Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Super-heavy classification

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Super-heavy classification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2010, 20:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi guys,
as far as I know, the maximum takeoff mass an aircraft has to be higher than for being classified as super-heavy (6/7/8 NM radar separation), is 560.000 kg and, so far, it only applies to the A380: does anyone know if it also applies for the B747-800 ? Is the new 748 a super-heavy ?

Though ain't that sure whether 560.000 Kg is strictly A380-specific or set as a threshold for the new wake turbulence category ...
fredgrav is offline  
Old 11th May 2010, 23:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747-800 MTOW = 442,000 kg
Boeing 747-8 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The only other one that would fit that description is the Antonov AN-225.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 12th May 2010, 01:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So does that mean we will have to start our RT by saying; " BlaBla 367 super heavy, decending out of 370 for 270" ????
Willit Run is offline  
Old 12th May 2010, 07:14
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So does that mean we will have to start our RT by saying; " BlaBla 367 super heavy, decending out of 370 for 270" ????
yep, "super-heavy" shall be added to callsign, and must also be specified in the flt-pln as J wake turbulence category ...
fredgrav is offline  
Old 12th May 2010, 10:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia, maybe
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep, "super-heavy" shall be added to callsign
No, just "Super" is attached, as per PANS-ATM 4.9.2 and Appendix 2 as stated in ICAO TEC/OPS/SEP (T11/72) – 06-0320.SLG
Wake Vortex Aspects of A380 aircraft
Trent 972 is offline  
Old 12th May 2010, 12:19
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, just "Super" is attached
Hi Trent972,
you're right, it's Super: just wrote super-heavy as a simple confirmation to the previous statement (So does that mean ...).
Anyway I found a few discrepancies in between these radar separation minima ...



... and the ones indicated in here, ICAO document dated back to 2006:

Safety management | EUROCONTROL

Did ICAO subsequently tweak the original one (2006) ?
fredgrav is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.