Handflying with yoke
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Handflying with yoke
Hello
I have a question on handflying Boeing and other conventional aircraft. I find some Pilots resting thieir elbow on their armrest while hand flying with the yoke. Others were flying with armrest in the up position.
In fly by wire Airbus. Pilots are required to rest their arm on the specail ouboard armrest. In Boeing what is the SOP.
I thoght Boeing armrests are there just for comfort like car. I would appreciate if you would share your wisdom .
Thank you.
I have a question on handflying Boeing and other conventional aircraft. I find some Pilots resting thieir elbow on their armrest while hand flying with the yoke. Others were flying with armrest in the up position.
In fly by wire Airbus. Pilots are required to rest their arm on the specail ouboard armrest. In Boeing what is the SOP.
I thoght Boeing armrests are there just for comfort like car. I would appreciate if you would share your wisdom .
Thank you.
I always flew with them down. Always keep the 5 point harness done up too.
I was once told by one of the training people that most of the ex military flew with them down, whilst the GA people tended to be the other way.
I was once told by one of the training people that most of the ex military flew with them down, whilst the GA people tended to be the other way.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same as you do in your car using a real stearing wheel. Just have at least one hand on the wheel, if you have been drinking use your armrest or other support, like leg, to drive straight. Airbus is the only airplane that requires method 2 when you are sober.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you high or low altitude, high or low speed, smooth or rough air? Do you need to make fine corrections with your wrist & fingers or larger corrections with your shoulder & elbow? With the armrests down, it is easier to transition seamlessly between the 2 modes: plant your elbow on the armrest to fly with your wrist and/or fingers; lift your elbow to use your shoulder.
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always used the armrests, no matter what type aircraft I was flying, unless of course there were no armrests. One of the first things I do after getting into the seat is lower the armrests and then adjust the seat.
I've noticed that pilots that do not use the armrests tend to not fly as smoothly as those that do use them. I have never heard of any types of restrictions on using or not using armrests.
I've noticed that pilots that do not use the armrests tend to not fly as smoothly as those that do use them. I have never heard of any types of restrictions on using or not using armrests.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,093
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Intruder and Con-Pilot, I found that ex military tended to raise them sometimes, especially the ex fighter pilots, not so much the ex transport pilots.
PPRuNe Handmaiden
I use 1 armrest down and the other one up.
Using armrests certainly makes aerial refueling easier! It is a bit smoother flying with armrests, but not critical like on the Scarebus.
GF
GF
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: FL410
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My TR instructor always used to say that Mr Boeing put those armrests in for a reason, so use them!
Personally I keep them down and find that when flying any kind of approach, it can be quite handy to keep your elbows locked in position on the armrest and move the yoke with your fingers. It helps maintain a reference attitude in terms of remembering where your arms actually are... You can fly a raw data ILS with much greater precision this way.
Personally I keep them down and find that when flying any kind of approach, it can be quite handy to keep your elbows locked in position on the armrest and move the yoke with your fingers. It helps maintain a reference attitude in terms of remembering where your arms actually are... You can fly a raw data ILS with much greater precision this way.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello Captains
i want to thank you for for your kind participation. As I mentioned earlier in Airbuses from A318 to 380. It is mandatory to use the special outboard armrest while handflying. The instructors at Toulose strictly emphasise on this.
I wanted to know what is the procedure with Boeing and hence made this post.
However now it is apparent from all your insight most of your are resting your elbow on your armrest when hand flying. Some of you are keeping the armrest during up position for take offs and landings.
I saw the Boeing 787 dreamliner cockpit video at Boeing website. The chief Boeing test pilot captain Mike Carricker was fling with both armrests in up position.
I then understood that Boeing installed the armrests to rest arms during cruise. However pilots have found using armrests while handflying makes flying smoother . Also it is more comfortable.
At the same time there are others who find find armrests restrictive. They prefer to fly with both armrests in up position.
When it comes to flying a fly by wire Airbus. The use of out board armrest is a must .
In the world of Boeing the use of armrest is pilots personal preference.
Once again Gentlemen thank you very much for your contribitions.
i want to thank you for for your kind participation. As I mentioned earlier in Airbuses from A318 to 380. It is mandatory to use the special outboard armrest while handflying. The instructors at Toulose strictly emphasise on this.
I wanted to know what is the procedure with Boeing and hence made this post.
However now it is apparent from all your insight most of your are resting your elbow on your armrest when hand flying. Some of you are keeping the armrest during up position for take offs and landings.
I saw the Boeing 787 dreamliner cockpit video at Boeing website. The chief Boeing test pilot captain Mike Carricker was fling with both armrests in up position.
I then understood that Boeing installed the armrests to rest arms during cruise. However pilots have found using armrests while handflying makes flying smoother . Also it is more comfortable.
At the same time there are others who find find armrests restrictive. They prefer to fly with both armrests in up position.
When it comes to flying a fly by wire Airbus. The use of out board armrest is a must .
In the world of Boeing the use of armrest is pilots personal preference.
Once again Gentlemen thank you very much for your contribitions.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at the slightly wider picture, by placing your elbow or forearm on a fixed surface, armrest, you are removing a mechanical link, your upper arm, from the control system linkage. This results in it being easier to make small movements with a finer degree of control and precision.
For those of us who came into aviation via sporting light aircraft, especially gliders, we were taught on conversion to an aircraft with a cranked (bent) control stick (think libelle or astir type gliders) without a parallelogram type linkage (eg kestrel) then NOT resting your forearm on your thigh would normally result in PIO (pilot induced oscillations). In the event of the aircraft pitching nose up, the inertia in your forearm would cause the stick to move back, resulting in further pitch up. Pushing forward, the nose goes down, you unload the force on your arm, and you pitch even more down than you expected. In the past this has resulted in heavy damage and even injury. This is the reason I believe Airbooos insist on using the armrest.
For those of us who came into aviation via sporting light aircraft, especially gliders, we were taught on conversion to an aircraft with a cranked (bent) control stick (think libelle or astir type gliders) without a parallelogram type linkage (eg kestrel) then NOT resting your forearm on your thigh would normally result in PIO (pilot induced oscillations). In the event of the aircraft pitching nose up, the inertia in your forearm would cause the stick to move back, resulting in further pitch up. Pushing forward, the nose goes down, you unload the force on your arm, and you pitch even more down than you expected. In the past this has resulted in heavy damage and even injury. This is the reason I believe Airbooos insist on using the armrest.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you fully. You gave a very good account why it is important to rest the arm on an armrest when flying glider aircraft. The same can be said about fighter aircraft and Helicopter pilots. All the fighter pilots rest their arm on their thigh while handflying with flight stick and cyclic stick. Yes , Pilot induced oscillation can be eliminatated when arm is rested on a supporting structure.
No wonder Airbus made a unique armrest with height and angle adjustments for all their fly by wire aircraft.
The yoke has lots of tension and large range of travel. The Boeing yokes are back driven and duplicate the feel of a cable aircraft to certain extent. They are not sensitive like a sidestick.
Do you think pilot induced oscillations can happen in a Boeing jetliner yoke ?
No wonder Airbus made a unique armrest with height and angle adjustments for all their fly by wire aircraft.
The yoke has lots of tension and large range of travel. The Boeing yokes are back driven and duplicate the feel of a cable aircraft to certain extent. They are not sensitive like a sidestick.
Do you think pilot induced oscillations can happen in a Boeing jetliner yoke ?
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fly a 737, and yes, I use the armrests for the stated reasons... as for PIOs in large Boeings - of course they can occur, but I would say that they are limited to certain regimes where stability is low anyway (such as lateral instability during a flaps 40 approach in the 737).