Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Critical Mach versus Altitude...

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Critical Mach versus Altitude...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th October 2010 | 11:51
  #21 (permalink)  
PBL
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 965
Likes: 110
From: Bielefeld, Germany
I am having a little difficulty understanding what you are proposing. Here is why.

Originally Posted by HN39
c_L=1.3826*10^-4*W/(delta*M^2*S)
where W=weight (mass) in kg, delta=ratio of ambient to SLS pressure, M=Mach, S= (reference) wing area in m^2
Looking at the units, this is ((number) x Force) / (number x number x Area), i.e force per unit area. Let M be mass units, L be length units, T be time units. Force is then M x L / T^2; Area is L^2, so this comes down to M x L / T^2 x L^2, which is M / T^2 x L.

Whereas in the usual definition of c_L, which you quote as
Originally Posted by HN39
c_L ..... is commonly defined as LIFT/(q*S)
c_L has no units: (M x L / T^2) / ( (M / L^3) x (L/T)^2 x L^2 ) all cancels out.

PBL
PBL is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2010 | 12:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
From: France - mostly
PBL;

Yes, you're quite right. c_L is dimensionless. The formula interprets W as mass.

regards,
HN39

PM
The constant just after the equal sign is equal to 2*g/(rho*c^2), where:
g = acceleration of gravity at SL = 9.80665 m/s^2
rho = air density at SL std temp = 1.225 kg/m^3
c = speed of sound at SL std temp = 340.3 m/s

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 11th October 2010 at 13:51. Reason: Numerical values in PM
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2010 | 12:35
  #23 (permalink)  
PBL
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 965
Likes: 110
From: Bielefeld, Germany
Originally Posted by HN39
The formula interprets W as mass, all units are accounted for in the number that precedes it, which has the dimension (in your notation) of L^2/M.
Sorry, numbers have no dimensions to me.

Terminology difference. Yes, it is now clear to me that your numbers are constants. However, I still have difficulty with equating weight with mass. Weight is to me still a force (opposed in the case of level flight to lift, and one which I feel clearly every time I pick up my suitcase), so still M x L / T^2.

PBL

Last edited by PBL; 11th October 2010 at 14:50. Reason: Clarification by HN39
PBL is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2010 | 13:24
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
From: France - mostly
PBL: Sorry I missed your post while editing mine. I trust the re-edit clears things up.
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2010 | 20:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 8
From: UK
An alternative (and perhaps simpler?) way into this one is to note that

q = 1/2*gamma*M^2*P

where P is staitc pressure, Hence:

c_L = weight/(1/2*gamma*M^2*P*S)

If you substitute P= delta*101325 Pa, weight = mass*9.80665 m/s^2 and gamma=1.4 you get HN39's formula.

In any event c_L (and hence alpha) increase as you cimb at constant Mach. Would Mcrit for a wing increase with alpha? I don't know but I would think it might.

Last edited by Rivet gun; 12th October 2010 at 08:23.
Rivet gun is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2010 | 06:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
From: France - mostly
AoA and altitude

This graph: Variation of AoA with altitude shows angle of attack at constant weight and Mach (0.65) for a typical new technology widebody airplane.

regards,
HN39
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th November 2010 | 09:07
  #27 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
The Prandtl relation and the more commonly used Karman Tsien have two main applications...
1. determine the lift slope curve dCl/dalpha
2. to find the highest incompressible Lift coefficient where the free stream
MN =1.00,...or Mcrit---usually in a graphical tabulation of some kind


Last edited by Pugilistic Animus; 8th November 2010 at 12:45. Reason: replace MN with Cl---bold
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.