Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Best Regional Jet for short runways

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Best Regional Jet for short runways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th May 2009, 14:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best Regional Jet for short runways

Which Regional Jet -60 to 80 pax- has the best performance to operate from runways 4500/ 5000 feet and fly to a destination two hours away. It could also be an aircraft that is no longer in production.
MES Drvr is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 14:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Westward TV
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll start the ball rolling with a BAe 146. Should do the job.
GusHoneybun is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 14:35
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgot to add that it has to be a Twin Engine jet....Oops
MES Drvr is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 14:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hang on, let me check the FMS...
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does it have to be a Jet?

Otherwise a Dash 8 - Q400 does all the above
FlyingTinCans is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 16:37
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, it has to be a twin jet.
MES Drvr is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 16:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must be one of those Fockker thingamajigs say the 100?
dazdaz is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 17:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 35,000 feet
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best Regional Jet

How about the Embraer 145 as flown by bmi regional and Flybe. Regional have the best On Time Performance four years in a row, and I hear the Embraer 145 is quite economical, but only 50 seats.

If your question did not stipulate a jet, I would second the Q400 - not the nicest looking machine though!!
Mod Kit is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 18:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
EMB 145 can't take 60-80 pax.

You'd be looking at CRJs for that kind of pax load, but runway performance might be an issue.

Q400s or RJss are your next best options, if you are flexible enough to have a prop or 4 engines.

Otherwise you could be looking at stepping up to a Fokker F70/F100, larger Embraer 170/190 or an A318.. both of which have demonstrated good short field performance in LCY tests and have seats for 100+.
AircraftOperations is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 18:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Москва/Ташкент
Age: 54
Posts: 922
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
146 without a doubt. Great looking as well imho... its the first jet that must come to everyone's minds first!
flash8 is offline  
Old 8th May 2009, 22:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Embraer 170 would do it easily with enough fuel for 2 hours. (70-80 seats).

Even the slightly bigger Embraer 175 could do it (78-88 seats)
Take Off Field Length, ISA, SL, TOW for 500nm 4,137ft
Landing Field Length, SL, MLW 4,278ft

Cheaper to operate than the 146/Avro RJ (apart from initial purchase costs), 146's are 2 a penny now...

Good luck.
Piece of Cake is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.