Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

747-8 Family Details (From 747 Chief Engineer)

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

747-8 Family Details (From 747 Chief Engineer)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2009, 22:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Oh C'mon Mr. Boeing have a Heart - will Ya! Let's JUST Have One More


Please

PA
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 00:19
  #22 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cr2, as I recall, the 747 had no interest for USAF. Except for tankers, all must be high wing.
 
Old 5th Mar 2009, 00:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,415
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
AF

Too true, the Stewart ANG was all set to fly them, Scoop Jackson (D-Boeing) died and the AF purchase died with him.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 00:45
  #24 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,194
Received 106 Likes on 69 Posts
Are you at the show next week ?
john_tullamarine is online now  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 08:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CR2 - As in Joe Sutter's book "747" the design for the 747 was not the same as the entrant for the military contract, but was a new design using technology from the military concept. In fact it resembled an aircraft that the Russians have built, the An 124 - it had an anhedral wing with underslung engines and a conventional tail-plane (not a T-tail). The new design for the 747 satisfied Juan Trippe's request for a large passenger jet to carry 350 pax.
point8six is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 09:09
  #26 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Close to FACT
Age: 55
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the clarification folks.
CR2 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2009, 22:02
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Otherwise we'd be seeing or would have seen a slew of 747-400 conversions which have had flat interest in the last 5 or more years, despite the 747-8F being available too - and instead, orders for the latter remain firmly intact.
The last 5 years we where in an economic boom. On top of that many A380 were delayed, forcing airlines to keep 747-400 longer in service then they planned to. Thats why we saw 747-400 conversions being postphoned.
keesje is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2009, 05:42
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

Considering most 747-400 operators are also 777-300ER operators, that is a moot point.

Part of the reason why the 747-8I and A380 have sold so poorly is the shift to more longer range twins (777, 787, A350XWB).

Even prior to the A380, with 77W deliveries, there wer ebarely double-digit orders for 747-400 conversions anyway - considering the 777F has far better economics than a converted 747-400, its a no brainer in todays world.
BOEING777X is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2009, 22:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even prior to the A380, with 77W deliveries, there wer ebarely double-digit orders for 747-400 conversions anyway - considering the 777F has far better economics than a converted 747-400, its a no brainer in todays world.
A new 747 / 777 is three times as expensive. Fuel prices are low. There is overcapasity among the 747 overhaul providers. The Asian take over. They do most Cargo conversion too. (TAECO)

As long as credit is no restriction for a cargo mover, the addition $150.000.000 for a brand new machine should be no problem..
keesje is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 16:04
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing: 747-8 Intercontinental Passes 25 Percent Design Milestone

EVERETT, Wash., April 27, 2009 -- The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] has passed a major milestone in the design of the 747-8 Intercontinental, completing 25 percent of the design releases for the new passenger airplane. This means a quarter of the information needed to build parts and tools for assembly has been completed and released for fabrication or procurement.

"We have made tremendous progress on the design engineering," said Mo Yahyavi, vice president and general manager for the 747 Program. "The engineering is proceeding as planned and we are a step closer to bringing the 747-8 Intercontinental to market."

Since much of the design is the same as the 747-8 Freighter, which Boeing is building first, the engineering focus is on work that is unique to the 747-8 Intercontinental, comprising mostly fuselage and interior design. The most obvious difference is that the 747-8 Intercontinental fuselage will boast an extended upper deck.
On the interior, the airplane will incorporate features from the 787 Dreamliner, including a new curved, upswept architecture that will give passengers a greater sense of space and comfort, while adding more room for personal belongings. The architecture will be accentuated by lighting technology that provides smooth transitions for a more restful flight.

"The 747 family has been a favorite among passengers," said Michael Teal, 747-8 chief project engineer. "The 747-8 Intercontinental will build on the memorable experiences they've had on a 747. The moment passengers step aboard a 747-8 Intercontinental, they will know it's a brand new airplane and enjoy a more relaxing flying experience."

As for the airplane's performance, the 747-8 will be stretched 18.3 feet (5.6 meters) from the 747-400 to provide 467 seats in a three-class configuration and a range of approximately 8,000 nautical miles (14,815 kilometers). It will deliver nearly equivalent trip costs to those of the 747-400 and 13 percent lower seat-mile costs, plus 26 percent greater cargo volume. The 747-8 Intercontinental also will be 16 percent more fuel efficient and create a 30 percent smaller noise footprint than its predecessor.

"The 747-8 Intercontinental will be a great airplane for our customers," said Yahyavi. "Our team is focused on completing the remaining detailed design needed to deliver the airplane in late 2011."

The 747-8, which includes the 747-8 Intercontinental and the 747-8 Freighter, was launched in November 2005 by Cargolux Airlines and Nippon Cargo Airlines. Lufthansa was the first airline to order the 747-8 Intercontinental in December 2006.
BOEING777X is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 16:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For reasons that utterly elude me, Airbus put the flight deck on the centre deck, rendering it cost prohibitive to ever make a nose loader out of it.
$$$ apart, tell me why it can't be done.
forget is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 19:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$$$ apart, tell me why it can't be done.
I'm not an engineer, but I would say the E/E bay is in the way.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2009, 04:08
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: On the Rise to Conquer!
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder why instead of stretching the 747-400 a further few metres, that Boeing itself just extends the top bit of the 2nd deck all the way till the end?
capt_akun is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2009, 04:43
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Two good reasons, first of all you do not gain any more cargo capacity, secondly,
those additional passengers on the top deck have to put their checked baggage into that same cargo area and you lose even more cargo space.

This, of course is one of the problems with the A380 whose cargo capacity is not that impressive for it's size.
stilton is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2009, 23:52
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: On the Rise to Conquer!
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stilton,

Gotcha. Thanks!
capt_akun is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.