ATR72/Q400 IDLE Fuel Flow

[CabinMaster]

Originally Posted by Tu.114

Also the propeller is fundamentally different both in design and its auxiliary systems.

Thanks for the input. Propeller is the biggest issue.
Simulating an installed turbo-prop is much more difficult than a turbo-fan.

By the way, as your username is Tu-114: do you have any information about the Tu-114 above the stuff I can find at Wikipedia? I am specifically looking for cruise altitude and Mach number, maybe also propeller diameter.

[Tu.114]

A little diversion from the thread - You might find useful information on that on following pages: Creation of the TV-2 (NK-12) turboprop engine motor-s.ru/motor_new/index.php?siteid=22 (in Russian) ????????????? ????????? ??-12?? (in Russian) Tu-114 Cleat

[sili-1]

The ATR72-500 burns 100kg/hr per engine at idle on the ground, approx 70 kg/hr per engine at idle at FL250. Hope this helps!