Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Is Autoland light essential on airbus?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Is Autoland light essential on airbus?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd June 2010 | 16:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Shanghai, China
Smile Is Autoland light essential on airbus?

In airbus aircraft, the autoland light located on glareshield flashes red when some failures occuers. But could the function of autoland light be subsituded by FMA or EICAS or aural warning?

thx
YaYoSky is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd June 2010 | 19:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: UK
According to the MMEL you don't need any for dispatch providing approach minimums do not require use of autoland. So in reality I take that to be you could go down to Cat 2 with a manual landing. Will also depend on whether your companys MEL is more restrictive or not.
potkettleblack is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd June 2010 | 20:07
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: Glorious West Sussex
FMA - never used for Warnings, only gives positive mode information.
EICAS - not fitted. ECAM warning takes time to read, think about and then react.
Aural warning - presumably you mean a different sound to all the others...would only work if pilots are familiar with the sound and its' meaning.

Big red light right in front of the pilot which only does "Autoland warning" - works well. Yes it is essential.
TyroPicard is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd June 2010 | 22:31
  #4 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 161
From: home
Big red light right in front of the pilot which only does "Autoland warning" - works well. Yes it is essential.
TP is completely right. Consider when it will annunciate and the relevance of its position becomes obvious.
Right Way Up is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd June 2010 | 13:47
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Shanghai, China
Thx for TP's reply. But i still have a question.
Boeing or ERJ a/c don't have this light(when failure occurs during autoland, there will be beaper or "No Autoland" alert). So is the autoland light essential because airbus use sidestick?(while boeing and ERJ use wheel/column)
YaYoSky is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd June 2010 | 16:06
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
Originally Posted by YaYoSky
Thx for TP's reply. But i still have a question.
Boeing or ERJ a/c don't have this light(when failure occurs during autoland, there will be beaper or "No Autoland" alert). So is the autoland light essential because airbus use sidestick?(while boeing and ERJ use wheel/column)
Nothing to do with control wheel or sidestick.

The cockpit displays/warnings philosophy for a given aircraft has to be developed to be internally consistent. however, provided the basic regulations are followed, there is no single required philosophy. So one manufacturer can use lights, one aurals, and neither is right or wrong. provided each works in the context of the rest of the cockpit systems, it's all good.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.