Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Unreliable FMC fuel calculation with gear extended

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Unreliable FMC fuel calculation with gear extended

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jun 2010, 13:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle East
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unreliable FMC fuel calculation with gear extended

Has anyone more info or an "easy technical explanation" about it?
Thanks.
fly744 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 13:36
  #2 (permalink)  

ECON cruise, LR cruise...
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MIRSI hold - give or take...
Age: 52
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes

The FMC calculates fuel based on the parameters entered + the DB installed.

Since there is no "gear down" option in most DBs, it follows that the predicted fuel will be wrong when dispatching with the gear down. A quick Google of "Condor+Vienna" will lead you to a case in point

Some FMS OEMs have included a "measured" perfromance option that will use the previously achived SAR as the base for calculations, but this will generlly need to be pilot selected, since "predicted" performance (i.e. the DB values) is default on most FMS'.

Honestly...
Empty Cruise is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 13:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was Hapag Lloyd at Vienna.
hetfield is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 13:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus says flight management system not to blame in Hapag crash
hetfield is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 18:22
  #5 (permalink)  

ECON cruise, LR cruise...
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MIRSI hold - give or take...
Age: 52
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hetfield,

Indeed it was - I stand corrected Classic bit of "knowing your aircraft", tho... or one should have thought that when the FMS came up with the same arrival fuel after the gear wouldn't come up as it had on the ground, a penny or two should have dropped.

But then again - there but for the grace of God...
Empty Cruise is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 19:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,800
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
As a rough guide, an airliner will burn about twice as much fuel per mile gear down compared to gear up.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2010, 22:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ***
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The CRJ I fly with a Collins FMS has a prompt to switch from "predicted" to "messured" mode wich will change the fuel calculation to where it calculates with the actual fuel flow. It won't take into account descent or climb, just use the present fuel flow to predict the arrival fuel.
Not a good tool for normal ops, but having something wrong with your configuration, it would serve as a good guess on where you might be able to go.

Nic
Admiral346 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 05:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not again....

Look, I'm a Boeing man so know little about Airbus A310's, or any other ab,

but I CAN tell you this...after reading that report,

I can tell you it does not carry a Flight Engineer...

will they ever learn.....

ew73
EW73 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 06:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having spoken to a couple of people who have done ferry flights with gear down, their opinion was that even the charts with gear extended in the performance manuals were incredibly inaccurate....ie they used significantly more fuel than they had expected.

Now thats only from a couple of people across 2 types of boeings, so it isnt a big sample, but it does make you wonder.
blueloo is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 10:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concerning the A310 Vienna accident, as far as I remember the FMC was really tricky there. The calculation to the next waypoint was correct, using actual FF. But afterwards the FMC assumes a retracted gear again. So from waypoint to waypoint the situation changed drastically.
hetfield is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 10:28
  #11 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
really tricky
???Tricky!! Nothing tricky about "I wonder if I'm going to use more fuel with the gear down?" and "Hey Bloggs, did you see how the predicted fuel for the next waypoint suddenly changed? WTF caused that?" coupled with "I wonder if we have enough?"

I just know there's a word for that - cannot recall it..............................
BOAC is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 10:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOAC

All I wanted to point out is the technical background of the FMC.

(Assuming a clean ship after next waypoint).

To let these guys look like idiots is your business not mine.
hetfield is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 16:46
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think 'fly744' got the answer to the 'technical' stuff in post#2?

It does not need my help to achieve what you describe, Hetfield - and it was not "these guys" it was "that guy". Lucky indeed only 28 were injured and all were not killed. My views on Computers in the cockpit and the safety of aviation are on record. He:

Ignored F/O's warnings
Appeared to 'trust' illogical fuel predictions
Ignored 'short of fuel' warning 1 hr before crashing
Was reported to be most senior H-L Captain - until

fly744 - you say you are a 744 Captain. I would recommend (I guess you would know anyway?)
a) listen to the F/O's views
b) when fuels start to depart from the expected, consider abandoning any gizmos like the FMC and revert to a straightforward 'how-goze-it' graph
c) if the gizmo then tells you you will run out of fuel, take note.

BTW - did we ever get a link to an English translation of the Austrian report and what happened in the court case against the Captain?
BOAC is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2010, 18:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOAC

Again, this thread has a technical issue.

Nevertheless I fully agree with you about badly CRM in that particular accident.

Regards
hetfield is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2010, 03:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Too far from the equator
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ferried a gear-down 737 from Borneo to KL a few years back . Apart from the incredible noise and unhelpful ATC ( Why you fly so slow ? gear down ? you wanna declare mayday ? ((Mentioned on FP under Rmks , waste of time )) what struck me was how very accurate the QRH Planning data was .
kotakota is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2010, 08:56
  #16 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find that Block18 (remarks) do not normally make their way onto controllers' flight strips, and of course the absence of the customary 'kotakota' R/T background 'clackers' would have caused confusion to them.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.