Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B-737 Ng: Are Thrust Levers Fly By Wire?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B-737 Ng: Are Thrust Levers Fly By Wire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2010, 15:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Wow that is a real eye opener. Anyone know if there is any benefit other than cost saving. Particularly worrying would be Gol flying long distances over Brazil out of thirty minutes range of an airfield or All Nippon that had a couple of aircraft doing long range all business class services. That is the sort of information that would help me decide who not to fly with. Unlikely as the loss of all generators might be, the recent russian incident shows it is possible.
lederhosen is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2010, 16:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An eyeopener indeed. To explain why is was a bit surprised that there is actually a single battery option (although knowing nearly everything on a 737 is optional it shouldn't really be surprising), our generic transition training CBT provided by boeing when transitioning from classics to NGs told us "all Boeing 737 NGs are equipped with dual batteries" which seems to be some misinformation. Not really surprising as the boeing CBTs are not all that good anyway, but still...
Denti is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2010, 16:30
  #23 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since all NG's are delivered 'ETOPS Capable' I guess the 'standard' would be 2 and you would probably have to argue to get 1?
BOAC is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2010, 17:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near EDDF
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EL AL too: (there is no "AUX BAT" position at the DC Selector)
Photos: Boeing 737-758 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 08:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 398
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since all NG's are delivered 'ETOPS Capable' I guess the 'standard' would be 2 and you would probably have to argue to get 1?
Not sure what the battery(ies) would have to do with ETOPS, as the ETOPS portion of the flight is predicated on having the APU running to supply electrical power, if required.
Capt Chambo is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 08:18
  #26 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed, but I know which I would prefer mid-oggin!
BOAC is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 10:52
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regard to 30 minutes battery duration with the single battery NG...

In the case of a complete AC power failure in an NG (unlikely), I have always considered the 30 minutes of battery duration to be employed only during the approach part of the recovery....you know, when you really need all those instrument thingies and talky things to get you to the right end of the runway going in the right direction.

Why would you drain the battery(s) in level cruise flight, when there are quite enough indications of heading, altitude and speed, then have not enough left when you really need it, to shoot a normal(ish) approach (VHF1, NAV1, ADF1) if the need arose.

As an aside...well almost...in a dual battery NG,
1/ the secondary battery is not normally used for anything at all, the ONLY time the two batteries are connected is when standby power is activated, and
2/ if you ever arrive at the airplane to start the APU, and find the primary battery isn't up to it, selecting standby power on to connect the two batteries won't help, since selecting the APU to start is the only time, with standby power selected, that the two batteries are disconnected from each other.

Cheers,
ew73
EW73 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 14:25
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Everyone is entitled to their point of view. I think I am with BOAC on this one, as are obviously the majority of NG operators judging by the list. Having one battery can hardly improve safety as to whether it seriously reduces it is the question. Anyone have any examples where having two batteries has helped?
lederhosen is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 20:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my company we have most of the NG with the dual battery config, but some (2 -800) has the single battery.

EK73 thanks for the /2 information: I didn't know about that
Topper80 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 23:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Obviously plenty of operators have single battery installations.
Having worked on 737's for nearly 30 years I have never seen personally a single aircraft that has lost all 3 gennys.
We run etops all the time aand fly in excess of 4 hours on a few legs.All single battery.Sure 2 or more of everything is great but given the record of the 737 classic and NG the lack of necessity speaks for itself imho.
ampclamp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.