Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ETOPS divert speed


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ETOPS divert speed

Old 29th January 2010 | 08:01
  #41 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Originally Posted by None
I am not able to provide engine anti-ice for the inop engine.
- why would you want to?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 04:35
  #42 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 7
From: N/A
If I'm 180-minute EDTO approved, and I have an engine failure right at the ETP, which is exactly 180 minutes from my selected alternates, am I actually required to fly the company’s OEI diversion speed (say .85/340) to remain within the approved 180-minute limit?

The reason I ask is that our operations manual specifically states that the OEI diversion speed is used both to define the area of operation (i.e. max diversion distance) and for “conducting the diversion following an engine failure.”



ElNull is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 08:19
  #43 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 581
Likes: 412
From: UK
It’s very rare for the ETP to be exactly 180mins from both airfields. Over the North Atlantic there’s always lots of overlap so you will always have extra fuel even at the ETP. Only the route to the Caribbean have I ever seen extra fuel loaded in order to meet ETOPS requirements. You also have 15mins holding on arrival at the diversion. So you won’t run out of fuel!
Propellerhead is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 09:24
  #44 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 26
Likes: 5
From: EU
Originally Posted by ElNull
If I'm 180-minute EDTO approved, and I have an engine failure right at the ETP, which is exactly 180 minutes from my selected alternates, am I actually required to fly the company’s OEI diversion speed (say .85/340) to remain within the approved 180-minute limit?
No, the ‘fixed speed’ is just used to define the area of ops and the fuel planning requirements. If things all go wrong in reality, then you can fly however you need to, according to the circumstances.

Rostermouse is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 14:38
  #45 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 7
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Rostermouse
No, the ‘fixed speed’ is just used to define the area of ops and the fuel planning requirements. If things all go wrong in reality, then you can fly however you need to, according to the circumstances.
ok, but based on the example I mentioned, wouldn't it make sense to use the approved OEI speed (which is also the same company speed shown in the FMC) to ensure I reach the alternate as quickly as possible, and try to remain within the 180-minute EDTO limit?

If I choose to fly at a slower speed, I might even risk exceeding the cargo fire suppression
ElNull is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 15:03
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas USA
Doubtful. Remember, the faster you go, the more drag, the greater the fuel burn. Likewise with lower altitudes. Different operators might use different speeds for the same type of aircraft. When computing ETPs, dispatch doesn’t have to include time and fuel for the turn or decent, nor APU operation. Use your FMC fuel calculations to the fullest extent. Sometimes dispatch planning can overlap “over water, extended overwater, flag and/or ETOPS” requirements, resulting in “re-releases.”

Fire suppression for every aircraft must be rated to exceed the Area of Operation, e.g. 195 minutes for 180 minute approval.

Some companies grant captains greater authority and latitude than others.
HalinTexas is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 21:16
  #47 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 7
From: N/A
Originally Posted by HalinTexas
Doubtful. Remember, the faster you go, the more drag, the greater the fuel burn. Likewise with lower altitudes. Different operators might use different speeds for the same type of aircraft. When computing ETPs, dispatch doesn’t have to include time and fuel for the turn or decent, nor APU operation. Use your FMC fuel calculations to the fullest extent. Sometimes dispatch planning can overlap “over water, extended overwater, flag and/or ETOPS” requirements, resulting in “re-releases.”

Fire suppression for every aircraft must be rated to exceed the Area of Operation, e.g. 195 minutes for 180 minute approval.

Some companies grant captains greater authority and latitude than others.
thanks for the response. Isn’t the EDTO fuel calculation at the ETP (CP) based on the OEI-approved diversion speed? (the same speed used to define the EDTO area of operation)

In our Ops Manual, this speed is referred to as the “Company Speed” or “OEI Approved Speed”, and we even see it on the FMC > VNAV E.OUT > COSPD prompt. That makes me think it’s more than just a planning tool.

My point is: I’m not totally convinced this speed is only for planning.

ElNull is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd June 2025 | 22:44
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by ElNull
thanks for the response. Isn’t the EDTO fuel calculation at the ETP (CP) based on the OEI-approved diversion speed? (the same speed used to define the EDTO area of operation)

In our Ops Manual, this speed is referred to as the “Company Speed” or “OEI Approved Speed”, and we even see it on the FMC > VNAV E.OUT > COSPD prompt. That makes me think it’s more than just a planning tool.

My point is: I’m not totally convinced this speed is only for planning.
My regulator very helpfully expanded on this. The bolding is my emphasis.

If minimum diversion time and getting the aeroplane on the ground as soon as possible are the most critical considerations, a high one-engine inoperative speed strategy may be selected, as permitted by the aeroplane’s fuel state, altitude capability and structural integrity. For two- engine aeroplanes, the time strategy is sometimes considered to be equivalent to the approved one engine inoperative speed, but a higher speed approaching VMO/MMO could be selected if conditions warrant. The flight crew is not bound by the speed assumptions used for EDTO flight preparation purposes.

Last edited by here_we_go_again; 24th June 2025 at 19:31.
here_we_go_again is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2025 | 20:25
  #49 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 7
From: N/A
Originally Posted by here_we_go_again
My regulator very helpfully expanded on this. The bolding is my emphasis.

If minimum diversion time and getting the aeroplane on the ground as soon as possible are the most critical considerations, a high one-engine inoperative speed strategy may be selected, as permitted by the aeroplane’s fuel state, altitude capability and structural integrity. For two- engine aeroplanes, the time strategy is sometimes considered to be equivalent to the approved one engine inoperative speed, but a higher speed approaching VMO/MMO could be selected if conditions warrant. The flight crew is not bound by the speed assumptions used for EDTO flight preparation purposes.
thanks, this is indeed helpful. Do you happen to have a reference or document where your regulator explained this? I’d be really interested to read more. You can share in a PM id you wish. Cheers!
ElNull is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.