Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Non functioning APU

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Non functioning APU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2011, 19:46
  #21 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 727 if the APU is out, you're dead in the water, so to speak. You cannot start the engines or refuel the aircraft unless ground power, GPU, is available and you have an ground air source to start at least one engine.

In fact, unless modified, if you leave an engine running after landing, you still cannot refuel with out a GPU on the 727.

Oh, the APU on the 727 cannot be used in flight, ground operations only.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2011, 21:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... or did you mean an airport?
Yes, suitable overwater diversion airport.
This restriction was so that the airplane would have adequate electrical and pneumatic sources available in the event of a double engine failed situation...IE: same electrical/pneumatic redundancy as a four engine type, where an APU would not be approved for airbourne use (ala---B747).
The L1011 APU can be used (and is fully approved) , for both electrical and pneumatic sources, up to FL 310.

So, four engine redundancy, with a three engine airplane, with regard to electrics/pneumatics.

One should also remember...no L1011 has ever crashed due to an aircraft/engine design defect...quite unlike the B747 or the DC10.

Lockheed TriStar, simply a superior design...make no mistake.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 04:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boarded a CRJ700 in Aspen, CO a few days ago. It was no warmer than -10C outside and that hair dryer of a APU was struggling to keep it colder than 30C in the cabin.

Ended up leaving 10 people behind due to weight restrictions.... They shoulda kept those BAe146's.....
B-HKD is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 07:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the update 411A, but I don't see how

So, four engine redundancy, with a three engine airplane, with regard to electrics/pneumatics.
can be claimed. In a B747-400, dispatching with 1 u/s engine generator does not restrict one to 400 miles from an airport
TopBunk is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 09:15
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a B747-400...
Much later design.
In addition, the L1011 can also be dispatched with one engine IDG inop, with minor restriction, so long as the APU is functional.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 15:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lockheed TriStar, simply a superior design...make no mistake.
No question about it, which is why we see so many still in service, today...
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 15:50
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could the 747 Classic use the APU for electrics when airborne?

Did the Classic parallel the engine gennerators?

Did the L1011 parallel the engine generators?
TopBunk is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 18:28
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

some could.

yes.

what's an L1011?
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 18:34
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the L1011 parallel the engine generators?
Yes, together with the APU generator, if it was operating...all done completely automatically.
IE: no Flight Engineer input necessary.

One should remember that the L1011 was the first truly automatic jet airliner...others followed.
Refer to the thread on CATIIIC capability to see why it works so well.
Except, it appears for the RAF, who has continuing major difficulties.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 18:56
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alexandria VA USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As SLF, I flew from LHR to IAD on a BA 744 with an inop APU. It was not comfortable on the upper deck until they got the engines going. Took two huffers to blow start the thing. Had to divert from IAD to PHL and spent an hour at the gate at PHL, again with no APU before they got customs spun up and let us off. For being loyal BA passengers, we all received a complimentary hour's worth of sauna at each end of the flight.

I vote for the APU working even on the 744.

-Old Ag
Old Ag is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 19:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could the 747 Classic use the APU for electrics when airborne?

Did the Classic parallel the engine gennerators?
Some can, but with altitude limits. Engine generators sync, but will not sync with the APU generators.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 20:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine generators sync, but will not sync with the APU generators.
A poor design from the get go.
Having said this, the -400 model seems to be a vast improvement over the 'classic' design.
411A is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 02:51
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"On the 727 if the APU is out, you're dead in the water..."
Gee, life before APUs must have been unimaginable . . . with the world's early jet airliners all "dead in the water" . . .DHC106, SE210, B707, DC8, CV880, CV990 . . .
GlueBall is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 03:27
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 727 if the APU is out, you're dead in the water, so to speak. You cannot start the engines or refuel the aircraft unless ground power, GPU, is available and you have an ground air source to start at least one engine.

In fact, unless modified, if you leave an engine running after landing, you still cannot refuel with out a GPU on the 727.

Oh, the APU on the 727 cannot be used in flight, ground operations only.
That's the furthest thing from the truth I've heard in a while. Sentence by sentence: You can start the engines off Battery Power only, the aircraft can be refueled by manually opening the fueling valves in the wing (#1 and #3) and under the LE devices on the right wing (#2). Ground Air/Start Cart is needed though (GPU not required).

