Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Rolls Royce Viper Engine

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Rolls Royce Viper Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2009 | 12:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 156
From: Here, there, and everywhere
Rolls Royce Viper Engine

Anybody flown an aircraft with them.

An article I read said that not all the bearings recovered oil and therefore oil had to be added on every turnaround.

Any other turbine engines like that?
punkalouver is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 12:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Partial loss systems were quite common on early jets. Don't remember if the spey was designed that way but in practice it worked that way.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 12:37
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: UK
I haven't had anything much to do with the Viper, but the Rolls Royce RB162 had a total loss oil system where all the oil was scavenged out to the exhaust.
The engine was the Boost Engine fitted to the Trident 3 and so wasn't in use all the time. I do remember checking the oil quantity on a gauge in the rear equipment bay and topping up from a remote re-oiling point close by.
Doctor Teeth is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 15:36
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 5
From: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
On the early HS125's with vipers used to have to get up on the pylon after each sector and add 1 litre per hour of flight from tins. Great fun in the snow!
Later viper ones had a remote replenishment system in the equipment bay, then they went to fans that don't use any oil to speak of.
BizJetJock is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 17:39
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
It went out of the centre main and rear turbine bearing seals - the hot bits. It had micro pumps to limit the loss. The Viper was a very early engine (1953)and they hadn't worked out how to seal them at that time. And with the Viper's fuel consumption, you were never going to run out of oil before you ran out of fuel!

Dan Winterland is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 18:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
The Pegasus has a partial total loss system and oil useage can be the limiting issue on very long mutiple AAR sorties unless precautions are takem. If you see a Harrier in the hover you can sometimes see smoke venting from near the front right hand cold nozzle.
Proof Reader is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 18:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: UK
Wasn't the Viper known as one of the most efficient means known to mankind of converting petrochemicals into noise and smoke? It certainly seemed to have bugger-all to do with thrust.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2009 | 20:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Pacific
I was told the Viper was originally built for the Jindivik unmanned target airplane and was only supposed to be run a few times before being blown up. Hence simple design.
boofhead is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2009 | 00:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Didn't all the MB326H Macchi trainer aircraft have them?

At least the ones that used to be in service as advanced trainers in the RAAF did!

And you're quite right, they were a 'bit' underpowered!

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Reply
Old 26th September 2009 | 07:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
A bit underpowered!!!

The "Fanta can's" were, a little unkindly, said to have "variable noise, constant thrust".
Old Fella is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2009 | 02:05
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Throttle setting was just like using a telegraph system to the engine room!

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2009 | 22:43
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, Alabama
Have a lot of Viper time in an HS125-600. Oiling the engines was done only when needed. Checking them was at every possible opportunity.

Rarely did those two numbers diverge.

A lot of Spey time in G1159's. If they weren't dirty on the bottom of the cowl, it was because you held 300 knots until final, or they were out of oil. Many a time in Newfoundland on a tech stop, it was 5 minutes to refill the sumps (2x2.5 minutes). Max human exposure time on a ladder in 40 knots at -30F was 20 seconds.

Tays..... Brand new airplane. New owner standing at cargo door waiting for a particular bag to emerge from hatch. Sees a drop of oil draining from cowling and asks why does a brand new plane leak oil?

Had to smile. That's not a leak, I said. That's a sign of progress.
singpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2009 | 08:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 1
From: Sunrise Senior Living
Jet Provost (3 and 4) trained in the 60s. The viper was very reliable - I don't remember any engine problems at my flying training school apart from icing - no de or anti-icing kit fitted. I seem to remember that the thrust was a ton plus 8 lbs ie 2248lbs. The mark 3 was undepowered but the Mark 4 went quite well and was therefore popular for aeros and the high level trips. No pressurization though - the 'bends' were common amongst the QFIs during the high level phase!

Boofhead is right - the Viper was designed for the Jindivic drone and was therefore simple.

Happy days!
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2009 | 06:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
Forerunner to Jindivik

The forerunner to the Viper powered Jindivik was the GAF Pika, a manned version of the Jindivik. Only two were built and one still survives in the RAAF Museum at Point Cook, Victoria, Australia. Google up GAF Pika for more info.
Old Fella is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2009 | 17:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: France
Rolls Royce Viper engines

I flew a lot of time in an HS 125 403B and it had these engines. The F/O's seemed to lose the toss, more than the Captain, so they ended up more on the pylons, checking the oil and topping it up if necessary.

The Viper at that time had the reputation of , if you could light it off it would then never let you down.

Tmb
Tmbstory is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2009 | 18:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 440
Likes: 2
From: Just over the road from Bicester airfield
Constant Loss systems

The Sapphire in Victor 1 & 1A was a constant loss engine from the turbine bearing scroll area, Paul H.
zetec2 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.