A320 Rat To Start The Apu
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: British
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A320 Rat To Start The Apu
Just an idle moments thought.
When in emrg elec config you don't start the APU in order to save battery life ( 3 mins per APU start ). Why not have a separate ' RAT' like item on the APU, with the sole job of starting the APU independently of batteries?
Would it not make those long T16 nights a little more warm and fuzzy?
Your thoughts?
When in emrg elec config you don't start the APU in order to save battery life ( 3 mins per APU start ). Why not have a separate ' RAT' like item on the APU, with the sole job of starting the APU independently of batteries?
Would it not make those long T16 nights a little more warm and fuzzy?
Your thoughts?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAT generates electrical power hardly enough for AC ESS and DC ESS busses (not SHED busses), and BLUE HYD SYS. Battery is meant as the last mean of supplying power to the a/c while in EMER ELEC CONFIG so had better not to be used for an APU start attempt. A second RAT surely can't be the solution, otherwise it will be necessary to install another EMER GEN and its own GCU, thus significantly increasing the aircraft weight, also keepin' in mind that a RAT can stall and must be in the right place ... just my thought ! 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thing is, how useful would the APU actually be in the emergency electrical configuration?
Since one engine generator can drive the whole network, it seems likely that to end up in the emergency configuration the AC buses would be so damaged that the APU generator would be unlikely to latch anyway. Worth gambling away 3 mins of battery time?
Alternatively, if you established the configuration due to smoke, then you wouldn't need the APU generator.
Since one engine generator can drive the whole network, it seems likely that to end up in the emergency configuration the AC buses would be so damaged that the APU generator would be unlikely to latch anyway. Worth gambling away 3 mins of battery time?
Alternatively, if you established the configuration due to smoke, then you wouldn't need the APU generator.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fly with no fear along the T16, you lucky man, when the god of wind so dictates.
Start the APU if you had a double GEN fail. Don't, if it was double AC BUS fail (it is useless).
Losing HOT BUS 1 and 2 is not that bad. With the RAT you have all the essential things.
cheers
Start the APU if you had a double GEN fail. Don't, if it was double AC BUS fail (it is useless).
Losing HOT BUS 1 and 2 is not that bad. With the RAT you have all the essential things.
cheers
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it seems likely that to end up in the emergency configuration the AC buses would be so damaged that the APU generator would be unlikely to latch anyway
Dual GEN/IDG failure or TR1 Failure + GEN2 Failure and vice-versa ... why should AC buses be that damaged ? I mean APU GEN can yet be connected and supply the whole network here ...
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Greece
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fredgrav,
1. With TR1 Failure + GEN2 (or vice versa) failure you are not in ELEC EMER CONFIG anyway. Sure, start the APU. All buses are powered.
2. RAT (EMER GEN) powers the essentials, shed buses included.
1. With TR1 Failure + GEN2 (or vice versa) failure you are not in ELEC EMER CONFIG anyway. Sure, start the APU. All buses are powered.
2. RAT (EMER GEN) powers the essentials, shed buses included.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi aristoclis,
I do know we're not in ELEC EMER CONF in the situation previously mentioned ... here's the matter: couldn't quite understand why should the AC busses be so damaged for an APU start to be useful ...
Yep, RAT powers AC ESS + DC ESS + SHED BUSSES, was wrong here ... just mixed up with BAT's power only.
I do know we're not in ELEC EMER CONF in the situation previously mentioned ... here's the matter: couldn't quite understand why should the AC busses be so damaged for an APU start to be useful ...
Yep, RAT powers AC ESS + DC ESS + SHED BUSSES, was wrong here ... just mixed up with BAT's power only.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aristoclis - I was thinking of it this way:
Gen 1 and 2 failure... if it didn't happen simultaneously, then the APU will probably already be running following the first failure. If GEN 1 failed and then GEN 2 failed almost immediately afterwards, an APU start is still possible at the expense of battery life.
AC BUS 1 + 2 failure... well, there's no available AC bus to connect the APU to, so why start it?
Gen 1 and 2 failure... if it didn't happen simultaneously, then the APU will probably already be running following the first failure. If GEN 1 failed and then GEN 2 failed almost immediately afterwards, an APU start is still possible at the expense of battery life.
AC BUS 1 + 2 failure... well, there's no available AC bus to connect the APU to, so why start it?
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Greece
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the failure is AC BUS 1+2, it is obvious tha APU is useless. But in the case that both GEN fail simoultaneously or with short intervall, consider if the failure was caused by something that would cause the APU GEN to fail also, as soon as it powers the AC buses. So be sure not to drain your batteries and end up with a failed APU GEN...
Registered User **
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What may be usefull is a apu rat that direct drives the gearbox as the electric starter does, no battery usage, just a complicated instalation. A gearbox mounted rat that drops out of the APU bay.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: British
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
muckduckace
You've got it, thats what I was getting at. If you can get the apu gen on line without the use of the batteries, you wouldn't be in emerg elec config.
You've got it, thats what I was getting at. If you can get the apu gen on line without the use of the batteries, you wouldn't be in emerg elec config.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would anyone try to install a RAT near the APU / tail cone ? surely either it would stall out regardless of speed or sense reverse aerodynamic flow, depending on how will it be oriented. Not feasible ...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why bother?
In case of dual GEN fail, start APU. All network supplied, except galley.
In case of dual AC BUS fault, forget about the network. Only essential buses supplied by the RAT EMER GEN. What do you want the APU for. To supply the DC BAT and the HOT buses?
Losing HOT BUS 1 and 2 is not that bad, is it?
with the RAT we have all we need
In case of dual GEN fail, start APU. All network supplied, except galley.
In case of dual AC BUS fault, forget about the network. Only essential buses supplied by the RAT EMER GEN. What do you want the APU for. To supply the DC BAT and the HOT buses?
Losing HOT BUS 1 and 2 is not that bad, is it?
with the RAT we have all we need
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: u.k.
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely 2 different mod states to consider here.
For the early 320's follow the checklist which starts with an attempted reset of both generators, if that is unsuccessful then you are stuck in emergency electrical config and an APU start is not reccommended.
For later 320's and all (?) 321's an enhanced RAT is installed, in this case an APU start is allowed after 45secs have elapsed since the loss of both eng generators.
So the enhanced RAT gives the cozy feeling requested on T16, change was somewhare around s/n 1000 for the 320 I think.//
For the early 320's follow the checklist which starts with an attempted reset of both generators, if that is unsuccessful then you are stuck in emergency electrical config and an APU start is not reccommended.
For later 320's and all (?) 321's an enhanced RAT is installed, in this case an APU start is allowed after 45secs have elapsed since the loss of both eng generators.
So the enhanced RAT gives the cozy feeling requested on T16, change was somewhare around s/n 1000 for the 320 I think.//