Unless Boeing went the several versions of the fueling valves and manifolds (which they didn't) the 727 can be refueled without even the battery being on. The only part you got right is that the 727 APU shouldn't be used in flight (it can't be started anyway, but can be left on accidentally after takeoff, and will flame out around 25000 feet), some operators had the T/O Warning horn attached to the APU in addition to the Flaps, Trim and Speedbrakes to prevent inadvertant takeoff with the APU on.

Bar none it's one of the best remote operations jets in the world.

Last edited by aviatorhi; 14th Jan 2011 at 06:33.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 15:15
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A poor design from the get go.
That must be why they're still hard at work earning a living today. Go figure.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 15:56
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally quite OK, however...MEL restrictions might apply.
For example, with the L1011, flights more than 400 NM offshore are not allowed.
In addition, there is normally an MEL time limit on APU unserviceability...ten calendar days in the case of our aircraft.
I noticed several responses to 411A's statement above. Some asked why the L-1011 need the APU for overwater flight: Will it does not.

The L-1011 MMEL has no such restriction.

411A's airline may have added it to their MEL, which is allowed. The airlines MEL can always be more restrictive (never less restrictive) that the MMEL.

glhcarl is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 09:28
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that I got to thinking about it, in a pinch you could start a 727 without even the battery being on, that's right, no power at all. All you need is air (however this is a long drawn out procedure I've had explained to me by PFEs who flew in war zones). Realistically though, you could start without aircraft electrics but you would need ground electrics.

Last edited by aviatorhi; 17th Jan 2011 at 05:26.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 18:54
  #38 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the furthest thing from the truth I've heard in a while. Sentence by sentence: You can start the engines off Battery Power only,
I guess we attended different school then. I attended Braniff Ailines' FE and type school.

I do agree with this.

Bar none it's one of the best remote operations jets in the world.
However, dead APU, no air cart, no go. You land, start the APU, shut the engines down, APU fails, will not restart, no air.

How are you going to start the engines?

One more point we differ.

but can be left on accidentally after takeoff, and will flame out around 25000 feet)
This happened to me twice, on both occasions the APU did not flame out at FL 250. The APU fire warning coming on and the the fire bell ringing was the first indication that the APU was still running.

Also on both occasions, there was a pilot/FE, not a professional FE riding side saddle.

By the way, I do have over 7,000 hours flying the 727.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 19:51
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did say the only thing you need is air, so no APU=not dead in the water.

I've left it on once and noticed it at 1000 MSL and switched it off... I've heard leaving the APU on results in everything from it just flaming out to blowing up the tires to fire bells to compressor stalls (when switching onto #2 bleed in flight) etc. etc. I've never let it get that far and the most common one I hear is a flamout.

I'm not sure how much they taught you at EA, but I've had to climb under the LE flap more than once to override a premature VTO shutoff.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 20:41
  #40 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've left it on once and noticed it at 1000 MSL and switched it off... I've heard leaving the APU on results in everything from it just flaming out to blowing up the tires to fire bells to compressor stalls (when switching onto #2 bleed in flight) etc. etc. I've never let it get that far and the most common one I hear is a flamout.
Actually in the FE school they taught that the first indication of the APU still being on after takeoff was the Wheel Well fire alarm would come on. So the first time this happened we all were concerned that even though the fire bell was ringing, none of the fire warning lights on the instrument panel were illuminated. Unfortunately my eager co-pilot silenced the bell just about as fast as the bell rang.

I remarked to the co-pilot that I kind of wished he had not done that, silence the bell, as we had an overheat/fire condition indicated somewhere. So trouble shooting was now rather limited. So I told him to recheck the lights, there was a chance that two bulbs had gone out at the same time, but not very likely. Just about then I started to think on just what could set off an fire alarm, but not light up anything on the instrument panel. Then it hit me, the APU.

So I kind of stood up in my seat, craned my head around so I could see the APU panel and sure enough, the APU fire light was on. So I told the FE to shut down the APU, so he grabed the start/stop switch and moved it to off. Of course the switch is disabled while airborne, so I had to tell him to pull the APU fire handle. He did and the light went out immediately.

Then he started arguing with me, he claimed that he did shut down the APU before takeoff and that the APU must have self-generated a start.

Besides being a terrible FE, he wasn't much of a pilot either as it turned out.

Give me a professional Flight Engineer any day.
con-pilot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.