Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Query regarding TCAS.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Query regarding TCAS.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2010, 10:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Query regarding TCAS.

During a sim session yesterday (ATC) we were discussing transponder failures. The scenario was then posed if aircraft A has a transponder failure (lets say mode A and C) and aircraft B with a fully serviceable transponder comes within range of a TCAS RA is it reasonable to say

1/ Aircraft B will receive no TA/RA BUT Aircraft A will
2/ Aircraft B will receive no TA/RA NOR will Aircraft A

The question(I guess) is whether or not an aircraft requires a serviceable transponder to RECIEVE TCAS instructions.

Thanks in advance

EW
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2010, 12:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on partial or total failure of the transponder. If it fails in just transmit/receive, then 1. might be correct. Air to air coordination would still be impossible, probably causing own TCAS Fail annunciation, however. Actual performance may depend on the TCAS/transponder manufacturer.

A total transponder failure would shut off own aircraft altitude info to the TCAS, causing it to be inoperative, making 2. correct for sure.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2010, 22:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the Honeywell device used by my company, the aircraft altitude input to the TCAS is direct from the ADC. Therefore aircraft A would receive normally TCAS warnings, but aircraft B would be blind to the presence of aircraft A: answer 1.
Pub User is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 00:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pre-dep area
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the way you wrote down the choices is a bit... discombobulating

The one w/o TXPR will happily fly away ignorant of what might have been, while the other w/ a functioning unit will try to maintain separation.
capt. solipsist is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 05:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What category airplane, Pub User, and what level TCAS?

Arinc spec for ACAS/TCAS II has the transponder relay altitude data to the TCAS, and there is no direct connection between the ADC and the TCAS interrogator.

TCAS doesn't interrogate mode A from the other aircraft's transponder, only mode C and mode S (if equipped). Aircraft B cannot see a plane without operative mode C.

Aircraft A TCAS will annunciate Fail if it is not receiving own aircraft altitude - and aircraft id number - from its transponder, which isn't clear in the question. Without a working transponder, moreover, there can be no aircraft to aircraft maneuver coordination.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 08:33
  #6 (permalink)  
Nightrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is basically the same scenario as if the transponder of aircraft A is not powered. There is no communication from this particular unit to any other aircraft or ground unit. Data to the acas unit are non-existent or void.
The XPDR and acas unit of aircraft A, however, are not switched off, they MAY be able to receive a communication through . Due to the unavailability of comparing these data with own data it will, however, not calculate any position or threat at all.

As Greybeard said, there is a FAIL annunciation and no further data are displayed.
 
Old 21st Mar 2010, 09:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,679
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by capt. solipsist
The one w/o TXPR will happily fly away ignorant of what might have been, while the other w/ a functioning unit will try to maintain separation.
And from where will the one with the functioning unit get its data? The other one's transponder has failed. There is no data.

Wasn't this almost identical to the circumstance of the midair in Brazil?
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 10:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
good post graybeard.Your avio knowledge is very good.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 02:34
  #9 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 1 mode s - B 1 mode s dual RA
A 1 mode s - B 1 mode c single RA/single TA
A 1 mode c - B 1 mode c dual TA only
A 1 mode s or c - B total failure - nothing nada or zip maybe splat

Are there not general piloting rules to make decision to climb or desend based on heading with the lack of a RA (if you have the time)?

Mode a is completely useless to TCAS it does not report altitude as I understand.

Also to add that I am referring to TCAS II (most do not make the distinction anymore).

The next form of collision avoidance is supposed to operate on a horizontal platform as well, there is much debate in justifying it's need.

Last edited by muduckace; 25th Mar 2010 at 03:03.
muduckace is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 05:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Mode a is completely useless to TCAS it does not report altitude as I understand
Not so. TCAS will still plot the target in azimuth and issue a T/A. You certainly should not take avoiding action based soley on this, but it is a tool to try and aquire the aircraft visually.

Lots of Mode A only aircraft in the UK, and you quite often get T/As from aircraft that are seperated vertically from you.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 10:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mode A is used and if received could result in TA but not RA.

In the original scenario there isn't enough info to make a call. If the transponder has failed completely then aircraft A doesn't exist to aircraft B. If the transponder can still receive then it could provide TA for aircraft A.

RA is a contract and both sides need to be able to negotiate it. That means listen and talk. TA is one sided and that side only needs to be aware of the other.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 10:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Mode a is completely useless to TCAS it does not report altitude as I understand

Not so. TCAS will still plot the target in azimuth and issue a T/A. You certainly should not take avoiding action based soley on this, but it is a tool to try and aquire the aircraft visually.

Lots of Mode A only aircraft in the UK, and you quite often get T/As from aircraft that are seperated vertically from you.
TCAS does not interrogate mode A. It doesn't care what the intruders 4096 code is so interrogating it is a waste of bandwidth. It only sends Mode C interrogations (plus Mode S calls to the aircraft on its roll call).

What people call "Mode A" transponders are in fact mode A and C transponders, but without an altitude encoder (or if it's turned off). i.e. they still reply to mode C all call, but they just send an empty pulse frame. But this allows TCAS to perform a time versus speed of light calculation for range.

So, if you have an A+C aircraft whose mode C has actually failed, i.e. it is not responding to mode C all call, then TCAS will not see it.

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 10:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mode A is used and if received could result in TA but not RA.
No, see my previous.

RA is a contract and both sides need to be able to negotiate it.
That is only true for coordinated RAs.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 10:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,789
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
CB,

Not aware of that,(re mode "A") thanks for the info.

That being said, are actual Mode A only TXPs even still being manufactured?

Quite right that a TCAS equipped aircraft will issue an RA to avoid a mode C but NON TCAS one.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 10:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That being said, are actual Mode A only TXPs even still being manufactured?
As far as I can tell, no. You notice that all recent transponders say things like "On" and "On + Alt" rather than "A" and "A+C". I asked the CAA about this and they said that all transponders have to be at least A and C.

(Which I guess also implies you wouldn't get a radio licence for an older non compliant model).

Thing is there is a vast ammount of literature that is wrong about TCAS and Mode A, but usually its "two wrongs make a right" on the end result so its almost an academic distinction.

pb
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 11:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt Pit Bull

My quote was directly from a Honeywell certification paper so you may need to give them a call and put them right.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 11:35
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure thing. Give me the title of your reference and I'll point them at the appropriate ARINC spec for data formats.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2010, 12:37
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt Pit Bull,

PM'd.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2010, 10:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which is all a lengthy way of saying "you still need to look out of the window to stay alive....."
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2010, 01:19
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Folks

Thank you all for your input(even if I seemed discombobulating !) I have copied the replies to our guys and they are enjoying the debate.

Best


EW
eastern wiseguy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.