Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320, flexible TO not possible

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320, flexible TO not possible

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2009, 19:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question A320, flexible TO not possible

fixedfixed

Last edited by Bambarbia; 30th Oct 2012 at 12:35.
Bambarbia is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2009, 19:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bambarbia,

I'm sorry, I can't answer your question.
After more then twenty years on AB I have the impression performance calculations are kind of voodoo. We, the pilots, are forced to just follow the fuzzy-logic.

Way to less explanations what's behind.

cheers
hetfield is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 09:35
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why should we use TOGA thrust?
Bambarbia is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 09:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Increase your weight to ensure V2 exceeds Vmu. If it allows a FLX TKOFF your actual performance will exceed the performance tabulated.

By using TOGA, you will be using speeds that are promulgated to the maximum weight allowable for the environmental envelope, that will ensure you will exceed Vmu.

Clear as mud!?:
KABOY is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 10:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 30 West
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low Vmu speeds and wet runway deductions will reduce your speeds to the level where you are compromising the a/c from the point of Vmcg and possibly Vmca, TOGA gets rid or that problem for you by using higher speeds.
punchus is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2009, 15:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cork....like.
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...okay, I think it is best to consider Vmu as "Minimum Unstick speed", that is the lowest speed at which the aircraft will become airborne when you rotate. If you rotate at a speed lower than Vmu, you are in real danger of a tailstrike.
Vmu is 1) dependent on weight, typically an A320, 70tonnes=Vmu 140
60 tonnes=Vmu 130kt, etc, but check the actual data from your company.
2) Vmu is also dependent on pressure altitude, obviously if you are at a high altitude airport, the Vmu will be higher, as the less dense air has less lift.
You select TOGA if Vmu is limiting, because the speeds with Toga power, are higher, because you are getting the maximum performance available from the aircraft, and are not really looking at getting the benefit available from longer runways, which is reduced take off power, and maintenance savings.
Where I operate from, has 2133 metres of runway, and at weights of 64tonnes and more, Vmu is often limiting.
In summary, if speeds are limited by Vmu, first try a lower flex(say 4degrees lower), if Vmu is still limiting, then go Toga!
Hope this helps, spasibo!
peacock1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.