Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A few questions on ETOPS

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A few questions on ETOPS

Old 29th Dec 2009, 19:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few questions on ETOPS

Good day fellow aviators.

1. From regulatory perspective, should there be at least two alternates between ETOPS entry and exit point (to get criticial point between them)? Is it allowed to have only one alternate between ETOPS entry and exit point IF it covers the whole ETOPS area of operation?


2. Could there be more then one "set" of ETOPS entry and exit points? Say in the beginning of flight and then at the end, or should it be treated as a one whole ETOPS "area"?


3. Is it allowed for route to destination alternate (normal, non-ETOPS alternate) to be ETOPS-route, or should all routes to destination alternates remain within 60 mins from suitable alternates?
GSLOC is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2009, 20:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might want to Google AC120-42B and see if you can find your answer there. Regardless it is s good reference document regarding ETOPS.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2009, 21:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. You never need 2. You always need one. OK, in the end you have two or more for the whole flight. But you just have to have one at a time. How many there are in total for one flight is irrelevant. The change point, where both have the same distance, is the PNR, as you said.

2. Also for that you can have as many as you want. You just need a valid flight plan, and this one has to work according to the Etops rules. You can change your flight plan of course, and some do, you can take a whole bunch of fligth plans with you if you should need it. As soon as you leave inhabited area for a certain distance, you get into Etops area, you have to be covered with a valid alternate (90, 120 or what ever flight times away).

3. Destination alternates have to be within 60 minutes, at least all legal frameworks I flew with, and surely EASA/JAR. Etops is for enroute planning, not for destination alternates. If your destination alternate is further away than 60 minutes, you have none, and you have to calculate with isolated destination.

hth,
Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2009, 23:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: this green & pleasant land
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAP 513 is the CAA publication for ref.

You looking at flying the South Atlantic?
Plane Dumb is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2009, 07:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,791
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
should it be treated as a one whole ETOPS "area"?
That is exactly how it is treated. Draw a "60 minute at one engine inop speed" circle around every adequate airport on a map - and this is the area that a non-ETOPS aircraft is permitted to fly in. The route that it flies - straight line, circles, wiggles etc is irrelevant provided it stays within the permitted area.

For a 90 minute ETOPS approved aircraft, you draw 90 minute circles to determine the area, 180 minutes, 180 minute circles etc. (Wind in this case in not considered, by the way)

It appears as though you are thinking that each route is approved, rather than the ETOPS approval referring to an area of permitted operations.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2009, 10:53
  #6 (permalink)  
9.G
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The route that it flies - straight line, circles, wiggles etc is irrelevant provided it stays within the permitted area.
Depends on route I'd say.
Some particular routes like over Himalaya require specific escape route thus the route becomes a factor. Even though one stays within the approved circle the real diversion will be outside the limits. I remember a particular case with 120 min etops flight via northern Chinese corridor where at some point between the Pakistan and China a diversion back to Chinese ETOPS alternate using DIR TO wans't an option obviously due to terrain. If I recall correctly highest Grid Mora was around 31000 ft.
9.G is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.