Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

SLOP (Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure)

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

SLOP (Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2010, 13:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFALPA October 2010

"While headline figures revealed by the data gives some encouragement; by the end of 2009 some 40% of flights were using an offset, there is still a concern that the distribution remains unbalanced with 60% of flights on centreline, 30% at 1nm offset and 10% 2nm offset (at 30W) this compares with the optimum 33/33.5/33.5 distribution that will deliver the greatest risk reduction."

IFALPA October 2010 - Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure (SLOP)
CONF iture is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2010, 16:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: in the toilet
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very wise advice here-basic rule of the air: KEEP RIGHT! Offsetting to left of centreline is just stupid, unless due to WX.
gchangflyer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2010, 22:52
  #23 (permalink)  
G-V
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: HK
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLOP...never found it necessary, and neither have the Captains that work for us, either.
Therefore, not done in our outfit....and, not likely to start anytime soon.
I believe that there are some small (you might call them unnecessary) things in aviation which are useful and increase safety.

The chances to die in the head on crash on an airway are very low, but I guess the relatives of 155 dead people from that GOL flight (including the crew, which decided that SLOP is unnecessary) will not appreciate it.

Sarcasm on.

Looking out the window...never found it necessary, and neither have the Captains that work for us, either.
Therefore, not done in our outfit....and, not likely to start anytime soon.

Sarcasm off.

Last edited by G-V; 10th Nov 2010 at 23:06.
G-V is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2010, 10:39
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLOP...never found it necessary, and neither have the Captains that work for us, either.
Therefore, not done in our outfit....and, not likely to start anytime soon.

I'm shocked.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2010, 11:06
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Unionville, PA, USA
Age: 76
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ant1
What about FAR 91.181?

Sec. 91.181

Course to be flown.

Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within controlled airspace under IFR except as follows:
(a) On a Federal airway, along the centerline of that airway.
(b) On any other route, along the direct course between the navigational aids or fixes defining that route. However, this section does not prohibit maneuvering the aircraft to pass well clear of other air traffic or the maneuvering of the aircraft in VFR conditions to clear the intended flight
path both before and during climb or descent.
That regulation was written long before GPS. If either aircraft in the Brazil midair had used 1 mile right both would have passed in the night, neither knowing how close they came. Any pilot not using an off set in certain areas of the world are either negligent or ignorant or both.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2010, 11:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 73
Posts: 457
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
I have always employed S.L.O.P. ever since it came into being. It came in very handy one night when we had to go back to CYYT due to a medical emergancy as it took less time to get to the 15nm offset before turning back. Not only that being two miles over gives you a nice look at who is out there as well.
a330pilotcanada is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2010, 08:52
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FoxHunter, what I was trying to convey is that the issue should be promptly addressed by the regulators. Being found to have entered a home made offset after an incident may also pose issues.
ant1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.