Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Shorhaul Versus Longhaul

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Shorhaul Versus Longhaul

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2010, 21:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shorhaul Versus Longhaul

Hi,

I sometimes read that engines & wings are optimized for the cruise (spent more time there).

-How an engine in shorthaul aircraft is optimized since takeoff and climb may/will take longer time than cruise?

-How an engine in shorthaul aircraft (spent more time in takeoff and climb) is different than an engine in longhaul (spent more time in cruise)?

-How a wing is optimized in shorthaul aircraft (less time in cruise) and how it is different than a wing in longhaul (more time in cruise)?

I am not stating that engines and wings are (or should be) different by design depending on their missions, I am wondering if they are?

Feedback appreaciated
Regards
AeroTech is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2010, 10:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not stating that engines and wings are (or should be) different by design depending on their missions, I am wondering if they are?
Hi,

I don't think there is any significant difference because of the Flight Levels and speeds they fly at as calculated by their FMC. A heavy long haul aircraft will not climb as high as a lighter short haul aircraft initially - but both will be flying at their optimum speeds (heavy will be faster), and their respective optimum altitudes. As the long haul aircraft uses fuel, it will climb to its next optimum altitude etc. The heavy long haul may only reach it's final cruising altitude say an hour or so before it descends to destination.

In the days when there far fewer aircraft, a "cruise climb" technique was used, where climb power was set and the aircraft allowed to climb slowly as the weight reduced. (I believe Concord did) So those long haul heavies spent most of their time in the climb and less in the "cruise".

Last edited by rudderrudderrat; 27th Jan 2010 at 11:45. Reason: extra line
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2010, 11:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Special B744 "domestic" short range versions have no winglets, no tail tank, fewer galleys and higher density seating up to 568 pax. Some versions are fitted with additional windows on the upper deck.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2010, 16:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Ingteresting idea. But a typical 737 or 320 will do anything from a short twenty minute trip to long sectors of four hours and more, all with exactly the same engine..
PENKO is online now  
Old 28th Jan 2010, 16:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, from 20 minute block time sectors up to over 5 hours, in extreme cases up to 6 or 7 hours will be done with the same plane, a so-called short haul one (in our case 737 and A320 family). However, we do operate A330s on sectors between 35 minutes up to 12 or 13 hours.
Denti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.