Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Yachty aerodynamics question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Yachty aerodynamics question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th June 2009 | 10:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: UK
Danger Yachty aerodynamics question

Here is a fun question for those interested in sailing and aerodynamics: does the size of an anemometer's cups affect the rotational speed? And does the radius of the arm supporting the cups affect speed likewise? All given same loading and wind speed.


A320 sailor
Pedro is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2009 | 10:57
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 37
From: Kelowna Wine Country
The size of the cups, if adequate, is not important. The advancing cup would also be bigger/smaller.

The radius would change the revolutions, obviously, but the instrument is geared to show wind speed for the built radius.
ChrisVJ is offline  
Reply
Old 26th June 2009 | 03:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: A place with no name
yeah what Chris said!

Here's another one....

Why do they have those insane bullbus weights at the bottom of the keel. Why not make it a moveable wing so as to generate more control?
SoundBarrier is offline  
Reply
Old 26th June 2009 | 04:54
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 434
Likes: 9
From: Darwin, Australia
SB,

They already do.

Most new maxis have the lead on a keel that can be swung side to side by hydraulics. However, racing rules require a certain amount of stability with the bulb hard over - otherwise an unintential gybe or round up could be nasty. The biggest problem with this system is building it strong but light enough - one failed spectacularly on the Sydney to Hobart a couple of years - actuating arms broke, keel swang violently from side to side until it departed the yacht.

Most yachts with this system do have a controlable foil close to the keel in addition to the rudder.

Like aircraft, weight is critical in racing yachts. A certain amount of ballast is always required in monohulls, and the longer the moment arm you can attach it to the more righting moment you achieve. More righting moment allows you to carry more sail area, and to point higher into the wind.
werbil is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2009 | 21:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, Alabama
My Hunter 433 had a winged keel (fixed) with a large 'bulb'. The difference in draft between the normal keel and the keel I had was just short of 2 feet. The boat was a 'Caribbean Spec' boat, so the shoaler draft was a plus.
singpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2009 | 05:16
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 6
From: Sydney
SB - mainly for stability, the 60' boat that I normally sail is certified to self-right from 168 deg of roll when carrying a full main and head sail...takes a lot of righting moment to drag that much sail through the water!

I'm not a fan of swinging keels, we use water ballast - we can add 8 ton of weight to the right bits of the boat when we need it, and get rid of it when we don't.
Miraz is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2009 | 15:06
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: Glorious West Sussex
ChrisVJ

Why not answer the question?
The advancing cup would also be bigger/smaller.
What???? Hilarious.
TyroPicard is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2009 | 09:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch
Back to the original question ...

looking at a spare parts catalogue for weather instruments
in the distance past, I recall seeing that they offered a rotor
with larger cups to boost low speed capability. This is obvious
when you think about it - bigger cup -> larger force -> more
torque -> better ability to overcome stiction.
If you move the cups closer to the axle, the faster the rotor
will rotate for a given wind speed. However, you then reduce the
torque. There would also be interference effects come into play, reducing
the performance.
Cup anemometers have problems in gusty weather where the rotor
inertia causes overspeed indications at times
LurkerBelow is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2009 | 10:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Thailand
Talking of cups, would similar, half-cup, protrusions on the walls of aircraft tyres not rotate them up to a few hundred rpm prior to touchdown, so reducing the shock loading and tread wear on touchdown? I guess the tyre manufacturers would complain at the reduced wear rate.
rubik101 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2009 | 14:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, Alabama
I believe there was a program back in the 60's that did exactly this, it did, in fact spin the tires up, but the wear patterns did not change/decrease enough to warrant the cost of the mod.

The touchdown spoolup wear is inconsequencial compared to braking wear and heavy taxi and turning wear.

Keeping your partners' feet off of the brakes at touchdown is a biggie too. You'd be surprised at how many pilots have no idea what they are doing at touchdown with their feet. Brake applied pressure on the EICAS would prove my theory about certain suspected offenders.
singpilot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.