Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 Fcom 1.22.30 P12 Speed/mach Switching

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 Fcom 1.22.30 P12 Speed/mach Switching

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 20:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 Fcom 1.22.30 P12 Speed/mach Switching

I confess I don't fully understand when and why the selected speed target switches to mach target (or the opposite in descent).

When speed is managed I understand that, as there is a known speed/mach schedule, the FMGC knows what the crossover altitude is, and changes over exactly at the crossover altitude. Am I correct?

In selected speed, however, the FMGC doesn't know what our plans are for the climb (or descent), so it switches to mach (or speed) at a FL according to the table in this paragraph. Am I correct? For a given climb IAS there is a given mach number and a crossover FL? And for a given descend mach number there is a given IAS and a given crossover FL? If so, I don't know very well how to read that table.

For instance, climbing at 300 kt, What will occur? switch to 0.76 at FL265 always?
And what about descending at 0.76? will the target switch to 280 kt at FL305always?
What about climb speeds lower than 280? Is it that at any speed lower than that the switching will occur always at FL305, whatever the actual mach number?
And what about descending mach numbers lower that 0.76? Is it that at any mach lower than that the switching will occur always at FL 305 no matter what the IAS?

thanks
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2009, 09:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, I've found a similar table and agree with your changeover assumptions. The table does not seem to be complete. I'm assuming the "Crossed Box" is missing at FL315 and above the 280 kts /.76 column.

I'll investigate your .75 descent changeover FL and your 270 kts climb next chance I get.

I find Airbus is poor at providing information for pilots, it's almost as if they attempted to design the pilot out of the flight deck.

Rgds rudderrudderrat
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2009, 18:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had you bothered to search you would have found this...

http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/37496...switching.html
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2009, 06:05
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you

However, they didn't come to a conclusion.

Still a "mistery"
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2009, 06:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rudderrudderrat

thank you

Let's see what empyrical research shows...

Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2009, 12:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M2002
I confess I don't fully understand when and why the selected speed target switches to mach target
Do you need to understand? Why not just fly the aeroplane? You have chosen to use SEL SPD for a reason - just monitor the a/c and if you don't like the IAS or M after changeover then adjust it!
What difference would it make if there was no table?
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2009, 17:02
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, of course.
Climb and cruise mach number is the same most of the times for a given company CI, so all we have to do is switch the reference to Mach number manually when this particular mach number is reached, or switch back to speed if the FMGC switches it on its own before reaching it.

It is only I would like to know exactly how the system works. I don't like seeing a table in the FCOM that I don't know how to interpret.
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 14:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Greece
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What difference would it make if there was no table?
Then why does Airbus bother presenting a table in the FCOM which makes no difference?
aristoclis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.