Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Oxygen Endurance

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Oxygen Endurance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2011 | 08:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Oxygen Endurance

Hi, I have a question about the oxygen system in our Boeing 747-400.
We questioned our system, because during the required short test we noticed that the pressure dropped 10 psi. This also happened during the next consecutive tests. Therefore we decided to don the masks (all still on the ground) and use it for 2 minutes at 100% (3 pilots) In these 2 minutes we lost 110 psi from the total of the 1500psi we normally carry on board (minimum required 700psi)
So, this means that when you fly low, and when using 100% oxygen (smoke etc.) you only have less than 30 minutes oxygen......
I and my colleagues thought that we would have more endurance.
Our manuals are all blank about this subjects....
What are your views and opinions about this????
Herbie65 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 09:42
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
There is a problem in the system in that airplane.

That is EXACTLY why you do the initial short test. You should see NO pressure drop.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 10:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: sandhurst
Actually the nominal pressure in the oxygen system is 1800 psi.The low limit for despatch from base after a daily check is 1700 psi. It looks like you have a leak.
t6 sparky is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 10:05
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: ---
The lowest our table -the company put one in our QRH- goes is 8000ft; but there 1500psi should give you 5:50 manhours of 100% oxygen on the 744F. I suppose the flightdeck system is similar to the pax -400.
ray cosmic is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 12:00
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: .
Cool

Depends on the flt and routing, LH, ULH over mountains or over the Atlantic, you can dispatch with 680 psi.
spannersatcx is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 12:56
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Europe
That is EXACTLY why you do the initial short test. You should see NO pressure drop.
According our FCOM a drop up to 100psi is acceptable....

Actually the nominal pressure in the oxygen system is 1800 psi.The low limit for despatch from base after a daily check is 1700 psi. It looks like you have a leak.
The lower limit for dispatch differs in our company per stretch. For example over the Himalaya we need to have 1650 psi, and from another station back to homebase 700psi is acceptable. On what do you base there is a leak? In case of a leak, the pressure should always drop, also when not using any masks...

The lowest our table -the company put one in our QRH- goes is 8000ft; but there 1500psi should give you 5:50 manhours of 100% oxygen on the 744F. I suppose the flightdeck system is similar to the pax -400.
No, the freighter has more bottles for cockpit and supernumary crew. The Pax version only has 1 cockpit bottle...
However i like to see your tables...

Depends on the flt and routing, LH, ULH over mountains or over the Atlantic, you can dispatch with 680 psi.
Like we do....
Herbie65 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 13:34
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 847
From: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
In the 737 the master oxygen valve is in the forward hold, so that the engineers can shut the O2 off when playing with the tank. When the valve is turned off, pressure remains in the lines leading to the cockpit - so the guage remains at bottle pressure, and there is no cockpit indication of the lack of O2 availability in this configuration, except an overly rapid drop in pressure during the O2 test.
Checkboard is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 15:12
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Europe
reaction to the answers:
There is a problem in the system in that airplane.
That is EXACTLY why you do the initial short test. You should see NO pressure drop.


A drop of 100psi during the test is acceptable according our FCOM, so there shouldn't be the problem.

The lowest our table -the company put one in our QRH- goes is 8000ft; but there 1500psi should give you 5:50 manhours of 100% oxygen on the 744F. I suppose the flightdeck system is similar to the pax -400.

the system on the Freighter is different than the Pax version. the freighter has more bottles for fire surpression. However i like to see these tables...


I am still shocked to see that we only have 30 minutes of oxygen in the 744-400
Herbie65 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 18:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: earth
I am still shocked to see that we only have 30 minutes of oxygen in the 744-400
Clearly understand the advantage of having hrs of oxygen in a -f to starve out a fire. 30 minutes should be plenty of time in a pax bird to decend (terrain providing) to a breathable altitude, too much more time and you would start killing off your payload.
grounded27 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 20:00
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
According our FCOM a drop up to 100psi is acceptable...
A SINGLE 50-100 psi drop is acceptable in the short test, just because the gauge measurement might be on the edge of the 1500-1450 or 1500-1400 psi threshold. However, repeated 100 psi drops on multiple tests is NOT acceptable, at least in the freighter version.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2011 | 21:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Don't know about FAA regs but EU Ops requires 120 mins of oxygen for flight-deck crew.
Pub User is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2011 | 16:10
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Don't know about FAA regs but EU Ops requires 120 mins of oxygen for flight-deck crew.
Can you tell me where i can find this rule?
it is new to me!!!!
(we are talking about a pax version of the 747-400)

Last edited by Herbie65; 11th January 2011 at 16:28.
Herbie65 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2011 | 16:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 1
From: Playing Golf!
It is in EU OPS 1.770 Appendix 1.

PT6A
PT6A is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2011 | 20:38
  #14 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: USA
Oxygen Endurance

In the US, FAR 121.333 requires enough oxygen for each flight crewmember to have 2 hours' worth: 10 minutes' worth during a constant descent from the max certificated altitude for that aircraft to 10,000 feet, and then 110 minutes' worth at 10,000. It doesn't address some of the possible variations of flow rate (e.g., 100% vs. normal, normal vs. emergency), nor does it address different requirements for cargo carriers who utilize Class E compartments.

As far as flow rates, 100% at one atmosphere (i.e., sea level) is very, very high, but decreases as cabin altitude goes up. Emergency flow is fixed regardless of altitude (on most masks) and normal flow (again, on a "typical" mask) results in almost no oxygen being used at lower cabin altitudes, but will increase oxygen in the mix until you're breathing 100% oxygen -- even in Normal -- at higher altitudes, typically between 18,000' and 25,000'.

Another way of putting it....If you need 100% oxygen and you're not sure your supply will last as long as you need it, consider climbing the cabin altitude. Of course, if others are on the aircraft, this won't always be practical....
MD11guy is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2011 | 14:58
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 5
From: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Another way of putting it....If you need 100% oxygen and you're not sure your supply will last as long as you need it, consider climbing the cabin altitude.
But then again, one of the top reasons for one to need oxygen in the first place is loss of cabin pressure.
Escape Path is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2011 | 16:18
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Europe
It is not the TOP reason. It is one of the reasons.
It is as important as oxygen in case of smoke/fumes....
Herbie65 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2011 | 16:22
  #17 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 5
From: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
It is as important as oxygen in case of smoke/fumes....
I agree, that's why I said one of the top reasons. The other one being the one you said.
Escape Path is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.