Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Bae 146 decompression ???

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Bae 146 decompression ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Feb 2010, 09:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Bae 146 decompression ???

Heard a rumour (strange that eh ?!) about a 146 from a South East operator having a decompression somewhere over the East of England ?? anyone know anything about it ?? just curious.......lol

F/o
First.officer is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 09:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do they fly high enough for it to matter?
Basil is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 11:01
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Well, granted they may not fly at an altitude/FL that may cause huge concern, was just keen to know the story (if there is one...!!), just heard one or two rumours about this and was interested ! will wait and see i guess........

First.officer is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 14:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was told they were limited to FL290 because the skin was too thin to take more pressurization.

Pacific Southwest Airlines had a decompression in the 1980s at 270 when #4 engine came apart and sent hot shrapnel into the cabin. It missed everybody, but pieces were sizzling on the carpet as SLF kicked them around to prevent a fire.

rdr
Graybeard is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 15:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southampton
Age: 60
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 146 is certified to FL310 or FL300 depending on model. They're limited to FL280 simply because they are not RVSM capable. I think that the ASI is not corrected for compressibility and thus you have to level off approx 100ft below your planned FL and the aircraft will apparently "climb" the last bit as the speed increases.

I did a test flight once at FL310 in the 146 unpressurised. There was an almost overwhelming desire to take the mask off just to see what would happen.
IrishJetdriver is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 15:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There was an almost overwhelming desire to take the mask off just to see what would happen.
Good idea to have someone standing by to replace O2 mask
You just lose consciousness - there one second, gone the next.
No feeling of dizziness or other warning - I argued with the doc that I hadn't passed out - I had.
Basil is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 15:46
  #7 (permalink)  
Clone of Victor Meldrew
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: england
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite staggering!

Last evening I overheard guys talking about this event in my local pub!

The the gist of the story related to an airtest, problems with a hatch lock and the crew oxygen.

I just hope the flight was not being flown by a management pilot!!

390
Waiting for the final report!
390cruise is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 16:15
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thanks for the info. guys - most useful !

Interesting about the pub conversation 390cruise - guess that confirms my source is at least correct in that it happened ! lol - and totally agree, would be awfully embarassing i guess if a management pilot !

First.officer is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 17:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rapid Decompression at 20,000ft, time of useful consciousness = 3mins.
Perhaps the CAA will deliver out 1000 lines to the individual concerned:

"I will do my checks before I start the aircraft"
"I will do my checks before I start the aircraft"
"I will.......

The fact I have to fly up in the air in the same airspace as this imbecile is simply abhorrent. It's a disgrace!
SkyKite69 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 17:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Low Pressure Training Chamber

There was an almost overwhelming desire to take the mask off just to see what would happen.
Have you never gone "up" in a low pressure training chamber?
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 23:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was told they were limited to FL290 because the skin was too thin to take more pressurization.
and

The 146 is certified to FL310 or FL300 depending on model. They're limited to FL280 simply because they are not RVSM capable.
Utter crap!

The max operating altitude depends on the pressurisation system fitted.

If you have a BAe Dynamics analogue system, it's FL300 or FL310.

If you have an NGL analogue system, it's also FL300 or FL310.

However, if you have an NGL digital system fitted, the max operating altitude is FL350.

FCOM 2.2.13 for anyone who doesn't believe me...

And the airframe is plenty strong enough to go higher than that, being British...

Also, the only thing you need to do to a 146 to get RVSM approval is fit proper digital altimeters. That fixes all the altimeter inaccuracies that have always plagued the 146.
remoak is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 17:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East England
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed the 146 is one of the original Brick outhouses.....but take a look at one when pressurised on the ground!! (Maintenance Procedure). The fwd fuselage where there are few if any stringers and only the frames and skin the skin can be seen to bulge out between the frames!! A good machine to keep flying...
spannersatKL is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 17:53
  #13 (permalink)  
Dash-7 lover
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I tend to believe Irish Jet Driver re RVSM. The elderly 146's we had in Citiexpress were limited to FL260 even on MAN-FRA and INV-LGW, probably because it was dangerous to fly them any higher lol. Mind you the most basic of machines G-MABR proved her worth many times over.

I thought the hairdryers would prove useless above FL260, then what do you expect from engines that worked better on helicopters...

And that brings me to the E145 that although limited to FL370 hit FL390 to clear the top of a CB and was briefly grounded on arrival for checks. No doubt there's redundancy built in all of these.
 
Old 5th Feb 2010, 18:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I can confirm that it was a relatively easy exercise to upgrade the BAe146's altimetry so that it would conform to RVSM requirements.

However, the mods were horrendously expensive and simply not worth the effort.

The reduction in fuel burn between F310 with RVSM and F280 without RVSM was pretty well negligble.

Don't forget that the average stage length was probably less than 1.5 hours so you weren't up there for very long.

From my point of view, the best part of flying the 146 was the fact that it ran out of fuel after 3.5 hours! (Sitting on your ar*e for 14 hours is not the best of fun once the novelty has worn off).
JW411 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 20:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infinity and Beyond
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once did ZAG-MAD and that was around the 4 hr mark. 146-300 could hit FL310 whereas the -100/-200 were FL290 limited from memory. Could not enter RVSM airspace due to the altimetry system originating from a sopwith camel! Aircraft without the TGT roll back (eng a/ice valve mod) being incorporated were limited to FL260 in icing conditions.

Still a pretty decent aircraft but it did keep us engineers busy, great for contracting though....lots of overtime!
AEUENG is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 08:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: on the ragged edge
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
God I loved the low alt 146. With ALF 502/503's, we were blowing engines left and right on the 100, so the company took us out and three-engined takeoff qualled all of us in the actual airplane! They figured we were all going to be at an out station and would need to ferry it back to a mtc base sooner or later! Interesting procedure. We wouldn't spool up the asymmetrical engine until 80 kts.

That was my first clue to update my resume....

Solution was to throttle back to .75 cruise according to Avco Lycoming. Of course, on a busy corridor in the cheap fuel days that made us very unpopular. We started having to file for FL260 and often got much lower because ATC got tired of vectoring us off the airway to let everybody by.

But with those big beautiful picture windows on a new airplane at low altitude over the mountains it was a shear delight, even if it wasn't particularly profitable. Next job was old 74 freighters where most of the windows were so crazed I couldn't see out at all!

Ah the 146. Small gas tanks, pretty girls, home all the time...
Not sure now why I wanted to commute just to fly the big iron....
Captain-Crunch is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 08:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 65
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In early 1990s a BAe146 suffered a total (yep all 4) engine failure/s due icing. The aircraft was operating at FL310 between Karratha and Perth when the crew called mayday.

Engine restart was achieved when the aircraft was around 10,000ft. VH-JJP was the reg operating as Airlines of WA flight. Since then all Australian 146s have been limited to below FL290.

I am pretty sure the limitation is still in effect. ATSB report should be available on the ATSB site.
ozineurope is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 09:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Solution was to throttle back to .75 cruise
<cough> Mmo 0.72 iirc (for the RJ ayway, I doubt the 146 was higher)
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 09:34
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On th RJ100 and RJ85, with a digital press sytem max alt is FL350. With the analogue system it's FL330. VMO .72, typical .70 crz speed.
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 09:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 65
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bral - ta.

I was on APP in Perth the night it happened. Very quiet room when he made the call and for the next 20 minutes or so. Was most pleased when he got them going again, not as pleased as the people on board though!!
ozineurope is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.