Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Sidestick a/c landing - de-rotation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Sidestick a/c landing - de-rotation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th February 2010 | 15:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Changi
Sidestick a/c landing - de-rotation

Hi guys,

Just want to seek some advice on de-rotation of the airbus a/c on landing. Do you "land" nosewheel or do you hold the attitude until the a/c loses lift ? Can't seems to appreciate it.

Thanks a lot in advance.

Cheers
lion-g is offline  
Reply
Old 20th February 2010 | 16:42
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
From: Floating around the planet
I land the nosewheel
A-3TWENTY is offline  
Reply
Old 20th February 2010 | 17:21
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 24
From: England
Land the nosewheel so as far as stick neutral
Superpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 20th February 2010 | 17:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi lion-g,

You could always cheat and see what the FCTM says.

DEROTATION
Applicable to: ALL
When the aircraft is on the ground, pitch and roll control operates in Direct Law. Consequently, when
the aircraft touches down, the pilot flies the nose down conventionally, varying sidestick input as
required, to control the derotation rate.
After touch down, when reverse thrust is selected (on at least one engine) and one main landing gear
strut is compressed, the ground spoilers partially extend to establish ground contact. The ground
spoilers fully extend when both main landing gears are compressed. A small nose down term on the
elevators is introduced by the control law, which compensates the pitch up tendency with ground
spoiler extension.
It is not recommended to keep the nose high in order to increase aircraft drag during the initial part
of the roll-out, as this technique is inefficient and increases the risk of tail strike. Furthermore, if auto
brake MED is used, it may lead to a hard nose gear touch down.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 20th February 2010 | 17:40
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 152
From: Oop north
Agree - land it, but gently. The way I find I do it is once the main wheels are down, just gently release the back pressure on the sidestick until the nosewheel is down. Once it's down, release to neutral.

You don't want to release it too quick and slam it down, but presumably it's also not too good an idea to hold it up for too long (remember your pedals are giving you directional control through the nosewheel as well as the rudder.) Speaking of which, here is a good video of a pilot doing exactly that in a BWIA A340 at Manchester a few years ago.
Zippy Monster is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 01:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Changi
LOL

"What an extraordinary expression! Where on earth did that come from???"
I was wondering that too Somehow I read it in the FCTM as well

Thanks for all your input ....

Can somebody shed some light or the exact technique on "landing" the nosewheel?

Do you relax the sidestick and do a "miniflare" just before moment of impact? Or according to the video mentioned above, it seems like he hold the landing attitude as long as possible until the lift reduces as the speed bleed off.

Any inputs are very welcome as I am VERY VERY new to this sidestick game.

Thanks again

Cheers

Last edited by lion-g; 21st February 2010 at 01:36.
lion-g is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 01:50
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Around the world.
I find personally:

A319: I haven't flown one for a few years, but I remember similar technique to the A320.

A320: After touchdown ease off back pressure, allow the nose to come down and just before the nose touches I 'blip' some back pressure to give a smooth touch down of the nose.

A321: After a smooth touchdown it needs a touch of forward pressure to prevent any pitch up with spoilers coming out, then rapidly release this back to neutral and some back stick to smoothly bring the nose down. Preventing any pitch up is especially important on this aircraft to prevent tailstrike.

I hear: A330: After mains touch a little forward pressure to land the forward MLG wheels smoothly then some back pressure as the nose comes down.
tom775257 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 02:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: uk
after your mains touch, you must '"accompany"the nose by releasing the stick.

it' s call accompanying landing. FCOM 2.3543
flyprototype is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 06:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
I have read "de-rotation" in many other taxts...

try googling it and eliminating "medical". There is an NTSB pdf about hard langing vs derotation accidents.

English is a very rich language, isn't it?
Microburst2002 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 10:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 998
From: Seat 1A
Even the shuttle pilots use it (towards the end of this video):

YouTube - Cockpit View of Shuttle Landing!

...although I prefer the word "de-flare", as that is exactly what is being done.

Did I hear you say "Roll It On!", Bloggs??
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 11:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Agaricus bisporus. What Cheer? (Whatcha)

Oh my golly gosh and balderdash. Where did you get "Strewth!" from?

A rotation by x degrees (vertically in aviation, horizontally clockwise in printing etc.) could be cancelled by a de-rotation by x degrees in both cases. You'll find the term in lots of modern parlance, including Airbus manuals.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 12:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: More or less all over the place
rotation:
moving POSITIVE (UP) around the lateral axis, pitching UP

DE-rotation:
moving NEGATIVE (DOWN) around the lateral axis, pitching DOWN

learner…
learner001 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 14:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Canada
De rotation,thats right up there with,"at this point in time",{the long form of now} Or "going forward in time" {the future} or "negative cash flow"{your broke} "Colatteral damage",{missed the bad guys} Ah the age of Bafflegab is here!
clunckdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 21st February 2010 | 16:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Front right seat
In the A319 I would gently fly the no wheel down as it wasn't at all an issue. You just dont want to loose elevator effectiveness and let the nose fall onto the ground. On the A346 you need to positively de-rotate the nose down. It very possible to be left with the nose in the air and run out of elevator control in the A346. On the A342/A343 I aggressively de-rotate after the first of the rear wheels touch to try and avoid the second thump that seems to haunt me.

DH
divinehover is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2010 | 15:04
  #15 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 263
Likes: 2
From: Canada
rotation:
moving POSITIVE (UP) around the lateral axis, pitching UP

DE-rotation:
moving NEGATIVE (DOWN) around the lateral axis, pitching DOWN



Remind me......regarding rotation about the longitudinal axis…..banking to the left…..rotation and banking to the right de-rotation or is it the other way around. Always get that confused!

Bloody hell, rotation and de-rotation. Why is it that we as an industry insist on bafflegab again? Oh that’s right, we must keep up the pretense to the masses that we are superhuman after all.
604guy is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2010 | 18:36
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: Glorious West Sussex
For Bafflegabbers everywhere..
Can you produce a single English word for us to use instead of derotation? Blowed if I can think of one...
TyroPicard is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2010 | 00:00
  #17 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 263
Likes: 2
From: Canada
[I][/single English word for us to use instead of derotationI]

Um, in this context how about "lower"

To paraphrase DH....... Please ignore Agaricus bisporus and the nonsense he speaks. In the A319 I would gently fly the nose wheel down as it wasn't at all an issue. You just don't want to lose elevator effectiveness and let the nose fall onto the ground. On the A346 you need to positively lowerthe nose. It's very possible to be left with the nose in the air and run out of elevator control in the A346. On the A342/A343 I aggressively lower the nose after the first of the rear wheels touch to try and avoid the second thump that seems to haunt me.

I'm a great believer in KISS
604guy is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2010 | 01:59
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Changi
Hi guys,

Just to share my experience from yesterday. I had to "hold off" quite a bit to ensure the nose wheel touched down gently. Quite different from Boeing where I tends to ease the control column forward.

Will try again soon...

Thanks for all the replies ... keep them coming !!!

Cheers
lion-g is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2010 | 01:57
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Pitch up moment.

Could you kindly elaborate on the pitch up tendency at spoiler deployment.
Thanks,
NA
notanastronaut is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2010 | 08:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi notanastronaught,

Could you kindly elaborate on the pitch up tendency at spoiler deployment.
The FCTM mentions this effect (please see earlier post) - but typically there is no explanation given. Either the center of pressure of the wing moves inboard (bigger effect of panels 5), or the airflow over the tail is changed (with panels 1 deploying).

It's a mystery!
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.