Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Aerial Spraying From B737

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Aerial Spraying From B737

Old 15th Jul 2010, 14:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: tetbury
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerial Spraying From B737

Have any of you techies been involved in the flying or conversion of B737 (probably the QC model) in an airborne spraying fit? I gather there is a STC out there somewhere and would very much like to get my hands on the details?
ExCreamie is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 15:37
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,217
Received 135 Likes on 62 Posts
There was a program started in Canada to fit a 737-200 with a belly mounted retardent tank for aerial forest fire suppression but I would be very surprised if a spray rig would work. Spray systems consist of a series of nozzles below and behind the wing. The flow rate is fairly low and a lot of work is put into palcing the nozzles so that they exhuast into smooth air. The underwing mounted engines of a 737 would put so much heat and turbulance into the pattern I would guess you could only put nozzles at mid span and outboard which would put a big gap into the middle of the pattern. Also I cannot think how you would mount the nozzles and still allow full flap operation.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 16:30
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: tetbury
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I was thinking of mounting the spray arms well aft as per C130/L100 style with the dispersant chemicals carried internally - so you have to penetrate the pressurised hull as part of the STC. Problem is that the Hercy bird is naturally the weapon of choice but finding airframes with the necessary life expectancy is testing to say the least. A good 737 costs 10% of a good C130. Not that I much fancy the idea of 140kts at 100' amongst the seagulls with 2 jet engines!
ExCreamie is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 21:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,810
Received 134 Likes on 66 Posts
Plenty of information here.
Checkboard is online now  
Old 15th Jul 2010, 22:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,680
Received 71 Likes on 45 Posts
ExC, PM for you..
sycamore is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 10:25
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marlow
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spray adaptations

I don't think the actual spray modification would be difficult although as a correspendent says it would require cutting into the pressure hull - need to get some good clas though! The interesting bit is the in-aircraft dispersant aspects (tankage needs to be vented externally thus pressure vessel, fluid has SG approx 1 so high denstity: both Cof G locations and floor strength need to be considered.
JimCoates is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 11:05
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Hot Section / Gas Turbines
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares how hard it is to acheive what a job im in if you need a driver!!!!
burnercan is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 11:14
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What am I missing here? I keep seeing mention of 'pressure vessel'. As pressurisation only applies to ferry/positioning flights why is it an issue? There must be dozens of temporary ways to take pipework from inside to outside.
forget is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 17:13
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Thirty West
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds fun - if you need a jockey gimme a call
Just have to raise my life insurance before...
cirr737 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2010, 11:35
  #10 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: temporarily unsure ...
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Assuming this is not a windup, and assuming it is about spraying Gulf-sized areas rather than poppy fields, I fear that you are way off track in envisaging Pawnee-style kit - 'spray arms' - being strapped to a 737. Furthermore, the prospect of flying a 737 at crop-spraying height over an oil-smoothed surface is not one which would appeal to me - or to cirr737's insurers! - it is inappropriate, and unnecessary.

The essential challenge (apart from keeping the CofG about right) is in securing a spray discharge with the right droplet size range. (Bear in mind that droplet formation is governed by the free surface energy characteristic of the liquid, and that that of a dispersant may differ from those of agri-fluids).

Overcome that, and Stokes' Law is your friend. You may achieve good and wide surface distribution from a sensible and safe height without spray arms, and indeed without any new penetrations of the pressure hull. ( If you are serious and need more 'gen feel free to PM me ).
dogle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.