Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Manual Input Of RNP and UNABLE RNP Message

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Manual Input Of RNP and UNABLE RNP Message

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2010, 23:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manual Input Of RNP and UNABLE RNP Message

I've noticed whilst sitting at the gate, than I was unable to generate an ">UNABLE RNP" EICAS message (747-400) by manually entering an RNP smaller than the displayed ANP. I waited about a minute for the message to appear to see if there was a time delay for the message, but I imagine that you would want to see a message relating to this ASAP.

Would there be an air/ground inhibit on this message or something more specific? e.g. LNAV and/or VNAV arm/engage

Thanks.
Cheers
NSEU

Last edited by NSEU; 12th Dec 2010 at 01:46.
NSEU is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2010, 01:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AFAIK the logic is inhibited on the ground after a certain software version - noticed that the ANP was exceeding 10 NM while the IRS were aligning the other day and the aircraft didnt say a thing. On another ship (with older software) it immediately complained (UNABLE RNP) when the IRSs were turned on for alignment...
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2010, 14:11
  #3 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stbyrud:
AFAIK the logic is inhibited on the ground after a certain software version - noticed that the ANP was exceeding 10 NM while the IRS were aligning the other day and the aircraft didnt say a thing. On another ship (with older software) it immediately complained (UNABLE RNP) when the IRSs were turned on for alignment...
Perhaps the newer software was RNP AR compliant, which has far more demanding performance requirements than "plain vanilla" RNP.
aterpster is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2010, 15:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That might well be the case - the aircraft in question (with the newer software) also continously displays ANP and RNP in the ND and has the ANP deviation bars on the PFD...
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 08:41
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, gentlemen. Lots of food for thought.

Actually, I wasn't aware of the new "AR" software.

Cheers
NSEU
NSEU is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 13:53
  #6 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NSEU:
Actually, I wasn't aware of the new "AR" software.
That is speculation on my part. A load with RNP AR capabilities replacing a load without those capabilities would tend to show sublte changes of the nature described.

Improved software without RNP AR capability would likely have improvements of some type.
aterpster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.