Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

MEL caution/warning section

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

MEL caution/warning section

Old 2nd Feb 2010, 16:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MEL caution/warning section

For some caution/warning there is false/actual position. Could anybody explain me this in a way of easy understanding, because MEL explanation is not enough for me.

Spasibo
Boroda is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2010, 19:52
  #2 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you refering to caution and warning (ch 31 I think) of a specific aircraft or consequences of a failed component on MEL?
muduckace is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2010, 20:01
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MEL 320 has chapter CAUTION/WARNING MESSAGES. This chapter helps identify easily respective MEL reference page. But smtms I see two references for the same caution/warning: false caution - refer to....; actual caution - refer to ....
Boroda is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2010, 20:32
  #4 (permalink)  
9.G
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boroda, as the name suggests. If it's a false warning treat it as one, if it's real treat it as real. Digital airplane implies sometimes that warnings are triggered without actual conditions being met.
9.G is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2010, 02:43
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can I evaluate if that message is real or false? Aircraft is digital, I am not.
Boroda is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2010, 11:00
  #6 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
(M)MEL states in preamble that it should be used after troubleshooting not instead of it. So, by the time you open the book, one already knows whether you face a system malfunction or false indication. For some problems, a qualified engineer is requried to distigusih between the two. Correct?

FD (the un-real)
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2010, 17:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It should be clear from the MEL item Tech Log entry whether it is a fault or a false indication - pilots do not decide that, engineers do. (Except in flight of course - confirm failure on SD/FAULT light before ECAM actions).
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2010, 17:59
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spasibo, becomes clearer
Boroda is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 03:31
  #9 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One way I use to check if a warning was spurious is to select the CFD function and select CURRENT LEG ECAM, if the warning you received does not record, then I assume it's false or spurious.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2010, 12:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South of N9000'.0
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One way I use to check if a warning was spurious is to select the CFD function and select CURRENT LEG ECAM, if the warning you received does not record, then I assume it's false or spurious.
True, but place heavier emphasis on spurious .
PappyJ is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 19:58
  #11 (permalink)  
9.G
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It should be clear from the MEL item Tech Log entry whether it is a fault or a false indication - pilots do not decide that, engineers do. (Except in flight of course - confirm failure on SD/FAULT light before ECAM actions).
It's always the captain who decides how to treat the corresponding warning. Engineers might offer a option but it's always a commander who decides whether to accept it or not. All depends on the failure, the history as well as all the other pertaining factors.
9.G is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.