Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Flying a rhumb line track

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Flying a rhumb line track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2010 | 16:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 100
Likes: 1
From: Oakland CA USA
If you're assuming a spherical earth, then 45 S - 0 E to 58 N 136.0758804 E will do the job. Initial great-circle track same as rhumb-line track, 48.10543 degrees.
Tim Zukas is offline  
Reply
Old 27th May 2010 | 13:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
BOAC, After gazillions of posts where we agree, we finally reach a point of disagreement.....

I said, "Of Course, if you have the facility to fly TRUE Tracks and/or Headings, it would be a piece of cake!"

And you said, "- but you would still 'miss' unless you live on a flat earth
"

Ummm, a Rhumb line is a constant TRUE TRACK n'est ce pas?

If the aircraft has the facility to fly True Tracks, with TRK SEL available and used, a continuous True Track would be flown, the perfect Rhumb line! (The B777 that I fly has this facility, and I'm sure that many other aircraft do too.

Ironically, your reference to "flat earth" is somewhat akin to the intent of the original mercator charts, where the earth was mathematically "flattened". (Meridional Parts and all that). And, of course, a straight line on a Mercator chart is a Rhumb line, i.e. a constant True Track.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 27th May 2010 | 21:36
  #23 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I quite agree with those points, OS, but I think we have lost sight of the O Q which was to fly the initial G/C track heading and maintain it as a R/L heading? There are only a few examples where that will 'hit the target'.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 28th May 2010 | 05:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Hello BOAC,

It seems that we do agree after all. I think that the O Q refers to a "loxodrome", which will NOT get you to the destination. I stand by to be corrected on my understanding of the loxodrome, t'was part of my Flight Navigator syllabus 40 years ago, and never had any practical application for it.........

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 29th May 2010 | 15:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Whoops! A loxodrome is a Rhumb Line, I should have checked before posting.

Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!!!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.