Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Anti-ice usage

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Anti-ice usage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 18:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FL350
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anti-ice usage

With reference to usage of Engine Anti-ice usage on the B737NG

Engine anti-ice must be used if in icing or anticipated icing conditions during CLB & CRZ until temp drops below -40degrees celcius. Exceptions to this ofcourse is on the descent, where it is to be used even if below -40.

Is this -40degrees(for CRZ & CLB) like a definitive(or conservative) figure? does this mean that the engine WILL NOT pick up any icing at temperatures below -40?

Personally, I have noticed mild ice on the wiper blades below this temperature

What criteria does everyone else use?

Thanks
B777Heavy is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 18:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall reading somewhere (possibly circular or FCTM) that Boeing warns against using the wiper blades as a means for determining icing build up, as the wiper blades actuall cause an area of stagnant air underneath them.

the attachment bolt is a much beter indicator, or if fitted ..an ice detector
Romeo E.T. is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 19:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Covered somewhere else here - based on the 'physics' of water vapour that below -40 the amount of water vapour in air is very small. Does NOT allow, however, for standing wave and strong convection which can carry water-laden air far into the sky, well below -40.
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 22:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Daansaaf
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The air stagnates below the wiper blades and moisture run-off tends to collect there. Once the air temperature is below freezing, the collected moisture freezes, unsurprisingly. It will then remain there until it melts; either in direct sunlight or more often in the descent (after n hours) when the air temperature rises. Ice often forms under the wiper blade on a CAVOK day due to condensation on the nose running back.

Practically, ice below the wiper blades on a 737 is not a useful indication of airframe icing.

Ice on the wiper bolt is better and severe icing is often indicated by icing on the windscreen on the middle and outer sections of the front panes. Next time you see it on the bolt or window, check the leading edges and then apply wing anti-ice and watch the ice fly off.

Have a look here Ice & Rain with thanks to Chris Brady.
shlittlenellie is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 22:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Covered somewhere else here - based on the 'physics' of water vapour that below -40 the amount of water vapour in air is very small. Does NOT allow, however, for standing wave and strong convection which can carry water-laden air far into the sky, well below -40.
Absolutely correct.
Switch the engine anti-icing on...and leave it ON, if in doubt.

Leave the the test pilot duties to...test pilots.
That is what they are paid for...big surprise.
411A is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 07:26
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FL350
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies...

hmmm....makes alot of sense....wipers are not a good indication!!

After posting the initial post, I googled anti-ice and came up with a NASA website which says "ice essentially forms at temps between 2degrees celcius & -20degrees celcius". So the -40 maybe conservative after all.
B777Heavy is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 07:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-40degrees celcius
. . . is the same as -40F, so in this case it wouldn't be necessary to say celsius. Incidentally, there's no money out of your pocket to run engine/nacelle anti ice, or is there?
GlueBall is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 09:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the rain
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is actually, an increase in fuel consumption of 2-10% depending on configuration.

If memory serves this is due to bleed air being diverted to the anti-icing system.

S.
babotika is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 13:23
  #9 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely correct.
Switch the engine anti-icing on...and leave it ON, if in doubt.
Absolutely! And, in spite of the Green World we now live in, sometimes idle thrust descents are not a great idea. And, if it is at all turbulent, continuous ignition as well (some aircraft require that I believe).
aterpster is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2010, 12:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you!!!!

BOAC and 411A are correct! May God bless you both.

I used to have all kinds of trouble with the numb-nuts who never read the SOP...or the FCTM. This isn't difficult, people! Just read the manuals....
They tell you the definitive skinny on what is correct.

Fly safe,

PantLoad
PantLoad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.