Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus : Extensive Testing A30X Configurations

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus : Extensive Testing A30X Configurations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2009, 21:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus : Extensive Testing A30X Configurations

A nice summary on aviationweek.com on the ongoing studies for A320/737 successors.

Airbus Refines A30X Design | AVIATION WEEK

Engine choices and related aircraft configuration / EIS timelines seems still to be the open questions. Or EIS as driver for possible engine technology. A chicken or egg debate.

I think the airframers won't let even an economic downturn distract them from getting a good starting position in this x000 aircraft replacement segment.

To be or not to be committing to an open rotor engine seems to be the question.




To be or not to be, that is the question;
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles

Source: William Shakespeare's Hamlet
keesje is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2009, 22:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Galway, Ireland
Age: 32
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aviation enthusiast side of me REALLY likes those LeapX open-rotors, as does the nerdy side!
TheCosmicFrog is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2009, 08:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TheCosmicFrog The aviation enthusiast side of me REALLY likes those LeapX open-rotors, as does the nerdy side!
Yes its . It think LeapX is something CFM is working on, a bit more conventional. However Safran, GE as well as RR are looking at open rotors. RR more on puller like open rotors.

For othet techies / nerds: you can recognize an old / fake open rotor picture by counting the blades. Not having the front and aft rotors have the same number was a lesson learned in the late eighties; resonance & a lot of irritating noise.

On the newest open rotor studies I've seen the front and aft rotor blades even do not have the same lenght / shapes..


Last edited by keesje; 10th Feb 2009 at 09:50. Reason: add pic
keesje is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.