Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737NG PFD Barometric Indications

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737NG PFD Barometric Indications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2009, 20:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737NG PFD Barometric Indications

As I understand QNH/STD selection via the EFIS box on the NG:

If you have STD selected and then 'twist' the QNH knob (or barometric selector) in either direction, the preselected QNH (the white numbers) always starts from 1013. Can anyone confirm this or did I dream it? The only reference I can find in the systems manual is pasted below:


1 Barometric Settings (green)
Indicates the barometric setting in either inches of mercury (IN) or hectopascals (HPA) as selected on the EFIS control panel.

Display is boxed amber if numeric is set and airplane is climbing above transition altitude, or if STD is set and descending below transition flight level.


2 Preselected Barometric Setting (white)
STD is displayed when the Barometric Standard (STD) switch is selected on the EFIS control panel.

When STD is displayed, a barometric setting can be preselected on the EFIS
control panel barometric selector and is displayed in small white characters below STD.
Sir Stanley Bigh is offline  
Old 12th May 2009, 22:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: here
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have STD selected and then 'twist' the QNH knob (or barometric selector) in either direction, the preselected QNH (the white numbers) always starts from 1013.
Yep, I've seen this too. Pre-selected QNH starts from 1013 when you twist the knob with STD selected. At first you'd think it started from the previously set QNH, but it probably makes more sense to start from standard...origin and dest can be huge distances apart :-)
Radar Love is offline  
Old 13th May 2009, 12:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer your question directly, Sir Stanley, yes, that is how is is designed. Presumably less chance of Mr Up-cock if the 'default' setting is the one you expect to be using (e 1013.2/29.92) when you are actually flying with that set. If a 'random' QNH setting (eg the last one used) was allowed, there is always the possibility it might not be noticed, whereas 1013 does tend to be 'noticed'. Additionally if an inadvertent selection of QNH is made above TL there will be no 'false' input to the autoflight system.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.