Cold weather MAP/RPM question
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cold weather MAP/RPM question
I have a total brain block here, could you help me out please.
Say you are cruising with a set MAP+RPM at 65% power combination, leaned to best economy in ISA conditions at 4000ft. Naturally aspirated engine.
Suddenly the temperature of the air is decreased by 30C. None of the engine controls are touched.
What happens to MAP and engine output in % ? Increase or decrease.
How does the picture change if the engine is carburated or fuel injected?
Say you are cruising with a set MAP+RPM at 65% power combination, leaned to best economy in ISA conditions at 4000ft. Naturally aspirated engine.
Suddenly the temperature of the air is decreased by 30C. None of the engine controls are touched.
What happens to MAP and engine output in % ? Increase or decrease.
How does the picture change if the engine is carburated or fuel injected?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi
I didn't quite get the meaning of this part "lean of peak range where fuel flow translates directly into power output".
If the temperature of the air decreases, doesn't mass flow of air through the carburator increase? As it does, fuel flow would also increase, which would cause a slight power output increase, indicated by a MAP increase?
I know this may sound odd, but I can't get my head around it and I'll soon tell why
I didn't quite get the meaning of this part "lean of peak range where fuel flow translates directly into power output".
If the temperature of the air decreases, doesn't mass flow of air through the carburator increase? As it does, fuel flow would also increase, which would cause a slight power output increase, indicated by a MAP increase?
I know this may sound odd, but I can't get my head around it and I'll soon tell why
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have a guess: MAP would increase (more dense air), FF would increase, Power would increase, IAS would increase, TAS would reduce, Drag would increase, SFC would improve.
PM
PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assumed constant fuel flow which wouldn't happen on a carbureted engine when the OAT changes. It may happen however on injected engines where there are corrective measures for varying density but we all know how good it works from time to time...
E.g. You are operating peak egt. You increase MAP with const FF. Would the power change? No. There is simply no fuel left to be burned. Same figure for decreasing temperature. More mass with at constant MAP put into the engine thus operating on the lean side. Now if the fuel controller manages to compensate for the change in density altitude (changing temperature on a constant pressure alt) the power would increase.
I wouldn't be too sure about decreasing TAS, I'm not sure whether increased drag would weigh out increased power (condition: not operating on constant percentage of T/O power as in the POH).
My assumption for the given conditions on a fixed pitch prop would be increasing rpm, decreasing MAP as the power increases and the lower deck pressure drops with increasing RPM and volumeflow.
E.g. You are operating peak egt. You increase MAP with const FF. Would the power change? No. There is simply no fuel left to be burned. Same figure for decreasing temperature. More mass with at constant MAP put into the engine thus operating on the lean side. Now if the fuel controller manages to compensate for the change in density altitude (changing temperature on a constant pressure alt) the power would increase.
I wouldn't be too sure about decreasing TAS, I'm not sure whether increased drag would weigh out increased power (condition: not operating on constant percentage of T/O power as in the POH).
My assumption for the given conditions on a fixed pitch prop would be increasing rpm, decreasing MAP as the power increases and the lower deck pressure drops with increasing RPM and volumeflow.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: N 06/W 75
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have a guess: MAP would increase (more dense air), FF would increase, Power would increase, IAS would increase, TAS would reduce, Drag would increase, SFC would improve.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The engine driven fuel pump forces more fuel through the mixer on higher power settings. Otherwise your engine would be deliberatly flooded when idling on the ground with the mixture set to rich. The mixture only controls a ratio ( in ideal conditions).
The engine would only tend to detonation on very high power settings with a too lean mixture ( t/o). You won't get any engine to detonation on a 50% ( or even higher) power setting whatever the mixture is.
The engine would only tend to detonation on very high power settings with a too lean mixture ( t/o). You won't get any engine to detonation on a 50% ( or even higher) power setting whatever the mixture is.
Since it`s a manual controlled engine, if the temp changes the air density will change,so the mixture will be weaker if it gets colder,weaker if it got warmer..
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If temperature decreases but altitude is maintained (constant pressure) then density increases. But MAP should remain the same since pressure hasn't changed and the throttle valve remains in the same position ¿Right?. % power would be increased, since you would be burning more fuel per stroke, now (more fuel flow).
What would happen with EGT? I don't know. On the one hande, less OAT, less EGT. On the other, more FF, more EGT.
What would happen with EGT? I don't know. On the one hande, less OAT, less EGT. On the other, more FF, more EGT.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi jetay1,
I think:
Pressure remains the same - so does MAP. Greater mass of air into the engine, so power will increase. If fixed prop, air density has a bigger effect on the prop so RPM will fall. If variable pitch prop, RPM will remain the same but pitch will absorb the power. Both will see increase in airspeed.
Carburettor engine will need to be enriched (denser air) to maintain mixture, fuel injected engine will automatically adjust to maintain mixture (mass flow sensor).
I think:
What happens to MAP and engine output in % ? Increase or decrease.
How does the picture change if the engine is carburated or fuel injected?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it would make a difference if you have a constant speed prop or fixed pitch. With constant speed prop, the air mass would increase while the mixture would remain the same, so the mixture ratio would become leaner.
With a fixed pitch prop, there might be an increase in RPM which could trigger other effects. Sorry, long time since I last flew fixed pitch prop or carbs. Search for the John Deakin series on engine management.
With a fixed pitch prop, there might be an increase in RPM which could trigger other effects. Sorry, long time since I last flew fixed pitch prop or carbs. Search for the John Deakin series on engine management.