Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TCAS RA CLIMB on max a/c Celling

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TCAS RA CLIMB on max a/c Celling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Sep 2009, 21:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bonair
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCAS RA CLIMB on max a/c Celling

Hello mates.
On my latest check ride I was amazed with one issue.
We're flying an A320 with at FL390 (max). We get a TCAS climb. What do we do?
We climb and maintain the V/S on the green or.... The hell with it, do not risk a high alt and speed stall and hope the other traffic gets and complies with the TCAS descent???

Thanks guys.

Overheat
Overheat is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 21:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what did you do?
763 jock is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 21:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Coupla hundred feet aint gonna hurt much, surely?
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 21:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody who is willing to climb to FL390 to cruise, and then think following a TCAS RA "Climb" is a problem, surely has their priorities / risk management understanding somewhat adrift

After all, what is the buffet margin at Max Rec Cruise there for

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 21:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
To allow for increased load factor due to a turn at x.x G ?
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 22:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Follow the RA and miss the oncoming/climbing/descending hardware. Stall at FL410 if you have to, recover by 29000' and you'll still clear Everest.
763 jock is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 22:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Posts: 1,955
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"cover by 29000' and you'll still clear Everest."

Amen, brutha. (or sista)
GrandPrix is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 22:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe one of the boffins can clarify, but I think latest S/W has MAX ALT in your TCAS Loaded S/W.

Bummer if the other guy is also at MAX ALT. Maybe one gets the -2000 cue and the other gets the 0 cue.

Someone knows.

But as said, I'd certainly find a way to squeak out a few hun up if that's what the RA cue was.
singpilot is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 22:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Greece
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCAS RA orders must be followed even at max ceiling altitude with CLIMB orders.
Stall warning must be respected.

In alternate law it is not wise to be at FL390. In normal law stall warning does not apply. Alpha protection and Alpha floor do. Get the best your airplane can give you and pray...
aristoclis is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 22:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny, I wasn't thinking of a Bus.

I was thinking of say.... G4. Civilian Svc Ceiling is FL450. Military ceiling is FL510. Depending on the version, service ceilings can be quite different in 'normal' airplanes.

Yes, the Bus gives you a little more 'help' if you want to call it that with Alpha floor and Alpha Prot. But even that will bite if there is a pax onboard named Murphy.
singpilot is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 23:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: KDEN
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At light weights the Bus can provide your buffet margin well above FL390. The limitation stems from her (in)ability to get down. Even if you had hardly any margin, for whatever reason, pull till she shakes. As Nigel said, priorities.
Cardinal is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2009, 23:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, Cardinal for reminding me of that. Most service ceilings are derived from several performance factors. Newer planes almost always have a dive time problem cuz they are so clean (limiting the altitude that the dive starts at). Or the max number is where you cannot climb by more than some vertical rate.

In a Bus, yes, pull and let the computers do the work.
singpilot is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 00:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
NoD

My current plane has about 1.6G at FL450, so your point is? Probably something about larger planes.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 02:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the Max Ceiling is pin programmed on the TCAS Processor mounting tray at installation. You should not recieve a RA to climb above this programmed value.

Cheers, TP
Thai Pom is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 02:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks TP, I was pretty sure that was the case.
singpilot is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 05:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My current plane has about 1.6G at FL450, so your point is? Probably something about larger planes.
My point is that with 1.6g available, you have plenty of potential to follow the RA.

I might not have expressed it well? To clarify, my point is your priorities are somewhat adrift if you have climbed to a FL where your performance would be so limited that following an RA gives you any concern. You would surely also be considering turbulence, windshear (it terms of W/V altering quickly), engine failure etc. all of which require some tolerance to IAS/M altering somewhat.

And the absolute (rather than current) Max Ceiling will often have pressurisation / fatigue as a factor, which are not applicable here.

Summary: At FL390 in a 320 series Airbus, I am much happier explaining to my Flt Mgr why I went to FL395 following an RA, than ignoring the RA and all the consequences of that

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 06:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
Posts: 1,422
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Have a look here. Though they deal with B737, events 5 & 6 are of some relevance to thread.

FL390 is pressurization limit on 320family. If you exceed it, cabin alt will climb as the pressurization controller keeps max diff pressure but that's about it. If sector length wasn't a factor, I never had problems reaching it on 319 with CFM56-5B engines. 320s with -5A were somewhat different story, cruising at FL350 when heavy. Vls is about 1.28 Vs1g when clean, so bus doesn't stall immediately below Vls mark - its the black/red stripe on speed tape that shows your stall margin, not orange one.

I believe the Max Ceiling is pin programmed on the TCAS Processor mounting tray at installation.
Definitively dependent on aeroplane and TCAS computer model. See link above.

The limitation stems from her (in)ability to get down.
Hmmm... I really doubt it. There are no speed or alt limitations on use of speedbrakes and with boards out at Vmo, she dives almost like SB2C. There is a recommendation about not using speedbrakes above FL250 IIRC, for pax comfort though.

Last edited by Clandestino; 17th Sep 2009 at 07:31. Reason: Typo
Clandestino is online now  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 06:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the link. You are correct there are various ceiling altitude options that can be programmed dependant on Aircraft type.
Thai Pom is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 09:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This doesn't really take much thinking does it?

Follow RA, miss conflict, explain to fleet chief why you broke a limit.

Ignore RA, So does other guy, hit conflict, no need to explain anything.

If you are at 390 it's because you have the performance to be there.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2009, 09:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some FCOMs state that TA can be selected when performance limited to avoid performance limiting RAs.
captjns is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.