Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Nav Error ????

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Nav Error ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2010, 13:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida winter Utah summer
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nav Error ????

Question :
Flying back the other day from HKG to EWR via polar routing the aircraft (a B777-200) flew directly over the top of the Resolute Bay (CYRB) airport (a rare day when you can actually see it visually) yet the Nav Display depicted the airport (not the navaid) as being about 12 nm further in front of us - why would that be ?????

The ND indicated that GPS was updating position at that time and the nav data base indicated that it was current. This concerns me as what if God forbid we had needed to find the place for an emergency landing.
Airspeedintervention is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2010, 17:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: h&h
Posts: 94
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well... as long as you are able to visually see the airfield, that would mean that you're actually not flying 'directly over the top', wouldn't it?
reivilo is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2010, 19:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida winter Utah summer
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well when I see it going by my window and the ND shows it to still be 12 nm in front of me I think that's a bit of a problem.
Airspeedintervention is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2010, 19:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,142
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
It may seem obvious, but have you cross-checked the FMS lat and long for CYRB against those published in the Canadian AIP? There may be an error!
eckhard is online now  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 03:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
see it visually
Is there any other way to see something?
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 10:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
poser indeed

6nm up and a ground distance of 12nm? That's a cone with a half-angle of 63 degrees at the apex. Or to put it another way 12nm out in 4800nm travelled is 0.25%.

I thought Resolute Bay was in Nunavut and only a dirt strip.

I seem to recall that Boeing positions change calculation mode at about 84deg North depending on model.

Continental do this run, that you?
mathy is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 12:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In some Marriott
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CYRB = N74° 43' 01.00" W094° 58' 10.00" with a 6500'x200' gravel strip according to World Aero Data.
Gulfcapt is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 13:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah

I thought so. But it may "qualify" to appear on the nav display if the sole restriction is length. I'd guess you'd have to be pretty Resolute to go there. Like a hill I climbed in Sitka called Bear Mountain. It had bears. Boeing did do a polar route article in their aero puff mag and CYRB was definitely not on the list of places for a divert! I think Shemya, Cold Bay and King Salmon were "approved" but I'd like to sit down and talk with the approver.

PS I wondered if there was a distant navaid. At N74 44.8 W094 59.7 there was an NDB, formerly a tall mast structure. At N74 43.6 W094 55.3 there is a VOR c/s YBR but neither of these is "distant" from the airstrip. Both show up on google maps with positional errors easily accounted for by the single decimal accuracy in minutes. The NDB may be there still but I have a notion it blew over or some such mishap.

Last edited by mathy; 13th Aug 2010 at 14:06.
mathy is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2011, 18:32
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida winter Utah summer
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes me wonder ?

Hmmmmmmm........

Jet was 5 miles from Canadian airport when it crashed, killing 12 - CNN.com
Airspeedintervention is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2011, 20:11
  #10 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CNN is wrong. That was the first report, later corrected.

Read AvHerald instead of CNN.
aterpster is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2011, 20:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by mathy
6nm up and a ground distance of 12nm? That's a cone with a half-angle of 63 degrees at the apex. Or to put it another way 12nm out in 4800nm travelled is 0.25%
I'm with mathy here. I think that Airspeedintervention is simply having trouble judging distance along the ground, when compared to teh map data in the aircraft.

As a "rule of thumb", as something disappears from view under the nose, it is one mile away for every thousand feet of altitude - so cruising at F380, something on the ground disappearing under the nose is 38 miles away. 12 miles is nothing at high altitudes.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2011, 21:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,764
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
Aviation Herald coverage here:
Crash: First Air B732 near Resolute Bay on Aug 20th 2011, impacted terrain
Airspeedintervention, your concern about having experienced a possible nav error and expressing that concern here then posting again having learned of the Resolute Bay tragedy, is commendable. The explanation given by other posters of the seeming discrepancy is probably correct, but so was your willingness to put your concern to your peers. One day that willingness could save lives, never lose it!
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2011, 21:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a side note: When I'm driving 121mph and I'm exactly underneath a bridge, my GPS map still shows the bridge in front of me. There is a GPS graphics lag at high ground speeds. . . even on our glass cockpit screens!
GlueBall is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.