Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Purpose of 727 rudder anti-balance tabs

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Purpose of 727 rudder anti-balance tabs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jul 2011, 11:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Old Fella,

My memory was failing when I posted on 17th. You are correct that the rudder boost was selected on most of the time, but Boeing published VMCA figures for Boost Off (about 60 kts faster). I found a copy here:
http://www.vpiaheritage.com/707limitations.pdf
on page 10.
I seem to remember we would turn the boost off in the cruise to dampen the yaw. Happy days!
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 12:09
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing found they weren't going to be able to put enough rudder on the airplane for it to be as controllable as they would like. Instead of redesigning the whole tail and increasing the size of the entire rudder them simply cut it in half (vertically) and added the tabs to increase effectiveness without increasing size.

727 Prototype Airplane Historical Photos and Data

You can scroll the the photos of the prototype here. You'll notice that on the first flight the tail and rudder all match in color, but there are photos interspersed of the aircraft at a later point with an all white rudder, which is the rudder used on the production aircraft.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 12:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@aviatorhi

Thx for the link

Brings back sweet memories...
hetfield is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 13:43
  #24 (permalink)  
"The INTRODUCER"
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And why was the 727 so safe?

Boeing stats. I've always been vaguely curious about that.
Algy is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 15:29
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like i said, he's got the pictures mixed up, that's a later test flight being labelled as the first, if you look at the rollout stills and the in flight photos from the (verified) first flight (and even video if you wanna look it up) you'll see the original (off-brown) rudder, later flights had the white rudder and modified system in response to the need for more yaw control/rudder authority.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 17:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation ''Dutch roll'' & B727, B727 ...

Dutch roll is a typical problem with Boeing.

Instead of rolling right and left and right and left , Airbus is worth : the tail fin gets broken by the typical strength of the roll.

But if the dutch roll begins, it is possible to stop this crazy dynamic, with a little mathematic. I did the demonstration five times in 1992.

At the end the ''dutch roll'' is cause of many incidents and accidents, false qualified.

When will pilots get a real formation to recognize a dutch roll, and come out of it ??

('roulishollandais' is the french expression for 'dutch roll')
roulishollandais is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 20:49
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,533
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
I am not sure whether the B707 ever did not have hydraulic boost to the rudder system or not.
According to 'Cats Eyes' Cunningham (I think) in his auto-biography, Boeing only fitted the rudder boost as a consequence of his insistance (to the UK CAA) that an average pilot would not-in certain conditions-be able to control the a/c. I think he meant after an engine failure at T/O, but as i don't have the book anymore I can't check. I'm sure someone will.
TURIN is online now  
Old 19th Jul 2011, 22:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roulishollandais
Instead of rolling right and left and right and left , Airbus is worth : the tail fin gets broken by the typical strength of the roll.
If that was supposed to be a joke, it's not very funny.
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 16:57
  #29 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The -100 aircraft we flew for training was "bent" from a prior mid-air
Are you sure that it had been damaged by a mid-air?

The reason I am asking is that I flew the old 'Hoot' Gibson -100 and it flew just like you related. It always seemed like it wanted to fly sideways and it was impossible to keep in trim.

Fortunately we only leased it for a short period, about a month.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 00:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,415
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
That's a new story about the old "Boeing". EAL had a -100 that flew pretty strangely, as an F/E, I'd watch the pilots putting in trim, then taking it out, then putting some more in. I'd nervously watch fuel balance, assuming I'd screwed it up. It had been in a snow bank at some time inits life and not under control.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 05:29
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Boeing has never installed a Yaw 'dampener' in any Aircraft.




It is called a Yaw Damper !
stilton is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 17:17
  #32 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aircraft I’m referring to is N27, which was in a mid-air SE of Kingfisher and was recovered safely with a complete hydraulic failure (A & B system) and part of the stab missing. (They were IFR assigned in VMC and hit by a VFR GA aircraft.)

N27 was definitely “bent”.

This airplane was transferred to the Marshal’s Service. It was eventually re-designated N530KF in honor of the wife of one of the USMS pilots. She sadly died as a result the Murrah bombing.

I eventually flew this aircraft again when I transferred over to the USMS (Con-Air, Air Slammer) to escape management madness on the west side of the airfield. At this time, USMS operated two 727-100’s & one 727-200 plus two Hawker 800’s.

I believe the projected cost of a number of required AD’s for the old gals resulted in their eventual demise, and eventually 727-200’s were leased from a couple of operators, prior to converting to 737-400’s. Now they operate Mad Dogs.

I eventually ended up back on the west side in R&D and finally retired. I always highly respected the USMS/JPATS pilots as a group
Yes, you are correct. I did fly that aircraft for ten years. You must have joined JPATS just after I left, we still had the Sabre 80s then. My favorite 72 was 113. I did get my type rating in the aircraft we are discussing, then it had the 'N' number of N2777. In fact there is an in-flight photo of N2777 with the original USMS paint scheme hanging in my bar.

As for the 'Hoot' Gibson 727, we leased it from some airline, that I cannot remember the name of now, which was based at DFW. Let me tell you, after flying that hunk of junk and then got back into 530KF, you thought you were flying a brand new 727. God that thing flew horribly.

In the ten years I was with the Marshal Service I flew over ten thousand hours, 7,000+ was in the 727s. I got to where I really loved the 727-100, my God, the things you could do with those aircraft. I never really understood just why they replaced the 72s, after all, they were bought and paid for and when I was there, in great shape. So why get rid of bought and paid for aircraft and replace them them with leased aircraft, that could not do the mission profile the 727 was capable of.... Well, it just never made sense to me. Of course I heard rumors, but rumors are rumors and I never assign much credit to them.

Anyway, I'm sure we flew with a lot of the same guys there, overall I enjoyed my years with the Marshal Service, but I never looked back after I left.

Oh, the lady killed in the OKC bombing was one of my best friends and she sang at our wedding when my wife and I were married.

And finally;

The aircraft I’m referring to is N27, which was in a mid-air SE of Kingfisher and was recovered safely with a complete hydraulic failure (A & B system) and part of the stab missing. (They were IFR assigned in VMC and hit by a VFR GA aircraft.)
Believe it or not, I was standing on the ramp of Catlin Aviation (an long gone FBO at Will Rogers) and saw N27 land after that mid-air. Never in my wildest imagination would I have believed that years later I would be flying that same aircraft.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 23:11
  #33 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One to change the bulb and four to talk about how great the old bulb was.
Yeppers, but it was a grand, great old bulb.

Did you ever have a chance to fly a -100 with MD-80 type engines?

I did once, and if you closed your eyes at the wrong moment, you'd out climb the wing in a heartbeat.

But progress is progress and life goes on, I miss flying the DC-3 as well.


Okay, not as much.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 04:24
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I remember Catlin Aviation from my check flying days !


The B727 was the First Jet I ever flew. It was a dream come true.



I think it was the best handling narrowbody made.




I was lucky.
stilton is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.