selected CLB and that rating is implemented in the EEC, then the RPM's will be whatever is necessary to provide the rated thrust schedule as you climb. If you selected a throttle setting below max, then some engines will maintain N1 and other engines will maintain N2 as you climb, until you hit some engine limit, and then (typically) the control stays on that limit. If you are climbing with constant N2, then N1 may increase or decrease, depending on the engine's thermodynamic characteristics. For a given engine, the relation between N1 and N2 depends on ambient temperature, not density. EDIT: It may also be affected by change of Mach number as you climb.

the engine will not be able to produce the same amount of thrust due to the thinner air.
See previous posts.

regards,
HN39

P.S. Density depends on pressure and temperature. It is usual to treat these parameters separately, since they have distinctly different effects on engine performance, as explained in earlier posts.

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 20th Jan 2011 at 14:54. Reason: P.S.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 14:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your post HazelNuts39

If I set a certain N1 setting for take off and do not move the thrust levers as I climb, what will the N1 display show (assuming no autothrottle etc.)?
That depends on the display. In most cases it will show actual N1 increasing as the engine spools up, settling at the N1 that you have set (assuming that your engine is N1-controlled).
I understand what you are saying, and I realize it is correct, however it is not really the answer I am looking for. I think you might have misunderstood my post just a little. The thing is that I am trying to understand the basics of how engine thrust and fan speed is affected by increased density altitude in a pure aerodynamic sense, disregarding any autothrottle or FADEC systems or specific technicalities.

I know some things can't be oversimplified, but yet..

Also I might have worded myself poorly. When I said "set a certain N1 setting" I didn't mean set the N1 as a permanent setting or in a computer or whatever, I meant move the throttle levers so that we have a specific N1 power setting at sea level on take off (again disregarding any FMS etc to control performance on T/O or climb or whatever)

Let me try again to make myself more clear:

We are on the runway and move the thrust levers 3/4 forward. We take off and climb and do not move the thrust levers from their position. Will the N1 that we had on the take-off roll at sea level increase or decrease?

As I said in my previous post, if I understand correctly the N1 percentage displayed will decrease, correct? So for a given throttle lever setting RPM will decrease with altitude, which means that we need to move the throttle levers forward to keep the same N1 setting as we climb.

If we again disregard any FMS or FADEC etc., this will mean that as we climb, engine performance will deteriorate due to higher density altitude / lower density? Does this not always apply? (you wrote see previous posts, but I couldn't really find an answer to this, probably because some of the replies given might have been a little too complicated for me to understand, so if you care to point me in the right direction on this I would appreciate it)


P.S. Density depends on pressure and temperature. It is usual to separate these parameters, since they have distinctly different effects on engine performance, as explained in earlier posts.
This to me is very interesting. When you say this, are you referring to the issue where some engines are EGT limited, and with a lower temperature can increase power output? In that case I understand what you are saying, but just to confirm, is it not still correct to say that as long as density altitude increases, if all other factors stay constant, engine performance will decrease?


Thanks
minimumunstick is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 15:27
  #15 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the pilot sets an RPM on any jet engine the function of the fuel control unit is to maintain that RPM regardless of any change in airspeed or altitude UNLESS changes are needed to keep the engine inside any of its operating limits.
John Farley is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 15:39
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the pilot sets an RPM on any jet engine the function of the fuel control unit is to maintain that RPM regardless of any change in airspeed or altitude UNLESS changes are needed to keep the engine inside any of its operating limits.
So even if I set the RPM (N1 setting) using the throttle levers only and not any FMC or any computer, any fuel control unit will still maintain the N1? Are you sure this applies even in small jets etc.?
minimumunstick is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 16:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Electronic controls - when?

So-called PMC's (Power Management Controls) - electronic controls performing fine trim on a basic hydromechanical system - came into the commercial engine market about 1982. The first I recall were on the CF6-80A on 767s and A310s.

FADEC - Full Authority Digital Electronics - were a few years later, mid or late 80s
barit1 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 16:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by minimumunstick
the basics of how engine thrust and fan speed is affected by increased density altitude in a pure aerodynamic sense, disregarding any autothrottle or FADEC systems or specific technicalities.
The first turbofan engine I became aquainted with was low bypass-ratio, two-spool, and had a hydromechanical fuel control unit featuring an overspeed governor for N2, an N1-limiter, a P3 limiter and variable-geometry feature in the form of a bleed valve that changed the relation between N1 and N2 in the low speed regime to prevent surge during rapid engine spool-up from idle. As long as you stayed clear of these features, a thrust lever position commanded a fixed N2. The point is that in the type of questions you are posing, you must try to distinguish what the control system does (no engine can do without it) from the "pure aerodynamics" of the turbomachinery of fixed (or variable) geometry. Regarding the latter, the best I can offer is:
Originally Posted by me
P.S. For a given thrust, altitude and Mach, rpm's of all spools vary in direct proportion to square root of ambient temperature (absolute, e.g. Kelvin). For given ambient temperature, rpm and Mach, thrust varies proportional to ambient pressure.
Which brings me to:
as we climb, engine performance will deteriorate due to higher density altitude / lower density?
That may be true, but it's not how I would describe it. What you describe is a matter of scale. Performance people reduce the number of variables by thinking in terms of 'non-dimensional' or 'referred' engine parameters, which are basically ratio's independent of 'scale'. For example: Exhaust pressure ratio EPR, or the ratio of thrust to ambient pressure, or the ratio of spool speed to the speed of molecules or the speed of sound (air temperature, sorry if I digress too far here). In those terms, there is no 'deterioration': at high altitude the engine processes a small mass of low-density air with the same efficiency as it does a larger mass at low altitude (at same OAT, Mach and EPR).

Perhaps I should stop here and await further questions, rather than repeating what I wrote earlier.

regards,
HN39

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 22nd Jan 2011 at 09:49.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 16:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure I understand or want to understand some of the replies in this thread, but I have absolute data for the A320 in front of me, and the reality is that for a given N1 RPM% value the thrust produced by the engine will change with altitude....

See here:

N1% = 78%, FL50, thrust = 29387N, CAS = 259kts
N1% = 78.2% FL370, thrust = 14130N, CAS = 260kts/M0.802

Therefore, it is my understanding that the FADEC (or whatever control system is in place) adjusts the fuel delivery to maintain the demanded RPM, with thrust changing as a function of altitude. This makes sense since at lower altitude the air is 'thicker' and hence you need more push to achieve a given forward speed, with the air density decreasing the higher you get, hence you need less push...

The point is that 78% N1 RPM is always the same irrespective of altitude (i.e. the blade passing frequency will be maintained), what varies is the fuel burn needed to maintain this RPM, as a consequence the thrust delivered by the engine.

- GY
GarageYears is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2011, 17:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Garageyears

The point is that 78% N1 RPM is always the same irrespective of altitude
Best you define percent of what??

and just what is or how is 100% defined.

Unless the definitions are defined it might turn out that even the 100% number varies with altitude.
lomapaseo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.