Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Level off Rate of Climb/ Descent

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Level off Rate of Climb/ Descent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 14:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Level off Rate of Climb/ Descent

Hi,

Looking for the law (FAA, ICAO) or recommendation reference for reducing the ROD/ ROC to 1500fpm max in the last one thousand feet to assigned altitude.Is this a mandatory or reccomended procedure?

Thanks!!
ranklein is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are no FARs under Part 91 that limits rates of climb or descent other than what may be imposed as an ATC clearance.

Procedural to avoid TA/RAs do to rapid encroachment into your aircraft’s threat protection zone.

Last edited by captjns; 22nd Feb 2009 at 15:57.
captjns is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:07
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, understand the meaning behind it.However, it seems it's a recommendation.I don't recall FMC/S computers calculating this (VNAV) for the last 1000 feet, when you use them.It's more when there's not a limitation that you need to reach a certain altitude at a certain point and cannot reduce the rate otherwise you won't make it.

Also looking where it's written.
Thanks.
ranklein is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somewhat hard to find in operators' documents, but a search of the FAA site yields:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...s/chng7mod.doc

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...nts/tcas_6.doc
Intruder is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 17:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,797
Received 119 Likes on 58 Posts
It's written into the Australian AIP, and as such, is a requirement in Australia.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 20:24
  #6 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's generally know as 'airmanship', especially in busy airspace.
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 20:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
Hi Checkboard,

Would you have a reference for the Aus AIP? All I can find is if ATC give you "standard rate" then it's 500fpm minimum and at 500fpm for last 1000'.
The The is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2009, 07:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ranklein, I am sure you will find the answer in the appropriate AIP.

This is what the UK AIP says at ENR 1.1.3 GENERAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES

2 Climb and Descent

2.2 Maximum Rates of Climb and Descent
2.2.1 In order to ensure the credible interaction of Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems and ground based safety nets, other than aircraft in emergency and certain specific conditions for military aircraft (as detailed in Military AIP and JSP552), all aircraft when Operating under normal circumstances, when inside Controlled Airspace within the London and Scottish FIRs/UIRs should not operate with a climb or descent rate exceeding 8000 ft per minute. Aircraft when first approaching a cleared flight level and/or when changing flight level in Controlled Airspace should ensure that the vertical closure speed is not excessive. It is considered that, with about 1500 ft to go to a cleared level, vertical speed should be reduced to a maximum of 1500 ft per minute and ideally to between 1000 ft per minute and 500 ft per minute. Pilots should ensure that the aeroplane neither undershoots nor overshoots the cleared level by more than 150 ft, manually overriding if necessary.
2.3 Minimum Rates of Climb and Descent
2.3.1 In order to ensure that controllers can accurately predict flight profiles to maintain standard vertical separation between aircraft, pilots of aircraft commencing a climb or descent in accordance with an ATC Clearance should inform the controller if they anticipate that their rate of climb or descent during the level change will be less than 500 ft per minute, or if at any time during such a climb or descent their vertical speed is, in fact, less than 500 ft per minute.

2.3.2 This requirement applies to both the en-route phase of flight and to terminal holding above Transition Altitude.
Note: This is not a prohibition on the use of rates of climb or descent of less than 500 ft per minute where necessary to comply with other operating requirements.

Hope this helps ...

Incidentally, in the above, I would interpret "should" as "strongly recommended" (i.e. good airmanship) rather than mandatory, which would be written as "must".

JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 00:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FAA AIM 4-4-10:

d. When ATC has not used the term "AT PILOT'S DISCRETION" nor imposed any climb or descent restrictions, pilots should initiate climb or descent promptly on acknowledgement of the clearance. Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft to 1,000 feet above or below the assigned altitude, and then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between 500 and 1,500 fpm until the assigned altitude is reached. If at anytime the pilot is unable to climb or descend at a rate of at least 500 feet a minute, advise ATC. If it is necessary to level off at an intermediate altitude during climb or descent, advise ATC, except when leveling off at 10,000 feet MSL on descent, or 2,500 feet above airport elevation (prior to entering a Class C or Class D surface area), when required for speed reduction.
Zeffy is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2009, 07:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FWIW, the AIM is not regulatory, though it is often treated as such...
Intruder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.