Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Boeing 787 cruise altitude

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Boeing 787 cruise altitude

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th August 2010 | 21:22
  #41 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Most aircraft have a max dif of 8psi but presumably the Dreamliner is going to be much more.
Max diff on the 747-400 is 9.4 psi!
TopBunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2010 | 00:22
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: liyjbliugif
Well in my Gulfstream G550, my cruise altitude is 48,000 feet at Mach 0.80 so there can't be an big difference
flytheworldG550 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2010 | 02:20
  #43 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,984
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
If you are cruising at FL480, you are either FL470B490 or don't know that RVSM ends at FL410. In the GLEX, 10.25 psid, gives a cabin at 4,500 when cruising at FL 450.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2010 | 11:33
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: USofA
How about 88,000 # of fuel on a 8 hour flight at Mach .85 starting out at FL380 then 400.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2010 | 13:38
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Originally Posted by Spooky
How about 88,000 # of fuel on a 8 hour flight at Mach .85 starting out at FL380 then 400.
Was that the Seattle/Farnoborough flight for the demo787?
Curious, what was TOW?
kbrockman is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2011 | 19:35
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Marion, South Australia
BOE5

Some interesting Altitude and indicated Groundspeed numbers in this flight to Peurto Rico


FlightAware > Track Log > BOE5 > 25-Jan-2011 > KABQ-TJBQ
mmciau is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2011 | 20:30
  #47 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 9
From: Switzerland, Singapore
It's really pointless to compare the 767 with the 787 - we surely hope that it's better. Why not comparing it to an A330, which is the direct opponent on the market? I guess if it's 20% to the 76 then it would be about 10% to an 33, so not much...
Dani is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.